News:


  • April 27, 2024, 02:18:13 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: 1/2A Carrier  (Read 1083 times)

Offline john vlna

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1353
1/2A Carrier
« on: January 26, 2013, 10:29:40 PM »
There is a discussion of some 1/2A carrier planes on the 1/2A board that some may not have seen, so I have posted this just to alert you.
http://stunthanger.com/smf/index.php?topic=29888.msg293190#new

Offline Mike Anderson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 945
Re: 1/2A Carrier
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2013, 09:18:45 AM »
John -

In our old thread on this history of the rules and versions, I posted the 1952 newsletter which outline the 1953 Nats rules:

http://stunthanger.com/smf/index.php?topic=24848.msg244482#msg244482

Those original rules had provision for a 1/2A class, but I've never seen any reference to it actually being flown -even at the Nats.  Locally, I had a couple of 1/2A models that I was flying with the Cox 3-line handle and a Cox reedy with a rotating cylinder throttle baffle that flew really well.  I even built one with a TD, but never got the plane completed.  Never got anyone else interested in trying it though.  I wonder if there is any record of the original 1/2A event being contested?
Mike@   AMA 10086
Central Iowa

Offline john vlna

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1353
Re: 1/2A Carrier
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2013, 10:48:34 AM »
Mike,
Thanks for the rules ref.

In the late 60's and early 70's we had 1/2a carrier contests in our area, (Wash DC) , and so did Cleveland. In fact one of the Winning airplanes from that time was raffled off at our Christmas party this year. It was a .049, reed valve. With a exhaust throttle restrict or. The plane was a sig skyray.
John
« Last Edit: January 27, 2013, 11:49:32 AM by john vlna »

Offline Duke.Johnson

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 713
Re: 1/2A Carrier
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2013, 09:37:28 PM »
Mike,
Thanks for the rules ref.

In the late 60's and early 70's we had 1/2a carrier contests in our area, (Wash DC) , and so did Cleveland. In fact one of the Winning airplanes from that time was raffled off at our Christmas party this year. It was a .049, reed valve. With a exhaust throttle restrict or. The plane was a sig skyray.
John
John
That proto type I've been working on is a Skyray.  I need one more part to finish.

Offline Duke.Johnson

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 713
Re: 1/2A Carrier
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2013, 10:24:41 PM »
Here's how the proto-type 1/2A carrier plane turned out.

Offline john vlna

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1353
Re: 1/2A Carrier
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2013, 05:52:50 PM »
looks nice. Have you run that carb yet?

Offline Douglas Ames

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1299
Re: 1/2A Carrier
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2013, 10:32:53 PM »
You know, with the advent of 2.4 gHz, a 2-line 1/2A Carrier model might work nicely!
The excuse was always that you couldn't operate the 3rd line (throttle) due to the poor line tension, plus the weight of the third line was a drag - literally. Could be fun and cheap!
AMA 656546

If you do a little bit every day it will get done, or you can do it tomorrow.

Offline Duke.Johnson

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 713
Re: 1/2A Carrier
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2013, 08:24:22 AM »
looks nice. Have you run that carb yet?

No, I've been teaching after work for a while now and have not had much time.  I have one more night of testing for my class and should have more time.  I have two new carrier planes to test run, hopefully this weekend.

Offline Duke.Johnson

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 713
Re: 1/2A Carrier
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2013, 08:27:32 AM »
You know, with the advent of 2.4 gHz, a 2-line 1/2A Carrier model might work nicely!
The excuse was always that you couldn't operate the 3rd line (throttle) due to the poor line tension, plus the weight of the third line was a drag - literally. Could be fun and cheap!

I'd like to make it work with a third line.  But if I have to I'll try 2.4.  Cox made throttle handles at one time and plastic models for them.  Just playing around with it.


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here