News:


  • July 02, 2025, 08:50:47 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
Open Forum / Re: PA65 NEW AAC piston/liner/rod/pin sets.
« Last post by Doug Moon on Yesterday at 06:14:58 PM »
   

   I think you more-or-less got it above. One other thing you might not fully appreciate is that, at least around here, more people ran the 61 rather than the 65. This was due to the former FAI 10CC rule. As soon as that got changed, Randy/Henry went to the 65, but not too long later, there was a 75. Most people still running IC are running the 75, for good reasons. I am probably the last person running a 61, it's a RO-Jett and it also doesn't wear out or need replacement parts.

     Some of the others are popular due to identified serious flaws (like the ST46) and for whatever reason, people are still trying to run some of these older engines. PA/RO-Jett, 40/46VF (for which there is already an AAC piston/liner, and the originals are nearly bulletproof), those are mostly specialist engines that only the few remaining top contenders still on IC would be interested in, and that is a very narrow market.

   As you note, the originals don't wear out under normal use, so any interest would be if it ran differently somehow, and most people will probably figure it runs well enough now. Any alterations I or someone else might suggest are, as far as I can tell, much different from what you would want to do otherwise, and would be highly speculative, and say, Todd might want one thing, Derek another, Brett another, all conflicting with each other.

     I think everyone appreciates and admires your efforts and the products seem to be of extraordinary quality. But as viable business suppling such a niche and contentious group, I don't see it and I am not too surprised that only a few signed up for it.

     Brett
   

Hello

I would say the number of people who stayed on the 61 vs the 65 is pretty small. Not very many people competed at the TT, 20 maybe and not all of them ran PA. When the 65 was in full swing it was all over the place at the nats. In our area it was king for many years. Mostly people went to the 75 because it became the only game in town.

Up until last year I was running the PA75 exclusively for 5 straight years. Lots of work to get that thing right. Then I got a message from someone that one of our stunt brethren was going into assisted living as was I interested in his NIB PA65. I couldn't answer YES fast enough.

Out goes the 75 and in with the 65 and BOOM all is right with world again. The envelope on this motor is huge. You can run it 9000 with loads of pitch or you can run 10700 with almost no pitch and everything in between. It cycles on and off like a breath of fresh air. The 61 can do this as well but it doesn't have that extra room like the 65. I ran 61 for a long time and it was excellent. I was talked to getting the 65 and the 61 has never seen the light of day again. It was a wedding present so it sits on a shelf now.  :)

I was able to do a direct comparison between the 65/75 on the same day in the same plane and 65 is just the right size. The props are a little smaller and that goes along way in many areas especially trim. The 75 requires a little more work to trap it into a range otherwise it can be a handful. Don't get me wrong I had it working well but it's not how I really prefer. The 65 in my opinion is the best IC hands down. It's just the right size for the models we fly.

I hope there is enough interest to make a run. But I fear with the electric on the scene that may not be the case as that is a very viable option these days and the 75 is still all over the place. I have 3 right now.
52
Open Forum / Re: Portable take-off strip??
« Last post by Crist Rigotti on Yesterday at 04:55:24 PM »
I used 10mm Coroplast.  I bought a 4 x 8 sheet and cut into 4 2 x 4 and used long nails in each corner.  Laid end to end with a slight overlap.  Used it for years.
53
Dave,
OK moved the spool up to 15 and set the ESC current cutoff to sensitive (was at normal). Did a quick test run up and all was good. For the soft start is there another setting that I should adjust to get up to full power sooner?

Best,   DennisT
54
ESC Settings / Setting for nose over
« Last post by Dennis Toth on Yesterday at 04:45:51 PM »
Guys,
Had an incident the other day where on take-off the ship hit some deep grass and flopped over, I expected the ESC to cut off on high amps but it kept flopping around trying to spin the prop. It was not at full RPM and did cut but I did see some wisp of white smoke from the motor area just before it shut down. I had this happen on another ship a few years back and it did toast the motor. This motor is a BAD ASS 2320/820k on 4S pack. Since there was nothing hot I decided to do a 10 sec test run just for the hell of it. ESC beeped normal and motor spun up as normal. I then did a quick test flight (gave myself more runway to get the ship off before the grass) and all was well. So, question since all seems well could the motor be OK or is it just going to suddenly fail in flight?

Also, in order to get the shutdown to occur faster I have moved the current cutoff from normal to sensitive, did a test run and it spooled up normal can I go to very sensitive, or would that cause a cut with just a minor clip of grass or the ground?

Best,    DennisT
55
Open Forum / Re: Portable take-off strip??
« Last post by Dennis Toth on Yesterday at 04:31:03 PM »
John,
Do you whole the ship in the stooge until you hit full power? How long and wide is your strip?

Best,   DennisT
56
Open Forum / Re: Li-on vs Li-po?
« Last post by bill bischoff on Yesterday at 03:10:59 PM »
Howard, which costs more if you leave it at the field?  VD~
57
Classifieds / Re: Kits For Sale
« Last post by Bob Rogers on Yesterday at 02:44:58 PM »
PRICE DROP! 
All  prices still include shipping to lower 48. 
If you want to pick them up, I'm 30 miles east of St. Louis and will drop another $25 off the price.
All are in factory cellophane except 1 of the Super Chipmunks but, it is factory complete.

Sig Akromaster $125
Brodak F7F Tigercat $150
Sig Mustang Stunter $180
Sig Skyray 35 $80
Sig Super Chipmunk (Qty=2) $160/ea
Sig Twister (Qty=2) $150/ea
58
Open Forum / Re: Weather
« Last post by john e. holliday on Yesterday at 02:19:46 PM »
just remembered Dad always said learn to live with it.   People complain when there is too much rain an then complain when it does dry up for a few weeks.   Some times I wish the NATS were back on the schedule when the NAVY sponsored it. S?P
59
Open Forum / Re: Portable take-off strip??
« Last post by john e. holliday on Yesterday at 02:15:35 PM »

i use a strip of carpet wit a nail/spike in the corners to keep it flat.  it only takes a few feet to get airb9rne.   My stooge helps hold the end down. D>K
60
Building techniques / Re: Control throw measurement.
« Last post by Ken Culbertson on Yesterday at 02:06:50 PM »
...you would adjust the bellcrank-flap pushrod length to get a straight-line relationship between leadout movement and control deflection.
Not quite although we may be saying the same thing differently.  I am not interested in the amount of control deflection only in the rate of turn and the presentation of the turn.  My goal is to get it to turn the same amount and same way both directions for a given input.  Adjusting the elevator changes the flap/elevator relationship and can cause the plane's AOA to differ between upright and inverted.  I am probably in the minority, but it bothers me to have a plane flying noticeably tail low in level flight either direction.  It is not a deduction and probably doesn't matter much.  Most of this, and the final tweaks, can be accomplished at the handle level but that is the last place I want to make changes other than the spacing to even things out between planes.   Addition of the canard on my Endgame design has heightened my awareness of differential movement.  It is very effective in guiding the nose throughout the flight (like a horozontal nose rudder).  If it is not absolutely aligned with the wing it creates a strong difference in how it turns.  Aligned properly, it's rate of turn relative to the flaps rate adds a very simple tool in leveling the plane.   Having said all of that, we are still back to the fact that it really doesn't matter much how we get there, only that we do.

Ken
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10