News:



  • June 06, 2024, 03:21:39 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: tank fabrication?  (Read 4348 times)

Offline Scott Richlen

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2094
tank fabrication?
« on: April 29, 2011, 08:48:23 PM »
You guys have any tips on metal tank fabrication?  What type of soldering tool works best? techniques? solder?

Thanks,
Scott

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12829
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2011, 09:48:40 PM »
Lots of stuff will work.  You need to know how to solder -- forgive me if I'm preaching to the choir, but the three most important things you need to make a good solder joint are cleanliness, cleanliness, and cleanliness.  Next comes tight fitting joints and a decent flux.  After that comes a good soldering iron.  Get the joint clean and well fitting, use a halfway decent flux, and you could probably melt the solder with a candle flame and do a good job.

Some folks like the soldering "guns" that Weller makes.  They're OK, but I think they get too hot and then cool down too fast when you hit them with solder.  I have a really massive soldering iron that I call 'Bertha' -- I inherited it from my uncle, and I think it dates to the 1940's.  Because of the mass, it doesn't change temperature much when you put solder on, which makes the whole soldering experience pleasant.  The last time I soldered a tank I used a propane torch -- I think I could get to like it, but Bertha is better.  Serious old-time sheet metal workers used something called a soldering "shoe", which is a honking big chunk of copper on a stick, heated in a little propane or electric furnace.  It works like a soldering iron, except it doesn't heat itself.  Since the tinplate that we use for tanks is so thin, I suspect that a little 40 watt electronics soldering iron would work, but I haven't tried it.

So -- what were you planning on making the tank out of?  How were you planning on bending it?  Etc.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Bill Little

  • 2017
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12671
  • Second in COMMAND
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2011, 09:57:20 PM »
HI Scott,

Personally, I use a Weller, or Craftsman, 100/140 Watt gun for the soldering, but many will say that an "iron" will work best.  I am too impatient for the iron, they take too long to heat up! LOL!!  Either way, after about 50  years of soldering, both are good for the job.  Getting every thing clean is very important, plus using a good flux and I use rosin core most of the time.  Stay Brite "Silver Solder" (not true silver solder) works pretty good, too.  It melts at a slightly lower temp.  Making good bends and fits between the parts is very important.  Solder will not really work good to fill gaps.  I punch the holes for the tubing with a scratch awl since it leaves a bit of material flanged around the hole to help create a better joint.  And you already know that copper tubing is better than brass for the tank plumbing.  

I have a pine "buck" carved to 2" wide and 1" deep like the traditional Veco tanks to form the tank body from.  A pair of Vise Grip "sheet metal pliers" is good for the job of bending the tin.  A pair of sheet metal tongs will work if you have them along with good sheet metal shears.  Regular soldering techniques apply, just sweat solder the joints.

Edit: Tim typed faster than I did! LOL!!

Big Bear
Big Bear <><

Aberdeen, NC

James Hylton Motorsports/NASCAR/ARCA

AMA 95351 (got one of my old numbers back! ;D )

Trying to get by

Offline bill bischoff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1709
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2011, 10:11:56 PM »
I've probably built over 100 metal tanks, and here's what works for me. I use K&S easy-solder tin (which is tin plated steel) and K&S brass or copper tubing. If the tubes only stick out of the tank a half inch or so, I'll usually use the hard brass or copper; if the tubes stick out enough to reach outside of the fuselage, or especially if the tubes may need to be bent AFTER the tank is built, I'll use the soft brass. I use regular tin/lead rosin core electrical solder, with additional paste flux as required. I tried silver solder such as Sta-Brite and found it to be brittle and prone to cracking. Lately I am using a cheap Hobbico $10.00 pencil type soldering iron with a flat screwdriver-type tip. Surprisingly, I find it gets plenty hot enough.

Start with a wooden block. I've used basswood, pine, maple, and even hard nasty balsa wood. The size and shape of the tank and the size of the available metal will dictate where the seams will be. Typically a tank will have a main body, a front cover, and a back cover. Solder the body together first, then the front cover, then the tubes, then the rear cover. All seams should have an overlapped "flap" of 1/8" to 3/16". The overlapping flaps can be on the inside or the outside of the tank, whatever fits and/or looks best. On the body of the tank, try to have the seam(s) at a corner rather than in the middle of a flat side. Make the holes for the tubes with an awl or ice pick rather than a drill. This creates a bit of a flange for easier soldering. All the tubes should be tack soldered to the inside of the tank. If the tubes are only soldered where they emerge from the tank and not on the inside, cracks can develop from vibration. Once the tank is finished, pressure test it under water and look for leaks, then flush it with dope thinner to remove  any soldering flux. With a new tank especially, use a fuel filter to catch any stray material that may work its way out. Actually, always use a fuel filter.

I'm sure that others will have other methods and ideas that will work just as well. I don't think any of it is super critical as long as you get the desired end result. What I will say is don't be afraid to abort and start over if it isn't turning out right. I have found that the more I try to rescue a botched job, the worse it gets and the more time is wasted. I still have to remind myself sometimes....

Offline Allan Perret

  • 2017
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1892
  • Proverbs
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2011, 06:54:50 AM »
From what direction do you punch the holes for tubes, to put the flange on inside or outside of tank ?
Or does it make a difference ?
Allan Perret
AMA 302406
Slidell, Louisiana

Offline bill bischoff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1709
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2011, 07:15:10 AM »
It looks nicer if you punch from the outside in.

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22792
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2011, 07:53:23 AM »
Also easier. LL~ LL~ Over on Stuka Stunt, Al Rabe has a pictoral on building his planes.   In one of them he shows how he makes his tanks to fit his airplane designs.  It may take a while to find it, but it is there.  And like building planes, it takes practice to get it right.  I am still trying to get it right. H^^
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10478
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #7 on: April 30, 2011, 03:34:01 PM »
I make a cardboard mock-up of the tank. Get it to fit where I want it to fit. then  unfold the cardboard and use it as a template to cut the tin for the tank. This is pretty much how Al Rabe does it. I've been doing this since I was a kid and my cousin that got me started on all this stuff taught me. It still works.

And Tim I punch the hole into the tank so that the "flange" you get is on the inside.
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell

Offline Scott Richlen

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2094
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #8 on: April 30, 2011, 08:23:17 PM »
Here's my tank, so far.  It is made of DuPont lacquer can stock.


Note the block to the left.  The tank is 1 1/2 inches thick since the Legacy has a short nose and a regular tank is too long to fit.

Offline bill bischoff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1709
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #9 on: April 30, 2011, 09:21:30 PM »
Looks like a tank to me!

Offline Bill Little

  • 2017
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12671
  • Second in COMMAND
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2011, 09:30:20 PM »
Looks just fine, Scott!  Give it a good washing out and a pressure test under water.  it should be good to go.

Big Bear
Big Bear <><

Aberdeen, NC

James Hylton Motorsports/NASCAR/ARCA

AMA 95351 (got one of my old numbers back! ;D )

Trying to get by

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12829
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #11 on: April 30, 2011, 10:41:28 PM »
Scott, I take it that that bitty little iron worked out OK for you?

I recognize the tube of flux -- if it's the same stuff I have, it's very persistent.  I get it out by filling the tank with hot water and dishwashing detergent (Dawn, Joy, etc), and shaking vigorously.  Then I rinse the tank until there's no sign of soap.  Finally, if I want to put the tank into service soon, I give it a rinse with isopropyl alcohol.

I use Dole pineapple cans for my tanks -- they're not as pretty as lacquer thinner cans, but I eat more pineapple than I make tanks.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10478
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #12 on: May 01, 2011, 11:31:00 AM »
Tim,

Yea, I rinse tanks with a very diluted mix of soap and hot water. Then I rinse with lacquer thinner.
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell

Offline Howard Rush

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7818
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #13 on: May 01, 2011, 06:40:16 PM »
I made my last few tanks the way that Scott makes cowls (I used a vacuum pump running continuously, though).  There are two tricks: 1) at least one layer of material has to be nonporous, and 2) use Epikote 862 resin.  Here's the lowdown on a slightly fancier method: http://www.nclra.org/WayneTrivin/CompositeTanks.html .  Although I don't see from the MSDS for the resin or hardener that either is any more dangerous than other stuff we use, both guys I knew of who made tanks this way are deceased, and some blame the resin. 
The Jive Combat Team
Making combat and stunt great again

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12829
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #14 on: May 01, 2011, 07:55:47 PM »
Somewhere out in cyberspace there's a web site by a Dutch guy who makes his own combat engines, and makes fuel tanks out of balsa wood laminated with aluminum foil.  The aluminum foil provides fuel proof-ness, the balsa provides structure.  Everything is glued up with epoxy.

I can't find his website though.  The most amazing thing wasn't the fact that he makes his own engines (that's impressive), or that he makes fuel tanks out of balsa (amazing, impressive, and even sensible when you think about it), but that his girlfriend helps him assemble engines.  Now that's impressive (and she's a keeper).
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10478
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #15 on: May 01, 2011, 08:21:52 PM »
What's the life expectancy of a carbon fuel tank? Or a balsa one/
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell

Online Lauri Malila

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1638
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #16 on: May 02, 2011, 09:36:53 AM »
Somewhere out in cyberspace there's a web site by a Dutch guy who makes...

 That would be Loet Wakkerman. If I remember right, he made the balsa/alu foil tanks for Diesel combat, not for the FAI combat where everyone uses bladder tanks. I think that his website still exixts. L

Offline Howard Rush

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7818
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #17 on: May 02, 2011, 12:46:49 PM »
What's the life expectancy of a carbon fuel tank? Or a balsa one/

I thought they'd get soggy after awhile.  They do if you use the wrong resin.  Dave Fitzgerald had many flights on his, which convinced me to try it.  It's the bees' knees if your plane is nose-heavy.
The Jive Combat Team
Making combat and stunt great again

Offline Howard Rush

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7818
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #18 on: May 02, 2011, 12:52:32 PM »
Back to one of your original questions: it looks like you are using Stay-Brite, which is the solder of choice.
The Jive Combat Team
Making combat and stunt great again

Offline FLOYD CARTER

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4462
    • owner
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #19 on: May 02, 2011, 01:45:27 PM »
I struggled for years with a 150 Watt soldering "gun".  Now I get excellent soldering results using a portable soldering iron that uses butane.  No flame;  the butane internally heats a massive copper tip nearly 1/2" wide.  Does a real number on K&S tin stock!  I use 60-40 radio solder from Radio Shack.

Floyd
90 years, but still going (mostly)
AMA #796  SAM #188  LSF #020

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10478
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #20 on: May 02, 2011, 01:55:49 PM »
I use a heavy duty Weller solder gun. It's, I think, 300W. Works pretty well, but I also have a backup soldering iron if needed. The old big stick type.
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell

Offline Scott Richlen

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2094
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #21 on: May 03, 2011, 07:06:35 PM »
Thanks for all the help everyone!

Yes, I am not pleased with the iron I am using.  I think it is about a 35 or 50 watt normally used for stain-glass window crafting.  It works with the stain glass solder but doesn't seem to get hot enough for the silver solder.  Is that a common problem?

I have also had mixed results with the flux that comes with the Stay-brite solder, thus that other tube of flux that you can see.

How big an electric iron should I get?  I already have a Weller for electronics but that doesn't have enough mass at the tip.  I would also be interested in the butane, flameless.  Do you recall the brand-name?

Thanks for your help,
Scott

Offline Steve Helmick

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 9956
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #22 on: May 03, 2011, 08:28:47 PM »
This 80 watt Weller was recommended on either SSW or SH forums.

I got some stainless flatstock (not rolled) from McMaster-Carr that looks like the cat's PJ's, but haven't tried it yet. You need to use Stay-Brite low temp silver solder, and I couldn't find any around here. Not at the LHS, McLendon's, or Fry's. I did not try Radio Shack, but doubt if they'd carry it. Finally scored some at Tower Hobby. When I get a tank made, I'll let ya know how the "stanley steel" works out. Charlie Martin made his F1C tanks out of stainless shimstock of some sort, and used Stay-Brite. Looked very neat. 

The Stay-Brite flux is highly corrosive, so I may use a substitute. I'm also pondering a neutralizer that would be more stout than baking soda. Maybe lye? Other ideas would be very welcome, no lye! (pun intended).  :-\ Steve 
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

Offline Chris Wilson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1710
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #23 on: May 03, 2011, 08:48:53 PM »
....... techniques?


Thanks,
Scott

Try this link and note well the type of flux recommended.

http://controlline.org.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=7787
MAAA AUS 73427

You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.
 Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result.  It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required

Offline Mark Scarborough

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 5918
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #24 on: May 03, 2011, 11:11:11 PM »
What's the life expectancy of a carbon fuel tank? Or a balsa one/
Most likely until it starts leaking Randy,,
For years the rat race had me going around in circles, Now I do it for fun!
EXILED IN PULLMAN WA
AMA 842137

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12829
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #25 on: May 04, 2011, 01:20:11 AM »
This 80 watt Weller was recommended on either SSW or SH forums.

I got some stainless flatstock (not rolled) from McMaster-Carr that looks like the cat's PJ's, but haven't tried it yet. You need to use Stay-Brite low temp silver solder, and I couldn't find any around here. Not at the LHS, McLendon's, or Fry's. I did not try Radio Shack, but doubt if they'd carry it. Finally scored some at Tower Hobby. When I get a tank made, I'll let ya know how the "stanley steel" works out. Charlie Martin made his F1C tanks out of stainless shimstock of some sort, and used Stay-Brite. Looked very neat. 

The Stay-Brite flux is highly corrosive, so I may use a substitute. I'm also pondering a neutralizer that would be more stout than baking soda. Maybe lye? Other ideas would be very welcome, no lye! (pun intended).  :-\ Steve 
That looks like a good choice of iron.

One of the keys to soldering stainless is the flux.  Paradoxically, stainless doesn't rust because it doesn't want to oxidize.  No, stainless doesn't rust because it does oxidize, and the chromium oxide forms a hard, impervious barrier.  You need a flux that can punch through that, and you often need to use special methods (i.e. scrubbing the metal with a wire brush while the solder or flux is molten on the surface) to get it tinned.

Until you become an expert (which I'm not -- I've soldered lots of materials, but not stainless) your best bet is to follow the package instructions religiously, and test your work as you go along.

I'll keep using my Dole(tm) tinplate, 'cause it's cheap and way easy to solder.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Jim Kraft

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3412
  • AMA78415
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #26 on: May 04, 2011, 07:02:05 AM »
I use the .022 silver bearing solder from Radio Shack. It is rosin core, and I think 2% silver. I use it for everything including tanks, and it makes beautiful joints that seem to be plenty strong. I used it on the cabane struts on my 78" biplane 25 years ago, and they are still good.
Jim Kraft

Offline Randy Ryan

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1767
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #27 on: May 04, 2011, 10:40:51 AM »
I'm surprised no one's mentioned Plumber's Paste. I use it for all my soldering, it works well on music wire too. I use a 300 watt Weller gun with great results, I also have several irons. I started using Plumber's Paste for several reasons. 1) its soluble with lacquer thinner (so is resin from cored solders) making it very easy to flush the tank. 2) Its not as corrosive as some other fluxes, but perfectly acceptable in a well cleaned joint. 3) Its readily available at hardware stores, Lowe's Home Depot etc. But the main reason I use it is for heat transfer improvement, since it can be easily cleaned up with lacquer thinner it can be used liberally (I hate that word) so that heat transfer is greatly improved even with light duty soldering equipment. I used a 140 watt Weller for a long time until I got the 300 watt at an auction. I don't even have any other fluxes in the shop anymore, I was really happy when I got to throw our the Tinner's fluid.
Randy Ryan <><
AMA 8500
SAM 36 BO all my own M's

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13772
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #28 on: May 04, 2011, 12:59:44 PM »
   I have made *a lot* of tanks over the recent years. As most people have mentioned, soldering is usually the downfall. The materials are not nearly as important as the technique. Even regular old 40-60 electronics solder is plenty durable enough, and unless you are using old rusty tin cans, rosin core is fine and you don't need any sort of harsh flux. Some of the milder plumbing flux can help in tough cases with some surface corrosion or loss of tin plating. I would personally make new clean parts than struggle with acid flux but it does work.

   Having the biggest, baddest soldering gun you can get certainly helps, and there is no reason to use anything like a heavy wand iron, in fact, that will probably make it harder to do. You want the hottest tip you can get but you don't need or want a lot of capacity behind it because you want only local heating. But I have seen excellent jobs done by guys with 25-watt pencil irons. You don't want to use a torch directly (although Floyd's butane-heated iron indirectly heats and works fine). A standard propane torch will evaporate the tin from the surface in seconds.

     The most important thing of all is to make sure that every bit of solder flows, and is hot enough to flow like water at some point. 40/60 will get a vaguely blue surface tone when it is hot enough and fully liquified. Done correctly it only takes a tiny amount of solder, and you can work it around over a pretty remarkable distance if it's hot enough and the seams are tight. By far the biggest problem is the tendency to glob on solder barely at the melting point without having it wet both side of the joint. There should be negligible thickness to it and only small fillets at 90 degree joints (like where the tubes go in). I have seen some instances where tubes had what looked like a volcano, I kid you not, a 3/4" diameter cone built up around the base of it, that despite using about an ounce of solder, still leaked. Solder has to flow *like water*, if it will stand on its own in a clump, it's not hot enough.

    The converse also happens - if you get it too hot, like with a torch, you will evaporate all the tin and then you will get beads of solder. Same thing will happen if the surface is not clean, or not compatible. If that happens, then you are essentially compelled to use an acid flux. Start with the mild stuff and if that doesn't work, then work you way up . The flux that comes with the little Sta-Brite kits is about the strongest you can get and it will easily solder to stainless steel and chrome, but it will also corrode anything it touches severely. I have done some repair jobs where I ate away half the tip of my 350 watt Weller gun in about 10 minutes with Sta-Brite flux. But it did clean it up to get good flow. As near as I can tell, you can't really entirely remove it so its its just a matter of time before whatever it is corrodes. I usually prefer to make a new tank part than use Sta-Brite flux.

 After soldering the only other really key is cleaning it out.  Most of the design features are just another argument waiting to happen but it's also not that important.

      I will be making some tanks soon so maybe I will document the process.


    Brett

    

Offline Rafael Gonzalez

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 348
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #29 on: May 06, 2011, 05:47:16 AM »
Most metals have a very high boiling point. The butane/propane torch will not generate those high temperatures needed to boil the metal. The rosin/acid provides a surface clean of oxidization in order for the metals to make a clean bonding contact with each other. If the rosin/acid is burned, the material generates oxides on the surface and it will separate the solder into bubbles due to the metal seeking its most stable form.
The soldering iron should have sufficient mass to sustain the heat needed at the local area to be soldered. The high mass prevents the quick dissipation of its heat onto the surface, thus lowering the temperature at the tip with the solder becoming solid. One of the hints that the mass is not sufficient, is when the solder melts. It instantly hardens on the surface and your iron is stuck!  HB~> Another, is when it takes a long time to melt the solder on the material. This due to the mass of the tip not being enough or the iron too low on watts.
By having an adequate iron with good mass and power, we heat the local area quick enough to melt the solder and not transfer the heat to the whole unit (tank).
I was involved in manufacturing long, long ago with wave soldering, ball grid arrays, etc. for a long time... D>K H^^

Offline Howard Rush

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7818
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #30 on: May 09, 2011, 08:34:22 PM »
I couldn't find my Stay-Brite flux recently, so I used Nokorode Tinner's Fluid, which worked a treat.  Nokorode Tinner's Fluid may be extinct, but the label says it's HCl and zinc chloride. 
The Jive Combat Team
Making combat and stunt great again

Offline Rafael Gonzalez

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 348
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #31 on: May 23, 2011, 06:05:09 PM »
I couldn't find my Stay-Brite flux recently, so I used Nokorode Tinner's Fluid, which worked a treat.  Nokorode Tinner's Fluid may be extinct, but the label says it's HCl and zinc chloride. 

HOLY COW!!! That is the common muriatic acid!!! Make sure that the tank or whatever you solder is neutralized with baking soda!!! %^

Offline BrianW517

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 80
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #32 on: May 23, 2011, 09:54:16 PM »
I thought they'd get soggy after awhile.  They do if you use the wrong resin.  Dave Fitzgerald had many flights on his, which convinced me to try it.  It's the bees' knees if your plane is nose-heavy.
  :o  n~ In both WWI & WWII and early on in the Korean War, there were Paper & Wood Disposable Gas Tanks for fighter planes and some of the smaller light bombers. y1   H^^

Offline FLOYD CARTER

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4462
    • owner
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #33 on: May 25, 2011, 02:29:30 PM »
One final thought.  Never use brass!  I once made a tank from brass shim stock because I didn't have any tin plate.  It repeatedly cracked at the corners!

Floyd
90 years, but still going (mostly)
AMA #796  SAM #188  LSF #020

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13772
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #34 on: May 25, 2011, 03:16:23 PM »
One final thought.  Never use brass!  I once made a tank from brass shim stock because I didn't have any tin plate.  It repeatedly cracked at the corners!

  My dad made all of his tanks from shim stock. They all cracked eventually. I have made a few 1/2A tanks with it and they stayed together but I sure wouldn't count on it.

   I also made one from aluminum (welded with the eutectic welding rod they were selling at the 96 NATs) but that was *in no way* worth the effort.

   Brett

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12829
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #35 on: May 25, 2011, 04:00:00 PM »
I also made one from aluminum (welded with the eutectic welding rod they were selling at the 96 NATs) but that was *in no way* worth the effort.

Not even to say it was cool?

I used to do sales for my dad's street rod parts company (when I wasn't in the back, covered in fiberglass doing production work or building molds).  For a while there was this huge fad for cars with parts that were Hand Machined out of Solid Billet Aluminum.  It was sorta kinda cool when the high-end builders were doing unique one-off parts for unique one-off cars, but then things evolved (or devolved) into a situation where you couldn't sell an accessory unless it was Milled from Solid Billet (the 'by hand' kinda got lost) -- as if your average rear view mirror frame must be machined from billet, instead of cast or something.

Now we're on to 'simple' that's so exaggerated that if your car doesn't have rust on it then you're not cool.

At any rate -- our hobby missed that bullet, with the possible exception of Jett engines.  Thankfully.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Online Lauri Malila

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1638
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #36 on: May 27, 2011, 04:29:44 AM »

   I also made one from aluminum (welded with the eutectic welding rod they were selling at the 96 NATs) but that was *in no way* worth the effort.

   Brett
[/quote]

 Brett,

 What was the main problem? I've thought about trying to make an aluminium tank, just for curiosity. I have great experience of brazing with Castolin Eutectic #190 and see no reason why it would not work.

 Lauri

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13772
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #37 on: May 27, 2011, 07:44:40 PM »
What was the main problem? I've thought about trying to make an aluminium tank, just for curiosity. I have great experience of brazing with Castolin Eutectic #190 and see no reason why it would not work.

      It took a lot of heat, and the ability to braze the maybe .012 aluminum with an 1/8 rod made it very difficult to get reliable welds without burning through. The end result was no lighter than my .007 tin tanks.

    Brett

Online Lauri Malila

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1638
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #38 on: May 28, 2011, 01:27:15 AM »


 Aha, I understand. But that's only a tool problem. The castolin stuff that I have is about 1/16" dia. And it's quite malleable so perhaps I can pull it even thinner.
 The biggest problem with aluminium is to keep the temperature up and even. Also, the melting temperature of aluminium is not far from the melting point of the braze. Aluminium shows very little warning signs before melting (no glow), for this reason you must use correct flux that indicates the correct temperature. But yeah, I believe you that it's not easy.
 Another possibility is to assemble the tank together with solder & flux and then put the whole thing into oven. And to wait what happens. I've done it with simple thin-walled parts. L

Offline Rob Killick

  • 2013 Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 388
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #39 on: May 28, 2011, 10:03:37 AM »
Hi ,

What about using a TIG welding set up ?

I know , it's not very likely modelers would throw away a few grand to weld tanks together , but where I work , a welder I know , sometimes practises , welding aluminum soda cans back together .

It makes me think that you should be able to construct fuel tanks with this welding set up ?

Just a thought ,

Rob K.
Rob Killick , MAAC 33300

Offline FLOYD CARTER

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4462
    • owner
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #40 on: May 28, 2011, 01:39:05 PM »
My butane-powered portable soldering gun is made by W.L. LENK.  I bought it to take to the Tucson VSC after trouble the previous year at Tucson.  In the spark ignition event, two flyers had broken wiring in their planes ()I was one of them).  We jury-rigged back into operation, but a portable soldering iron would have been ideal.

Floyd
90 years, but still going (mostly)
AMA #796  SAM #188  LSF #020

Offline Paul Smith

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 5815
Re: tank fabrication?
« Reply #41 on: May 28, 2011, 04:00:55 PM »

Some folks like the soldering "guns" that Weller makes.  They're OK, but I think they get too hot and then cool down too fast when you hit them with solder.  I have a really massive soldering iron that I call 'Bertha' -- I inherited it from my uncle, and I think it dates to the 1940's.  Because of the mass, it doesn't change temperature much when you put solder on, which makes the whole soldering experience pleasant.  The last time I soldered a tank I used a propane torch -- I think I could get to like it, but Bertha is better.  Serious old-time sheet metal workers used something called a soldering "shoe", which is a honking big chunk of copper on a stick, heated in a little propane or electric furnace.  It works like a soldering iron, except it doesn't heat itself.  Since the tinplate that we use for tanks is so thin, I suspect that a little 40 watt electronics soldering iron would work, but I haven't tried it.


My dad had one of those old pre-electic soldering irons.  I used to heat it up by holding in the fire box of our gas water heater.  It worked OK, but my mother was more than a little uneasy about the operation.  So for my birthday in 1955 my father gave me a Weller soldering gun.  I'm still using that gun today.  Weller's current product is virtually unchanged.

 
Paul Smith


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here