You're right Pat, you're attacking the source - a basic no-no in logic. I would like your source proving that masks are helpful overall, really - can you provide one? Since even the CDC can't ...
Dennis
Actually I did not attack the source. I merely linked to some information about it so that others could make up their own mind.
But since you brought it up, the organization's name is in itself deceptive. It implies that they speak for all American doctors.
In fact they represent a tiny fraction, and should probably have the word "Libertarian" somewhere in their name.
Not saying there is anything wrong with that either, just that it would better describe them.
At least, according to their web site, they are funded by membership dues.
Based on their "unique" policy positions I had expected to find some involvement from the Koch brothers ( well, the single remaining one).
FWIW, here is some info in support of masks. Much like the links between smoking and cancer (that the AAPS also disputed) this is not proof.
Instead it presents evidence.
https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2020/06/417906/still-confused-about-masks-heres-science-behind-how-face-masks-preventAnd of course the image you posted demonstrates nothing. First of all it is just boilerplate lawyer's CYA.
And second it is not relevant, because it talks about protection to the wearer, which is not the point of wearing a mask.
A medical N95 respirator for example is not a proper mask to be worn by the general public, because of the exhale valve.