News:


  • June 07, 2024, 04:58:30 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Modelers vs pilots  (Read 8519 times)

Offline Tom McClain

  • Charter Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *****
  • Posts: 347
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #50 on: August 26, 2021, 10:38:21 AM »
Ohh Im sure it was "in accordance with the rules"

Unless you know absolutely for sure that our National Champion did not build his airplane, you are absolutely wrong.

By MY DEFINITION,  there have been countless Nats winners who have uses wings built by someone else.

Sure thats allowed, and its not even frowned upon, I get it.

I source my balsa and foam, built my own cutter, I cut my own core, physically cut my own ribs, lay them in the cradle I cut, glue them all together.

Im not dismissing guys who cant build a straight, light competitive wing..but dont sit there and tell me that building hasnt been compromised even " in accordance with the rules" by allowing ANY prefab parts.

Its pretty simple for me.

Did YOU BUILD the WHOLE plane ?

Its integrity at the end of the day, I wouldn't ever ask or expect the rules to change to allow someone else to FLY it for me, or even let me FLY 1 part of it.. why is this argument any different.

Your entirely open to your opinions.. and i will admit that plenty have won the Nats " in accordance with the rules"

But was it " in the spirit? "

unless it started as a pile of balsa and ended up :
as a completed plane
 100% built by the pilot
Then 100% painted by the pilot
And 100 % trimmed by the pilot
And 100% flown by the pilot

I dont think deviation of this is open to interpretation.

National champion used to mean ( to me ) the pinnacle of skill in every area.

Not "we have changed the rules to soften this"

Ok lets forget USA for a moment, the FAI and the pinnacle of this Worlds have been reduced to a flying event.

Its accurate to say there have been "world champions who have built their own planes and others who didnt build their own planes"

Its not a big deal.... Im probably just bitter and resentful I haven't won anything, so dont take what I have to say with any authority..

PJ, I was editor of Stunt News in 2006, 2007, and 2008 and remember the tempest in a teapot that Rich Peabody and others tried to create out of whole cloth about Orestes Hernandez and his Shark.  I interviewed Warren Tiahrt and Orestes Hernandez about the Shark and wrote about the false controversy and smear that had no basis in fact in the Nov/Dec 2007 issue of Stunt News on pages 4 and 5.  Bottom line is you don't know what you are talking about and are stirring up a false narrative that is beneath you.

Here is the truth as I discovered it:  Orestes Hernandez…In His Own Words
(Orestes Hernandez is the 2007 US Control Line Precision Aerobatics Champion. He is also a member of the 2008 United States World Championship Team.)
I’m originally from a small town named Florencia, in north central Cuba. When I was a young man, about 14, a guy came to my town with a model. I remember it well. It was a Nobler. My friend, Jorge Perez, and I started that day to build and fly models with small engines. (Before that we used a PVC plastic tube with batteries inside and one small toy car engine and a little prop. It was my first “model airplane”. It only ran…it never flew because there was no wing in it.) We flew combat for two years. I was the pilot and Jorge was the mechanic, but I always wanted to do one model for stunt.  It took a long time to get my first model, a Nobler, constructed. It was almost ready and stored under my bed when I came home one day to see the model broken in pieces in the wastebasket. My parents said they destroyed it because I never paid attention in school and the only thing I thought about was model airplanes. I cried when I saw it and was sad for a long time. Maybe nobody here feels something like that. Things change, though, and my parents are now very proud of me because they know I really love airplanes and am a good flyer.  After that I finished high school and entered the military university to be an engineer in motors and fuselages, MIG 21s to 29s and new models to come. In my third year there, for I do not know what reason, they changed me to another profession—electronic high and super high frequency radar. I did not like that and I quit the course. I finished my education in the civil university as a Civil Engineer (structure specialist) but I never got aviation out of my mind. I built a hang glider but never flew it. People thought I was crazy  I came to the United States in January of 1998 from Cuba. In August of 2001 I got to hold a handle for the first time after almost 20 years. I remember I flew a Nobler, and in my first flight I made some loops and inverted flight. That flight had been in my mind for the last 20 years, the years without ever holding one handle in my hand. The next week I started flying a Caudron and with that model I flew the complete pattern, even before I finished my first gallon of fuel.  After I arrived in the USA I met Orestes Perdomo. With his help I started flying stunt in August of 2001 at Tamiami Park in Miami with my friend Josias Delgado. Enrique Diez, another aeromodeler from Cuba, flew with us then also. Orestes Perdomo told me that there are stores called hobby shops where I could buy kits to build models. From that moment things were fine. I remember Orange Blossom Hobby Shop in Miami where I bought my first Legacy kits. At the time, I was living in upstate New York, in Watertown, and Orestes Perdomo gave me instructions over the phone for building my first model for the 2002 NATs.
January 2002 was my first contest--the King Orange International. I flew one model of Orestes Perdomo’s and without appearance points I got sixth place in Advanced. It was my first experience in my life in stunt competition. In 2002, in my first NATs, I flew a Legacy. I remember buying the Legacy kit in the Orange Blossom Hobby shop. As I remember, I was in the Top Twenty, eleventh place in Advanced I think, but I’m not sure exactly. In the 2003 NATs I was in second place. That was the year of the strongest wind. I remember Kent Tysor was first in Advanced. In 2004 I got to first place (Advanced National Champion) with a Legacy. (At this moment I have two Legacys in my house ready to fly.) That year, 2004, was when I meet Yuriy Yatsenko and I started at that time to work with the Shark Project. 2005 was my first year in Open. I finished in sixth place, so close to the top 5. I flew a warm-up flight for the judges that year in the finals. Fourth place in 2006 was better than the year before but in 2007 I was out of practice all year after the 2006 NATs. I knew I had to get to work. From June 7 to July 1 I made 125 flights, as I remember now. My goal was to keep the fourth place, like the year before. For me it was impressive when I got the first place. I know I worked hard for that. Nobody can do it without much practice, I think.  After the 2007 NATs and before the teams trials I spent four gallon plus of fuel--150 flights plus practice in Muncie. This year I think I was the first to arrive in Muncie. After my second practice flight at this year’s Team Trials I met Paul Walker. He was the first person on the field after me. We went to dinner that first night, too, and I want to say that I learned very much watching Paul’s flights and David Fitzgerald’s too.
I have been asked about the Yatsenko Shark I fly. I picked the Shark because the first time I saw the model its fuselage form impressed me.  I always try to do something impressive. I had started to build a Caudron but when I discovered the Shark I never finished the Caudron. I will do that soon. Maybe the Caudron will be as lucky as the Shark.  At the World Championships in 2004 Yuriy said that they would make kits for me when I insisted that I would need a kit airplane for the US NATs. I was friendly with the Yuriy’s people in Muncie and they seemed to feel good about my experiment with the Shark. Now I think Yuriy is working on a project to make kits available for everyone. I’m not sure when he will finish that project. At this time I have three Sharks done…one per year.
I don’t remember exactly how many hours it took to build the last one but I’m sure I had more than three hundred hours in the first one. The wing is made like a sandwich—two pieces of fiberglas over foam molding. The fuselage and stabilizer are balsa wood with fiberglas molding.  The sections were aligned in a jig. The jig is easy to make. You just need a table and some little pieces of wood to align things. I used the Yatsenko controls supplied with the airplane. The paint scheme is my own and uses urethane car paint.  My engine is a Discovery Retro. There’s nothing special about it. I use Randy Smith’s PA needle valve and glow plug and Omega FAI fuel. For me, the best prop is the Andreiy wide-tip prop.  People ask me how it felt to win the Open competition at the NATs, the Walker Cup, and a place on the World Team. It felt especially good to win the NATs because the members of the 2006 US World Team were there and they are very good flyers. I have a good feeling for a lot of people who congratulated me when I got first place, some of them many times. I will never forget that day nor the day I made the US Team and I thank all the people who helped me in the last six years. I wish the best for everybody.
- Orestes Hernandez
« Last Edit: August 26, 2021, 02:32:26 PM by Tom McClain »
Tom McClain

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6190
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #51 on: August 26, 2021, 11:01:00 AM »
Ken,
You just explained an approach for a rules change that is absolutely not needed.
Keith
I agree 100% that a rule change is not needed because most of our contests are run using PAMPA format with local rules except for the NATS.  I have changed my view on this 180 degrees in the last couple of years.   I was not paying attention when the 40 point rule was thrown out.  Had I been I would have opposed the change and if you look at the lineup at most contests today you can see why - no originality and not even many cockpits that weren't carved.  I am more concerned with the continuation of the sport/hobby than I am maintaining traditions that I feel will not survive once we are gone.  We also have the issue of where do all of those beautiful planes go when their owners are no longer around.  I would have gladly bought a couple from known sources when I lost my fleet but instead I had to sit it out because I could not build.  I tried one contest using a borrowed ARF.  Not pretty.

I recently had the opportunity to fly one of the Russian ARF's.  Real eye opener. 

Having said all of that,  in the words of Dennis Miller, "this is just my opinion and I could be wrong!"

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13773
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #52 on: August 26, 2021, 12:08:26 PM »
PJ, I was editor of Stunt News in 2006, 2007, and 2008 and remember the tempest in a teapot that Rich Peabody and others tried to create out of whole cloth about Oriestes Hernandez and his Shark.
...

   Just a small glimpse of the enormous iceberg that PAMPA has had to deal with for what is approaching *40 years* now and has on several occasions nearly destroyed the entire event - not to mention distract some of the principles from the far more important goal of *learning to trim, set up engines, and fly* competitively, greatly to their own detriment.

     Some of the major players made *exactly the mistake I warn people about all the time* - that is, to win at stunt you need to assume that the results are entirely under the  your control and that if you aren't winning, the reason is that you did not fly well enough, regardless of what anyone else is doing. I know from direct questioning that some of the people who did this to themselves *still don't get it* even when I explained exactly what their problem was and how it came to be - it was still mysterious forces operating against them.

    Even after Baron won the '96 NATS on pure merit, they completely misinterpreted that as "we are finally getting somewhere" and they *redoubled their efforts*. Thus *guaranteeing* that they would continue wasting their time trying to manipulate people off-the-field, instead of putting their effort to something useful.  No one had to conspire against them, they were conspiring against themselves very effectively.

     I have a reasonably complete explanation and history of the "stunt wars", but the details are largely moot at this point. A few people (like Peabody) aren't ever going to give it up, because they are so invested in the fighting that they either don't know or don't care that the war is long since over.

     Brett

   


Offline PJ Rowland

  • AUS - 29541 AMA - 809970
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2058
  • Melbourne - AUSTRALIA
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #53 on: August 26, 2021, 06:31:05 PM »
Im not here to argue. I didnt start the original thread. Im not  trying to diminish Orestes or his achievements. Im not naive, the guy is a champion.

Im passionate about stunt and I would prefer to see everyone developing. My ultimate fear is : We will collectively loose something if people arent developing and building their own stuff.

Im going to conceed ive had to sit and have a long think about what exactly my problem was.

Stunt is a multidisciplinary sport. You need to be proficient in many areas just to be able to be competitive.

Im entitled to compete and build and enjoy the hobby as much as anyone, and Ive never said my opinion is ever gospel. Im happy to be wrong, Im not TRYING to be controversial.

Is it wrong that I enjoy seeing OTHER peoples new planes?
Is it wrong that I get inspiration from people like Al Rabe ?
Is it wrong that I get motivation from seeing NEW ideas?
Is it wrong I want to dream oneday ill have that "perfect" setup?

I feel that the shark is a 20 year old design and there are hundreds of them, Im just trying to maintain one of the original elements of our beloved stunt hobby - uniqueness.



If you always put limit on everything you do, physical or anything else. It will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them.” - Bruce Lee.

...
 I Yearn for a world where chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned.

Offline Trostle

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3344
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #54 on: August 26, 2021, 07:49:21 PM »
Im not here to argue. I didnt start the original thread. Im not  trying to diminish Orestes or his achievements. Im not naive, the guy is a champion.

(Clip)


OK, so you are not here to argue.  However, you took the opportunity to belittle Orestes Hernandez and his achievements in winning the United States National Stunt Championship.  You had no knowledge of how Orestes built his airplane which was in accordance with our AMA rules.  At least you politely removed your erroneous statement from this thread.  Thank you for that.

Keith

Offline PJ Rowland

  • AUS - 29541 AMA - 809970
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2058
  • Melbourne - AUSTRALIA
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #55 on: August 26, 2021, 09:37:28 PM »
Actually everything in that article I had read before.

I knew that information, I was AT the competition in 2004 flying in expert when Orestes flew the Legacy in advanced. I also flew against Yuri and his Shark in 2004.

Please dont proclaim to know what I do and dont comprehend.

You have every right to be proud of Orestes and his World championship status. Once again I was physically THERE watching that competition and he was clearly the best pilot and flew the best corners and bottoms and deserved to be considered "World Champion"

I didnt "belittle" anyone, if that was your interpretation of my comments, then your entitled to form them, but Im telling you that was far from my point.

Its not about who flies what.. this thread was about modellers vs Pilots. I agree it was probably a baited thread that I fell for.. ( well played )



What do you want me to say ?

Im happy about giving up any advantages I thought I had gained over 30 years of personal development to people who can buy a competitive alternative  and be in the air alot faster amd bypass the learning curve?

Its more about :where is the future if innovation dies?

Thats not an unfair question.

If you always put limit on everything you do, physical or anything else. It will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them.” - Bruce Lee.

...
 I Yearn for a world where chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned.

Offline Shorts,David

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 627
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #56 on: August 26, 2021, 11:01:28 PM »
[quote author=Tom McClain link=topic=60052.msg620094#msg620094 date

The premise of this thread is flawed. It is not modelers vs pilots, it is the pop culture of laziness and instant gratification and the unwillingness to persist at anything that requires work and a pursuit of excellence that is the enemy of sports, hobbies, and the search for personal excellence.


That's just a great quote.
So, a few reflections,
1.  If you love cl, try not to get so mad at someone with the same passion? Just different perspectives is all. It's not like we're arguing over coke vs Pepsi.

2. Matt and Tom, Matt, you may have misread what Tom said because you two said the same thing about aviation not being as cool to kids as it used to be. Also Matt, Woke was not part of the discussion, Gerry just didn't know what it was, it was a total aside. And nicely defined.

3. Our hobby in decline? I can hardly believe it ever got popular based on just how incredibly prohibitive it was and remains to this day. It's the single most difficult hobby to get involved in I've ever heard of...times 5!  Which makes us all people of great fortitude, like, way over the top fortitude.

4. If we were serious about growing,
 A. We would hold an event a year at a local venue, church or school yard.
 B. We would have a tough beginners arf available for any newbies. Think Chinese foam rtf nobler Jr .
 C. We would create a school packet (I'm hoping to demo one this year at my elementary) for use by scouts or after school programs that teaches some science, building, and flying. Schools have millions in their STEM funds for such purposes. Estes rockets has tons of school materials that programs frequently use. AMA has material too that I will use and modify for control line if I get to it.
 D. I was keeping this secret and invested some money in it years ago, but we could easily (to a programmer) create a fun 2D flying game using the accelerometer by tipping the phone like a cl handle, that is secretly a control line trainer. And it will make tons of money. I have all the details if someone wants to contact me on that one. Just play the game bike race on a phone to know what I'm getting at.

5. Back to the original thread, here's another thought, some say they don't have time for building. But there are many others who are having such a great time building, they have no time left for flying. Building is not the obstacle to the hobby. Building is of itself a rewarding hobby. Obviously not for everyone as has been stated.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2021, 11:26:55 PM by Shorts,David »

Offline Trostle

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3344
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #57 on: August 27, 2021, 12:57:08 AM »

(Clip)

I knew that information, I was AT the competition in 2004 flying in expert when Orestes flew the Legacy in advanced. I also flew against Yuri and his Shark in 2004.

Please dont proclaim to know what I do and dont comprehend.

(Clip)

I didnt "belittle" anyone, if that was your interpretation of my comments, then your entitled to form them, but Im telling you that was far from my point.

(Clip)


I have no idea what you do or do not comprehend .  I do know that you slandered our current National Champion.  What you saw and experienced in 2004 has nothing to do with what you wrote on this thread on Aug 23, 2021 at 04:03:38PM:

"When your National Champion gets away with flying what is clearly a Yatsenko Shark and noone *really* cares because he has won so many and won the worlds."

You questioned the integrity of our current National Champion.  He did not "get away" (your words) with anything.  Now, you state that you "knew that information".  So, if you knew that Orestes built his model, why did you suggest otherwise?  You were wrong and your implication was totally inappropriate.

Your retraction of your statement from this thread is a poor excuse for an apology.

Keith





Offline jerry v

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 203
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #58 on: August 27, 2021, 09:58:33 AM »
We are builders/ modellers first. Starting from childhood. Building sand castles in the sandbox, plastic display models, free flight models, CL, RC models. Gradually we came to the point of first flight. Was it our own model or somebody else model - it did not matter. We started  enjoying flying.  If rules of competition required certain features or BOM, or else- there is always a choice to participate or not to participate in the competition. For recreational flying for own pleasure it’s a different story.

Jerry
Variety is the spice of life.

Offline Tom McClain

  • Charter Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *****
  • Posts: 347
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #59 on: August 27, 2021, 01:45:37 PM »
[quote author=Tom McClain link=topic=60052.msg620094#msg620094 date

The premise of this thread is flawed. It is not modelers vs pilots, it is the pop culture of laziness and instant gratification and the unwillingness to persist at anything that requires work and a pursuit of excellence that is the enemy of sports, hobbies, and the search for personal excellence.


That's just a great quote.
So, a few reflections,
1.  If you love cl, try not to get so mad at someone with the same passion? Justp different perspectives is all. It's not like we're arguing over coke vs Pepsi.

2. Matt and Tom, Matt, you may have misread what Tom said because you two said the same thing about aviation not being as cool to kids as it used to be. Also Matt, Woke was not part of the discussion, Gerry just didn't know what it was, it was a total aside. And nicely defined.

3. Our hobby in decline? I can hardly believe it ever got popular based on just how incredibly prohibitive it was and remains to this day. It's the single most difficult hobby to get involved in I've ever heard of...times 5!  Which makes us all people of great fortitude, like, way over the top fortitude.

4. If we were serious about growing,
 A. We would hold an event a year at a local venue, church or school yard.
 B. We would have a tough beginners arf available for any newbies. Think Chinese foam rtf nobler Jr .
 C. We would create a school packet (I'm hoping to demo one this year at my elementary) for use by scouts or after school programs that teaches some science, building, and flying. Schools have millions in their STEM funds for such purposes. Estes rockets has tons of school materials that programs frequently use. AMA has material too that I will use and modify for control line if I get to it.
 D. I was keeping this secret and invested some money in it years ago, but we could easily (to a programmer) create a fun 2D flying game using the accelerometer by tipping the phone like a cl handle, that is secretly a control line trainer. And it will make tons of money. I have all the details if someone wants to contact me on that one. Just play the game bike race on a phone to know what I'm getting at.

5. Back to the original thread, here's another thought, some say they don't have time for building. But there are many others who are having such a great time building, they have no time left for flying. Building is not the obstacle to the hobby. Building is of itself a rewarding hobby. Obviously not for everyone as has been stated.

All of what you suggest has happened since the advent of  Control Line in the 1940s with Jimmy Walker and the American Junior Company, Stanzel, Cleveland, Enterprise, Top Flite, SIG, Veco, Fox, the list is endless as well as the huge meets where up to 100,000 people would show up for the Plymouth Internats as well as the first AMA National Meets that were hosted by the US Navy at Willow Grove, Chicago, Lake Charles, Washington DC. Aviation was of the major interest because of the two World Wars and the admiration of pilots and anything aviation oriented.

Beginner kits and ready to fly models were  available back then.   Kids would work their tails off with paper routes and mowing lawns to raise the funds to buy a kit and engine, dope, and fuel and clubs were everywhere.

AMA has school packets but the interest has to be there.  Kids are not enamored with aviation let alone the space program anymore.  They are on line with social media and the desire for 15 minutes of fame.  The Pop Culture has ruined the country.

So, until you can come up with a cure for the pop culture, hobbies are not going to be on interest to kids or their parents.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2021, 04:14:53 PM by Tom McClain »
Tom McClain

Offline PJ Rowland

  • AUS - 29541 AMA - 809970
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2058
  • Melbourne - AUSTRALIA
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #60 on: August 27, 2021, 05:55:50 PM »
Keith.. Im not the type of person who is going to just sit down and accept misconstrued criticism.

This is what I said

]When your National Champion gets away with flying what is clearly a Yatsenko Shark and noone *really* cares because he has won so many and won the worlds.

I stand by this comment.

By "beef" is.. and has always been with uniqueness.

Ok I named Orestes, I have NO PROBLEM with him, what MY issue was and continues to be is a simple one..

What happens next ??

This is how I recall history and development.

George Aldrich I think Nobler
Bob Gieseke I think Gieseke Nobler
Les McDonald think Stilletto.
AL Rabe I think P51 semi scale
Paul Walker I think Impact
Dave Fitzgerald I think Thundergazer
Bob Hunt I think Genesis


I could continue to throw names about but we ALL know these names and the planes associated with those names. The reason is those people developed their own approach, I feel we are collectively missing out on that.

Thats what is being "let get away with".

Each to their own, but I always thought being National champion or even World champion meant you had it ALL. Plane, design, paint, trim, practice, ability, confidence the whole package from the ground up.

Thats just MY OPINION, its also my opinion that the World Champions in general bring something NEW to the table. The Shark is 18 years old now.  Imagine a design winning in 1978 STILL winning unchanged into 1996.

Discount the entire 1980s decade and any development.

That feels like we are missing out.. but it sounds like its just me..

Actually... given the impact was designed close to 30 years ago and Howard still flies it great  maybe my own point is invalid.
If you always put limit on everything you do, physical or anything else. It will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them.” - Bruce Lee.

...
 I Yearn for a world where chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned.

Offline Steve Thomas

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #61 on: August 27, 2021, 06:31:57 PM »
PJ, correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t your now-deleted post also impugn the integrity of those competing with Yatsenkos in F2B? Not just suggest that it would be better if everyone designed and built their own models (as your last post implies), but actually use words like ‘cheat’ and ‘integrity’?
And surely it’s a bit of a stretch to claim that someone who builds an existing design is ‘getting away with’ anything.

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13773
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #62 on: August 27, 2021, 06:55:42 PM »
PJ, correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t your now-deleted post also impugn the integrity of those competing with Yatsenkos in F2B? Not just suggest that it would be better if everyone designed and built their own models (as your last post implies), but actually use words like ‘cheat’ and ‘integrity’?
And surely it’s a bit of a stretch to claim that someone who builds an existing design is ‘getting away with’ anything.

   There are *plenty* of people who figure that, if they don't like the rules and think they should be changed, by extension, everyone who wins while exploiting the rules they don't like is "cheating" (or something less inflammatory).

    Just as an example - the case of pre-sheeted foam wings is a classic. Those who think they should be illegal, and also those who think there should be no BOM, tend to point the finger at people using pre-sheeted foam wings as "cheating", thus proving either they are undeserving, or that the rules themselves are bogus and therefore should be done away with. Pre-sheeted foam wings have been around since the early 70's, everyone from GMA on down has found them acceptable under the BOM and it simply isn't a problem in real life. But you can seem *many* threads here, including PJ's original post, that call anyone who uses them "cheaters" and therefore don't deserve what they have gotten.

    Same with ARCs - I never once thought that the "2005 interpretation" that allowed ARCs to get appearance points was correct, nor that it was ever really a rule, since it was never even presented to, much less voted on, by the contest board. It seemed like, frankly, an abomination. But, given that it was a de facto rule, I hold no ill will and I don't think less of people who took advantage of it - they followed the rules as they were, not as I wanted them to be.  I am *very glad* that it was finally done away with.

     It's perfectly fine to think the rules should be different and anyone who does should avail themselves of the rule change process. I figure I will put in mine, everyone else puts in theirs, and let the CB sort it all out. I do have a big problem when you call people operating within the rules, even if they are bad rules, as some sort of sham.

     Brett
« Last Edit: August 27, 2021, 09:25:52 PM by Brett Buck »

Offline Trostle

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3344
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #63 on: August 27, 2021, 07:11:35 PM »
Keith.. Im not the type of person who is going to just sit down and accept misconstrued criticism.

This is what I said

]When your National Champion gets away with flying what is clearly a Yatsenko Shark and noone *really* cares because he has won so many and won the worlds.

I stand by this comment.

By "beef" is.. and has always been with uniqueness.

Ok I named Orestes, I have NO PROBLEM with him, what MY issue was and continues to be is a simple one..

What happens next ??


OK, so now that you have defined your terms and you claim that you did not intend to disparage the our current National Champion who is also the current World Champion.  My question to you is why should anyone "care" (your term) if his airplane happens to look like a design from someone else?  To forbid the use of a non original design has never been in our AMA rules and has never been in the FAI rules.  That has never been a criteria before an individual can enter a contest.

You bring up an interesting point about OUR National Champions by listing a few of them and their airplanes.  I have a list of all of out National Champions since the appearance of the Walker Cup (which if for the United States National Stunt Champion).  Except for a few names prior to 1956, I think it is safe to say all of these Champions used their own design models to win the Walker Cup.  There is possibly one more recent exception and that is Bob Baron who won 1996 with a design that he explained as basically a Pattern Master which is not his design.

Also, it could be argued that the Gieseki Nobler is basically still a Nobler.

But, SO WHAT?

Our current National Champion (and current World Champion) did not "get away" with anything because his airplane "looks" like anothere design.  What rule was violated.  Where is the "Standard" that requires something "original" before a winning a major contest?  I do not know your rules in Australia.  Do they require such a standard?  If not, then why should you be concerned with what we do here in the United States.  You are still completely wrong by suggesting our National Champion "got away with something.

So, what do you think should "happen next"?  What is an "original design"?  A famous writer of a Control Line column in one of our magazines wrote in the 1960's that you could paint all of the CL stunt ships gray, and you would not be able to tell much difference between them.  The improvements that have been made over the years, particularly the last 10 to 20 years is not so much in design but in propulsion systems and trimming.

Your issue (imagined?) still does not warrant your disparagement of a great flyer and a really nice person.

Keith
« Last Edit: August 28, 2021, 07:07:37 AM by Trostle »

Offline Shorts,David

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 627
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #64 on: August 28, 2021, 12:12:55 AM »
Cool thing. Model airplanes are still incredibly fascinating to kids. Just fly at a soccer field or church as I do and watch the kids put down their phones and watch. They are fascinated, probably all of them. But that's where it ends because the entry point, let alone the knowledge and skills base require human guidance most of the time and is not what the instant gratification generation will commit to. 

Here's an idea for a new competition class. Not that it would have enough interest, but you could have an Originals Class. You can only fly planes you designed (including modifications to existing planes to make it your own unique touch.) Just a fun idea of course. I've done six originals in ten years. Two stink, and four were worse. But the two that stink could still make it through the pattern. But number six was showing real promise.
Anyone else ever seen the 4/40 rod snap at the threads between the belcranks and flap horn? It was hardware taken from a brodak arf. Maybe cheap pot metal.

Offline Trostle

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3344
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #65 on: August 28, 2021, 12:58:13 AM »

Here's an idea for a new competition class. Not that it would have enough interest, but you could have an Originals Class.


What makes an airplane "original"?  This is one of the problems when there were 40 appearance points, where 10 of those points were for "originality".

Does clipping the wing tips off of a Nobler make it "original"?  For the years that provision was in the rule book, there was never an explanation for what "originality" was.

Keith

Offline Trostle

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3344
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #66 on: August 28, 2021, 07:05:26 AM »

Here's an idea for a new competition class. Not that it would have enough interest, but you could have an Originals Class. You can only fly planes you designed (including modifications to existing planes to make it your own unique touch.


So, would Bob Gieseki get full credit for originality with his modified (several versions) Noblers?

Keith

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6190
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #67 on: August 28, 2021, 07:21:11 AM »
So, would Bob Gieseki get full credit for originality with his modified (several versions) Noblers?

Keith
When he was at his peak, it wouldn't matter, he would have beaten us anyway! LL~

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Derek Barry

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2832
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #68 on: August 28, 2021, 07:53:42 AM »
Considering the fact that I have known Orestes longer than most of the people pontificating about him, I guess I'll jump into this mess. Orestes is a dear friend of mind, and I talk to him quite often. I have known him long before he ever came to his first Nats. Let me first state, that all of you jumping on PJ and telling him he doesn't know what he is taking about, might want to check your own so called facts. The original 2007 winning plane was approved by Warren, which many people believe was a mistake.  Orestes did the right thing, and presented his construction photos to Warren, to see if it met the BOM requirements. Warren determined it did, and that was that. What followed in years after were multiple "sharks" and then new variations of the original design. Things really started getting heated about the whole situation around 2010. While at the World Champs, the late Bill Rich and I had a conversation with the Yatzenkos to determine the level of "kit" that people were buying to compete at our Nats. Turns out, the "kit" was a RTF with very little assembly required.  They came in a base coat of white, that was absolutely perfect and only required trim colors to be applied for an 18 point finish. 

When I got home from the world's, I recruited 2 other people to write a new BOM to specifically ban the molded RTFs from competition.  After many tries, we were successful,  and that is the BOM we have today. Now, the only way to use one of those models "legally" is if you lay it up in the mold yourself.  This is exactly the intent of the BOM!

Orestes has his own molds now, so any future discussion about his plane is moot. However, to blast PJ because of the history of the shark, and it's introduction to AMA stunt, is out of line. I do not believe the original Shark from 2007 met our BOM standards, Orestes knows I feel this way. We have discussed it at length. I came in second to him that year by 1.5 points, but I hold no ill will towards him. He is a gentleman, and a great friend. 

Derek
« Last Edit: August 28, 2021, 08:45:40 AM by Derek Barry »

Offline Shorts,David

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 627
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #69 on: August 28, 2021, 09:26:41 AM »
What makes an airplane "original"?  This is one of the problems when there were 40 appearance points, where 10 of those points were for "originality".

Does clipping the wing tips off of a Nobler make it "original"?  For the years that provision was in the rule book, there was never an explanation for what "originality" was.

Keith

I won't be able to give a definition of course. And it wouldn't matter unless anyone is seriously interested in having The class. But for arguments sake...tons of our "original" planes were alterations of existing models. So, I'd say sure. Probably the litmus test would be,
1. "to you knowledge, does anyone else have the exact same model as yours? AND if so,
2. was yours the first?".
I don't think there'd be much interest, but if enough think like PJ there could be enough for a class at a contest here or there. I'd sign up. I don't think there are any people that are so high strung they'd have a fit, at least not in California.

Offline Tom McClain

  • Charter Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *****
  • Posts: 347
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #70 on: August 28, 2021, 09:54:20 AM »
Considering the fact that I have known Orestes longer than most of the people pontificating about him, I guess I'll jump into this mess. Orestes is a dear friend of mind, and I talk to him quite often. I have known him long before he ever came to his first Nats. Let me first state, that all of you jumping on PJ and telling him he doesn't know what he is taking about, might want to check your own so called facts. The original 2007 winning plane was approved by Warren, which many people believe was a mistake.  Orestes did the right thing, and presented his construction photos to Warren, to see if it met the BOM requirements. Warren determined it did, and that was that. What followed in years after were multiple "sharks" and then new variations of the original design. Things really started getting heated about the whole situation around 2010. While at the World Champs, the late Bill Rich and I had a conversation with the Yatzenkos to determine the level of "kit" that people were buying to compete at our Nats. Turns out, the "kit" was a RTF with very little assembly required.  They came in a base coat of white, that was absolutely perfect and only required trim colors to be applied for an 18 point finish. 

When I got home from the world's, I recruited 2 other people to write a new BOM to specifically ban the molded RTFs from competition.  After many tries, we were successful,  and that is the BOM we have today. Now, the only way to use one of those models "legally" is if you lay it up in the mold yourself.  This is exactly the intent of the BOM!

Orestes has his own molds now, so any future discussion about his plane is moot. However, to blast PJ because of the history of the shark, and it's introduction to AMA stunt, is out of line. I do not believe the original Shark from 2007 met our BOM standards, Orestes knows I feel this way. We have discussed it at length. I came in second to him that year by 1.5 points, but I hold no ill will towards him. He is a gentleman, and a great friend. 

Derek

Well Derek, you have managed to throw shade and smoke on something that has been been settled by many, Warren, Keith, Brett, Randi, myself, and many others, that Orestes did fulfill the 51% criteria in building his Shark.  He got the Yatsenkos to do something they did not want to do, namely, provide him with a Shark kit consisting of wing skins, spars, fuselage shells, skins for the horizontal tail, vertical fin, flying surfaces, formers for everything, and then he had to build fixtures to jig all together so that the plane was true.  He glued it all together and installed the controls, landing gear, and all the other things we do to build a competition ship.

The Yatsenkos did not want to provide him with kits because they did not trust anyone except themselves to build the Shark correctly.

When I  got done with my research interviewing Warren and Orestes, there was no doubt he had met the BOM requirement.  If you and others did not think so, you should have challenged Orestes and Warren officially at the NATS, but you didn't.  Case closed.

I didn’t need to know Orestes for years to realize he met the requirements of AMA BOM.

This thread is really about why control line aerobatics is  dying.  BOM was posited as the reason.  Wrong!!  The reason is the Pop Culture and its corrosive effect on all who do not want to work diligently at something, but seek out the quick and easy way to your 15 minutes of fame on social media.  Persistence, diligence, rugged individualism, and the dogged pursuit of personal excellence are sneered at now and thought as Whitey's World and Racist.  Newly introduced men, women, boys, and girls to control line want to be able to do all of it immediately and get frustrated when they are confronted with the reality of the need to persist and hard practice.

There are no short cuts skills that require hard work, education, the dogged pursuit of personal excellence, refusal to accept good enough, and the desire to continually improve.
« Last Edit: August 28, 2021, 10:15:14 AM by Tom McClain »
Tom McClain

Offline Doug Moon

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2199
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #71 on: August 28, 2021, 10:10:54 AM »
Tom,

51% was never part of the BOM. I had heard that when I started but once I read the BOM it was never in there. At least not in my time and I came up through this right at the same time Orestes did.

This thread is not about control line dying.  Read the original post again. It's about the joy he gets when he builds his own stuff.  Others have changed the narrative.

If I were of the younger generation and read what you have written many times in this thread I would never want to do anything with you.



I get so tired of old guys ripping on young guys for not having the same interests they do.  Or going about things the same way. It's so old and tired. I have been reading and hearing that ever since I got into control line. When I first flew control line Bob G was there doing full patterns.  I didn't know what that was but I wanted to do it on the very first day I flew. I am sure there were old guys who grew up in the 30s ripping on young boys growing up in the 50s for being "instant gratification and lazy types"   I taught my son to build and fly. He mostly built his own profile and soloed on it as well. Took about 6 months of trying to really get flying down.  Then he was done. Not because he is an instant gratification kid and lazy.  But because his interests lie elsewhere, basketball, baseball, and yes the very dreaded words video games.  And sometimes just sitting around doing a bunch of nothing.  That's ok too. Alot of good ideas come from really bored kids.  He has the rest of his life to work and try to make ends meet.

People get ripped on for video games.  But in today's world there is actually alot of skill and insanely quick thinking and decision making going on and to get good at complex online video games where you play live against other people it takes a ton of practice. Many games have a practice SIM so you can home your skills before you enter into the fray. I know this because there are a few games I like to play but at 52 my decision making process cant keep up with the younger guys. My son at 14 can get outplayed by 10 year olds due to their ability to think quickly with clear minds.  It is simply amazing at times. 

I know Tom dismissed Matt's post but Matt was right on the money.

The real thing that punched control line right in gut was the invention of the afforable radio control system.  That right there started the migration away from the circles towards the runway. 

 

I am quite certain in years past there were always those who worked hard and those who hardly worked. 

« Last Edit: August 28, 2021, 10:41:48 AM by Doug Moon »
Doug Moon
AMA 496454
Dougmoon12@yahoo.com

Offline Doug Moon

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2199
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #72 on: August 28, 2021, 10:16:27 AM »
  Socialism/Communism are (stupid) ideas intended to address class warfare. The USA is a classless society, "all men are created equal" and "equal protection" make class distinctions wrong and illegal.

    So, to implement socialism/communism, you first have to *create* class warfare. Enter the "woke" movement - everyone is out to screw everyone else, white men are the ultimate culprits behind it all, and for someone to succeed, someone else has to lose, because life is a zero-sum game. Take it seriously, and you *will* have class warfare  - at which point the socialists/communists can swoop in with their solution.

    Of course, it doesn't and can't solve the problem, all it does is pick different winners and losers, and in every single example so far, *greatly polarized* society into oligarchs and crushed almost everyone else into grinding inescapable poverty, while dragging down the entire system to second-world levels, far worse than it was originally.

    They have been surprisingly successful, but make no mistake, class/race/sex distinctions in the law are opposed to *every single formative principle*, and were the *alternate* and *far superior* solution to the ills of class warfare common in the Old World. The founding principles of the republic *are the correct solution to the problems of class distinction*, they set out to solve it once and for all, and as long as we all understand that, it does.

    Brett

I really wish there was a like button because I would have hit it about 1000000000000000000000 times. Great post. 
Doug Moon
AMA 496454
Dougmoon12@yahoo.com

Offline Derek Barry

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2832
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #73 on: August 28, 2021, 10:18:53 AM »
Well Derek, you have managed to throw shade and smoke on something that has been been settled by many, Warren, Keith, Brett, Randi, myself, and many others, that Orestes did fulfill the 51% criteria in building his Shark.  He got the Yatsenkos to do something they did not want to do, namely, provide him with a Shark kit consisting of wing skins, spars, fuselage shells, skins for the horizontal tail, vertical fin, flying surfaces, formers for everything, and then he had to build fixtures to jig all together so that the plane was true.  He glued it all together and installed the controls, landing gear, and all the other things we do to build a competition ship.

The Yatsenkos did not want to provide him with kits because they did not trust anyone except themselves to build the Shark correctly.

When I  got done with my research interviewing Warren and Orestes, there was no doubt he had met the BOM requirement.  If you and others did not think so, you should have challenged Orestes and Warren officially at the NATS, but you didn't.  Case closed.

This thread is really about why control line aerobatics is  dying.  BOM was posited as the reason.  Wrong!!  The reason is the Pop Culture and its corrosive effect on all who do not want to work diligently at something, but seek out the quick and easy way to your 15 minutes of fame on social media.  Persistence, diligence, rugged individualism, and the dogged pursuit of personal excellence are sneered at now and thought as Whitey's World and Racist.  Newly introduced men, women, boys, and girls to control line want to be able to do all of it immediately and get frustrated when they are confronted with the reality of the need to persist and hard practice.

I am fully aware of the decision you guys made, and every single one of you were wrong in that decision.  I don't need a history lesson from you, on things I was there for. (I know all about the Orestes only kit) If my memory is correct,  51% wasn't even in the AMA rule, that is something you guys came up with. I will go back and read the rule before we got it changed. Your terrible decision lead to a Nats with no less than 15 RTFs in competition.  Congratulations!!

While you and I might agree politically, you are obviously the same asshole you have always been.

Derek

Offline Tom McClain

  • Charter Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *****
  • Posts: 347
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #74 on: August 28, 2021, 10:40:41 AM »
I am fully aware of the decision you guys made, and every single one of you were wrong in that decision.  I don't need a history lesson from you, on things I was there for. (I know all about the Orestes only kit) If my memory is correct,  51% wasn't even in the AMA rule, that is something you guys came up with. I will go back and read the rule before we got it changed. Your terrible decision lead to a Nats with no less than 15 RTFs in competition.  Congratulations!!

While you and I might agree politically, you are obviously the same asshole you have always been.

Derek

I will say it again, you had your chance to  challenge the decision made by Warren and Oriestes's Shark as not BOM, but you and others remained silent.  Case closed.

Talk about sour grapes, and then you resort to use of profanity.  How droll and base.  Profanity is the refuge of those who cannot back up their argument in the arena of ideas.  I base my decisions and discourse on proven and demonstrable facts not feelings. How you reacted to my message tells me loads about your character or possible lack of.
Tom McClain

Offline Tom McClain

  • Charter Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *****
  • Posts: 347
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #75 on: August 28, 2021, 10:45:43 AM »
Tom,

51% was never part of the BOM. I had heard that when I started but once I read the BOM it was never in there. At least not in my time and I came up through this right at the same time Orestes did.

This thread is not about control line dying.  Read the original post again. It's about the joy he gets when he builds his own stuff.  Others have changed the narrative.

If I were of the younger generation and read what you have written many times in this thread I would never want to do anything with you

I get so tired of old guys ripping on young guys for not having the same interests they do.  Or going about things the same way. It's so old and tired. I have been reading and hearing that ever since I got into control line. When I first flew control line Bob G was there doing full patterns.  I didn't know what that was but I wanted to do it on the very first day I flew. I am sure there were old guys who grew up in the 30s ripping on young boys growing up in the 50s for being "instant gratification and lazy types"   I taught my son to build and fly. He mostly built his own profile and soloed on it as well. Took about 6 months of trying to really get flying down.  Then he was done. Not because he is an instant gratification kid and lazy.  But because his interests lie elsewhere, basketball, baseball, and yes the very dreaded words video games.  And sometimes just sitting around doing a bunch of nothing.  That's ok too. Alot of good ideas come from really bored kids.  He has the rest of his life to work and try to make ends meet.

People get ripped on for video games.  But in today's world there is actually alot of skill and insanely quick thinking and decision making going on and to get good at complex online video games where you play live against other people it takes a ton of practice. Many games have a practice SIM so you can home your skills before you enter into the fray. I know this because there are a few games I like to play but at 52 my decision making process cant keep up with the younger guys. My son at 14 can get outplayed by 10 year olds due to their ability to think quickly with clear minds.  It is simply amazing at times. 

I know Tom dismissed Matt's post but Matt was right on the money.

The real thing that punched control line right in gut was the invention of the afforable radio control system.  That right there started the migration away from the circles towards the runway. 

 

I am quite certain in years past there were always those who worked hard and those who hardly worked.

Doug, you throw invectives at me with no objective examples of what I have said or written that is hurtful or derogatory towards the younger generation.  Enlighten me.
Tom McClain

Offline Doug Moon

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2199
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #76 on: August 28, 2021, 10:47:43 AM »
I will say it again, you had your chance to  challenge the decision made by Warren and Oriestes's Shark as not BOM, but you and others remained silent.  Case closed.

Talk about sour grapes, and then you resort to use of profanity.  How droll and base.  Profanity is the refuge of those who cannot back up their argument in the arena of ideas.  I base my decisions and discourse on proven and demonstrable facts not feelings. How you reacted to my message tells me loads about your character or possible lack of.

I will stand by and vouch for Derek's character all day every day and then some.  I am certain many many many more will do the same.  You might want to pay a little more attention.
Doug Moon
AMA 496454
Dougmoon12@yahoo.com

Offline Derek Barry

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2832
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #77 on: August 28, 2021, 10:48:27 AM »
I will say it again, you had your chance to  challenge the decision made by Warren and Oriestes's Shark as not BOM, but you and others remained silent.  Case closed.

Talk about sour grapes, and then you resort to use of profanity.  How droll and base.  Profanity is the refuge of those who cannot back up their argument in the arena of ideas.  I base my decisions and discourse on proven and demonstrable facts not feelings. How you reacted to my message tells me loads about your character or possible lack of.

There was no way to challenge the ED'S call, because he is given the authority to make the call, as Event Director, in the rule!

Yes I use profanity, mainly because I like it. It says nothing about my character, or my ability to debate. You failed to address the fact that you guys made up your own 51% rule, and now you're using it to justify your terrible decision. 

You are correct that I am throwing shade on YOU and everyone involved in that decision,  because it created an atmosphere where, skirting the rules was accepted. (PJ'S point) Now you have the nerve to complain about being called on it. By my math, that still makes you an asshole!

Derek
« Last Edit: August 28, 2021, 11:28:33 AM by Derek Barry »

Offline Doug Moon

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2199
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #78 on: August 28, 2021, 10:48:59 AM »
Doug, you throw invectives at me with no objective examples of what I have said or written that is hurtful or derogatory towards the younger generation.  Enlighten me.


You write in a very derogatory way and constantly state yourself as the end all be all answer to whatever the question and or topic happens to be.  There is good example in this very thread.  You first posted the reason why CL is dying is because the younger generation are all lazy instant gratification types. Someone else posted what could be another reason and you came back and wrote the very same thing again stating your position was the correct position.

You should go back and read what you wrote.  But it wont make a difference because you are always right, except when you stated 51% was observed or whatever you said about it.   

51% was never in the rule and if you used that to make a decision about the BOM you were wrong to do so.
Doug Moon
AMA 496454
Dougmoon12@yahoo.com

Offline EricV

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #79 on: August 28, 2021, 10:59:45 AM »
I will say it again, you had your chance to  challenge the decision made by Warren and Oriestes's Shark as not BOM, but you and others remained silent.  Case closed.

Talk about sour grapes, and then you resort to use of profanity.  How droll and base.  Profanity is the refuge of those who cannot back up their argument in the arena of ideas.  I base my decisions and discourse on proven and demonstrable facts not feelings. How you reacted to my message tells me loads about your character or possible lack of.

Sorry, not buying that line. He defended his position quite well before he decided to add his personal assessment of you at the end. LOL! People who pick on language in the middle of an argument usually have no argument so they deflect. If we insist on there being a BOM then we have to have the stomach to enforce it, otherwise its just a worthless document that is not fair to the people who do choose to follow it.

Offline Doug Moon

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2199
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #80 on: August 28, 2021, 11:05:18 AM »
Sorry, not buying that line. He defended his position quite well before he decided to add his personal assessment of you at the end. LOL! People who pick on language in the middle of an argument usually have no argument so they deflect. If we insist on there being a BOM then we have to have the stomach to enforce it, otherwise its just a worthless document that is not fair to the people who do choose to follow it.

What he said.
Doug Moon
AMA 496454
Dougmoon12@yahoo.com

Offline Doug Moon

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2199
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #81 on: August 28, 2021, 11:11:51 AM »
Why would anyone ever think 51% was part of the rule? I do remember it being thrown around when I was first into competition.  But then I read the rule and it certainly wasn't in there.  I didn't know that was used in that case.  Interesting tid bit of information there.
Doug Moon
AMA 496454
Dougmoon12@yahoo.com

Offline SteveMoon

  • 2013 Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 774
    • www.ultrahobbyproducts.com
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #82 on: August 28, 2021, 11:22:22 AM »
Derek, Eric, Doug: BRAVO!

Later, Steve

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6190
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #83 on: August 28, 2021, 12:06:12 PM »
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Matt Colan

  • N-756355
  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3458
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #84 on: August 28, 2021, 12:16:57 PM »
Hey Tom, let me ask you this. Does all the hard work college and professional athletes put in rugged individualism? Or is that lazy, instant gratification too? I gave way too many friends that have put in hard work to get to where they are right now in this “lazy” generation. Just because they don’t build and play with toy airplanes does not make them lazy

PS. Eric Derek and Doug are 100% correct
Matt Colan

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13773
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #85 on: August 28, 2021, 01:52:37 PM »
Orestes has his own molds now, so any future discussion about his plane is moot. However, to blast PJ because of the history of the shark, and it's introduction to AMA stunt, is out of line. I do not believe the original Shark from 2007 met our BOM standards, Orestes knows I feel this way. We have discussed it at length. I came in second to him that year by 1.5 points, but I hold no ill will towards him. He is a gentleman, and a great friend. 


    I am not here to defend or accuse anyone - but, as you show, the point could have been made *without* throwing out accusations or resorting to fingerpointing and calling someone a cheat. I guarantee that will get about the same response no matter what the topic,  because some of us have had to deal with that sort of thing for 40ish years in the nastiest possible way, and have become highly sensitized to it.

  BTW, if someone had asked me, back in 2005 (or 96, or 88...)  on the general topic of BOM, I might have come to a different conclusion much closer to yours. Point being, once it was decided, it was time for me and everyone else to move on, and work to change the rules, not throw brickbats at those who used them.

      I think, ultimately, the right thing was done - get rid of the 2005 interpretation and then write a clear definition. It was unfortunate it took 6+ years, but that doesn't invalidate what happened in between.

       Brett

     

Offline Shorts,David

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 627
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #86 on: August 28, 2021, 02:14:26 PM »
I was going to open a new can of worms on a new thread, but this can will work.
1. Sounds like several of you would like to revisit the BOM rule and update it. The past is past, the present will be past, but the future is wide open for rules changes.\
          A. Sounds like several of you believe: If you did not lay up the molds yourself, you may not use both wing skins and fuselage skins on the same aircraft.
    If so, write the proposal, sounds like there may be support for it. The longer you wait, the harder it will be to change. If that's what I'm hearing.

2. Here's another idea that some may love or hate (I'm undecided), but I'm sure everyone will be very polite in expressing themselves, lol.
Scoresheet change: Remove appearance points. Replace with: Finisher of the model - 10pts (NOT 1-10). Builder of the Model - 10pts (NOT 1-10).  Nats still requires BOM.  However, 1. we have all seen OPINIONS by the appearance judge dramatically affect the outcome of contests. i.e. Dick Mathis Chizler for example. Bob Barron Monocote for example. Their amazing craftsmanship was not mainstream and didn't get equal points to someone else's amazing craftsmanship.

Does my ugly plane that I slaved over, built from scratch, labored over the paint job, etc, deserve as many points as your museum finish plane? Good question. But I'll guarantee that photos are being taken of yours, while babies are crying at mine. This also rules out many accusations of getting help, not doing equal work, etc. But, it still keeps in essence, we built these planes. We are craftsman. We are artists. We are more than pilots.

Will people stop doing nice work? Not a chance. Jim Aron doesn't make his planes look amazing because it'll put him in the top five or not, he does it because he loves to. And it's obvious from the craftsmanship that most of you are in the same boat regarding your goals although not necessarily the outcome. :)  FIRE AWAY - and possibly my 2nd point does have a tad of instant gratification in its core.
« Last Edit: August 28, 2021, 02:37:19 PM by Shorts,David »

Offline dale gleason

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 842
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #87 on: August 28, 2021, 02:41:55 PM »
The 51% BOM idea came from someone suggesting using a rule employed by EAA that a minimum of 51% of the plane had to be built by the builder in order to qualify as a "home-built". That suggestion took root in some minds as being an AMA stipulation.

I think.

dg

Offline PJ Rowland

  • AUS - 29541 AMA - 809970
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2058
  • Melbourne - AUSTRALIA
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #88 on: August 28, 2021, 06:40:11 PM »
It always descends into a dick measuring contest where opinions are given not formed.

Let me be clear.. Fly a Yatsenko Shark and you will receive zero respect for your results from me. If you have some form of intellectual issue with my concept of what constitutes a cheat then thats your problem not mine.

This has turned into BOM vs the world.

For such a small group of people YALL seem to be REALLY opinionated but forget Stunt is done in another place other than USA.




If you always put limit on everything you do, physical or anything else. It will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them.” - Bruce Lee.

...
 I Yearn for a world where chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned.

Offline Mike Griffin

  • 2018 Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2769
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #89 on: August 28, 2021, 08:17:49 PM »
Tell you what, here is an idea.  Next NATS or WORLDs, everybody flies a Shark.  That will level the playing field.  Let's see who comes out on top.  Just a little sarcasm as we are facing down and Cat 4 Hurricane down here. 

Mike

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6190
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #90 on: August 28, 2021, 09:48:10 PM »
Tell you what, here is an idea.  Next NATS or WORLDs, everybody flies a Shark.  That will level the playing field.  Let's see who comes out on top.  Just a little sarcasm as we are facing down and Cat 4 Hurricane down here. 

Mike
Head for the high ground, be safe and good luck!

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Mike Griffin

  • 2018 Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2769
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #91 on: August 28, 2021, 10:55:29 PM »
Head for the high ground, be safe and good luck!

Ken

Thanks Ken.  We are riding it out and it is going to be rough.

Mike

Offline RC Storick

  • Forum owner
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12421
  • The finish starts with the first piece of wood cut
    • Stunt Hangar
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #92 on: August 29, 2021, 04:12:58 AM »
Time for me to chime in with my Novel idea! LOL. I am from Missouri and it's called the show-me state for a reason. in the words of the late RR (trust but verify) To end this controversy for everyone take a VIDEO of the build. No excuses everyone has a camera (cell phone) Then there are not just pictures and paragraphs of the testimony of a build but a full log should it come into question.

If it walks, quacks and looks like a duck is most likely is a duck.

 Occam's razor or the principle of parsimony or law of parsimony is the problem-solving principle that "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity", sometimes inaccurately paraphrased as "the simplest explanation is usually the best one." Wikipedia
AMA 12366

Offline Avaiojet

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7468
  • Just here for the fun of it also.
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #93 on: August 29, 2021, 07:23:06 AM »
Time for me to chime in with my Novel idea! LOL. I am from Missouri and it's called the show-me state for a reason. in the words of the late RR (trust but verify) To end this controversy for everyone take a VIDEO of the build. No excuses everyone has a camera (cell phone) Then there are not just pictures and paragraphs of the testimony of a build but a full log should it come into question.

If it walks, quacks and looks like a duck is most likely is a duck.

 Occam's razor or the principle of parsimony or law of parsimony is the problem-solving principle that "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity", sometimes inaccurately paraphrased as "the simplest explanation is usually the best one." Wikipedia

Robert, I'm glad you brought Photos and Builds up. The Forum should have more of this type of participation.

Everyone of these models have a documented Build right here in Stunt Hanger.

If you lack inexperience in doing a "photo build," research these models and view the Builds.

It's so easy to do. A day at a time building and a daily photo explaining the work "you" did.

This alone eliminates all other possibilities and proves beyond a doubt, you are the BOM.

Yes, I'm so excited and proud to be the "Builder" of these models not to mention how enjoyable doing ALL the work is. IMHO, this is what a hobby is all about. ;D


Trump Derangement Syndrome. TDS. 
Avaiojet Derangement Syndrome. ADS.
Amazing how ignorance can get in the way of the learning process.
If you're Trolled, you know you're doing something right.  Alpha Mike Foxtrot. "No one has ever made a difference by being like everyone else."  Marcus Cordeiro, The "Mark of Excellence," you will not be forgotten. "No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot."- Mark Twain. I look at the Forum as a place to contribute and make friends, some view it as a Realm where they could be King.   Proverb 11.9  "With his mouth the Godless destroys his neighbor..."  "Perhaps the greatest challenge in modeling is to build a competitive control line stunter that looks like a real airplane." David McCellan, 1980.

Offline Dan Berry

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1063
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #94 on: August 29, 2021, 10:01:00 AM »
It always descends into a dick measuring contest where opinions are given not formed.

Let me be clear.. Fly a Yatsenko Shark and you will receive zero respect for your results from me. If you have some form of intellectual issue with my concept of what constitutes a cheat then thats your problem not mine.

This has turned into BOM vs the world.

For such a small group of people YALL seem to be REALLY opinionated but forget Stunt is done in another place other than USA.

Was reply #18 too subtle?

Offline Avaiojet

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7468
  • Just here for the fun of it also.
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #95 on: August 29, 2021, 10:21:02 AM »
Was reply #18 too subtle?

Thanks for the #18 heads up. I actually performed with a small Dance Company in my really early days.

Ballet and Jazz. Not just enjoying the Arts, but participating in them. These were great years and great gals!    ;D
Trump Derangement Syndrome. TDS. 
Avaiojet Derangement Syndrome. ADS.
Amazing how ignorance can get in the way of the learning process.
If you're Trolled, you know you're doing something right.  Alpha Mike Foxtrot. "No one has ever made a difference by being like everyone else."  Marcus Cordeiro, The "Mark of Excellence," you will not be forgotten. "No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot."- Mark Twain. I look at the Forum as a place to contribute and make friends, some view it as a Realm where they could be King.   Proverb 11.9  "With his mouth the Godless destroys his neighbor..."  "Perhaps the greatest challenge in modeling is to build a competitive control line stunter that looks like a real airplane." David McCellan, 1980.

Offline Dan Berry

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1063
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #96 on: August 29, 2021, 12:53:33 PM »
Thanks for the #18 heads up. I actually performed with a small Dance Company in my really early days.

Ballet and Jazz. Not just enjoying the Arts, but participating in them. These were great years and great gals!    ;D

 :) In fairness, it wasn't for you.
And it really has nothing to do with the theatre.

Offline Avaiojet

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7468
  • Just here for the fun of it also.
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #97 on: August 29, 2021, 01:12:29 PM »
:) In fairness, it wasn't for you.
And it really has nothing to do with the theatre.

I always thought Posts where for anyone who elected to reply?

I must have read it incorrectly.

Trump Derangement Syndrome. TDS. 
Avaiojet Derangement Syndrome. ADS.
Amazing how ignorance can get in the way of the learning process.
If you're Trolled, you know you're doing something right.  Alpha Mike Foxtrot. "No one has ever made a difference by being like everyone else."  Marcus Cordeiro, The "Mark of Excellence," you will not be forgotten. "No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot."- Mark Twain. I look at the Forum as a place to contribute and make friends, some view it as a Realm where they could be King.   Proverb 11.9  "With his mouth the Godless destroys his neighbor..."  "Perhaps the greatest challenge in modeling is to build a competitive control line stunter that looks like a real airplane." David McCellan, 1980.

Offline Dan Berry

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1063
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #98 on: August 29, 2021, 01:20:24 PM »
I always thought Posts where for anyone who elected to reply?

I must have read it incorrectly.

Oh! Absolutely. No problem there.
Look for a PM.

Offline Dan McEntee

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6914
Re: Modelers vs pilots
« Reply #99 on: August 29, 2021, 01:31:04 PM »
:) In fairness, it wasn't for you.
And it really has nothing to do with the theatre.

  Actually, Chuck's reading comprehensions skills absolutely suck. And he had trouble with numbers. He didn't even read the correct numbered post!  He just looks for any opportunity to post those same tired of photos of his hanger queens even when the thread is all about flying models, which we know he doesn't do either.

  Type at you later,
    Dan McEntee
AMA 28784
EAA  1038824
AMA 480405 (American Motorcyclist Association)


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here