News:



  • May 24, 2024, 02:35:14 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Speaking of Carbon matt... Filler  (Read 1264 times)

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3415
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Speaking of Carbon matt... Filler
« on: February 03, 2009, 11:52:10 AM »
Has anyone else noticed that corn starch works much better for filling a carbon covered surface than that zinc stuff.. My box of corn starch went away during an ordeal involving our dog and a skunk so my last two finishes were done with zinc stearate because that's what I had..

Really didn't think much about it, just thought it was something I was doing but I fought pin holes like never before and it just seemed like it took a million coats to fill. Actually on both ships (if you look close) you can see where it really didn't fill even after 5 or 6 coats of filler and associated sanding.

Approaching the finishing stages of the new ship started me thinking, I sure don't remember having any big problems with plain old Brodak butrate clear and corn starch.. Going to renew my corn starch supply and see if my memory is correct.

I am starting to think the zinc stuff is fine for spraying on to help fill silkspan but corn starch has it hands down over carbon..

Alan Hahn

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Speaking of Carbon matt... Filler
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2009, 02:27:49 PM »
I thought that the pin hole issue went away if you got the "correct" Carbon matt. My first batch of Carbon fiber matt was a disaster and I had to completely remove it---still haven't finished that plane.

Ever the optimist, some years later I ordered the stuff from ACP which was suppose to have the "right stuff" (binder I think). Supposing that is correct, is the pinhole issue still a problem? I am such a slow builder (especially finisher) that I am loath to "curse"  :X another plane if pinholes are a big issue.

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3415
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Re: Speaking of Carbon matt... Filler
« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2009, 02:55:54 PM »
All the matt I've purchased came from Aerospace. Have heard about the sizing issue but doubt it had anything to do with my problems as the airplanes I finished before used the same carbon.

Alan Hahn

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Speaking of Carbon matt... Filler
« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2009, 03:06:55 PM »
All the matt I've purchased came from Aerospace. Have heard about the sizing issue but doubt it had anything to do with my problems as the airplanes I finished before used the same carbon.

Bob,
So maybe I missed the original point----these pinholes you have now are a new issue --something presumably to do with a new finishing technique?

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3415
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Re: Speaking of Carbon matt... Filler
« Reply #4 on: February 03, 2009, 03:15:03 PM »
Bob,
So maybe I missed the original point----these pinholes you have now are a new issue --something presumably to do with a new finishing technique?

Only difference was using zinc stearate rather than my usual corn starch (mixed in clear dope for a filler).. Just wondering if anyone else has noted how much better corn starch seemed to work over carbon.

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22781
Re: Speaking of Carbon matt... Filler
« Reply #5 on: February 03, 2009, 06:47:48 PM »
Hi Bob, old DOC here,  I tried the corn starch and dope thing on a plane, it did not come out for me.  Maybe not enough corn starch in the dope.  I went back to the old Talcum Powder and dope for filler.  Have never tried the Zinc Stearate so can't say anything about it.  Right now waiting on the dope/talc on new plane to set up so I can sand it.  It is silkspan over SLC covering, silkspan put down with water base poly clear.  Did use the Scotch Brite pad on the SLC first this time. 

I have used carbon veil in the past and as Rusty Brown told me don't wipe the dust off after sanding.  Just put on more clear dope and let carbon dust be the filler.  It worked back then, but, I don't like carbon fiber.  Just me,  DOC Holliday
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3415
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Re: Speaking of Carbon matt... Filler
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2009, 08:49:26 AM »
That cinches it for me... Put first coat of corn starch filler on the flaps this morning and just sanded one down.. One coat and it's almost ready to paint, did find two pin holes but thats nothing compaired to the hundreds I had to deal with using the zinc stuff. I sure don't understand.. Read many posts of guys using Nitrate dope and zinc stearate without issues and even swearing it works (fills) better than butyrate.. I sure haven't found that to be the case. My worst finishing nightmare was trying nitrate dope and now I'm completely convinced Corn Starch is the best thing going.

Doc, the only reason I moved away from talc was weight, corn starch is a little lighter and I feel it sands much easier. I don't really have a recipe, just start adding corn starch till it looks right.

Offline phil c

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2480
Re: Speaking of Carbon matt... Filler
« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2009, 09:54:10 AM »
The zinc stearate particles are shaped like little flat discs.  They "fill" by laying flat in the paint film as the dope dries.  They bridge over holes and gaps in the fibers on the surface(silkspan or balsa).  It can save a some of weight, since less actual material ends up on the plane.  The pinholes come when the gaps in the surface are too large and the dope soaks through the stearate layer into the wood, leaving gaps in the dope layer.

Cornstarch particles are spheres.  They penetrate the porous surface more and actually fill in the pores of the surface.  This leaves more solid material on the plane, so the final finish tends to weigh more.
phil Cartier

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3415
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Re: Speaking of Carbon matt... Filler
« Reply #8 on: February 04, 2009, 10:33:22 AM »
Thanks Phil, I was not aware of the details. Good to know tidbit..

Kinda confirms my conclusion that zinc stearate works very well over silkspan but not worth a hoot over carbon. Carbon matt is pretty coarse and does take more filler than silkspan. I don't feel the weight difference is an issue. Might be if you were covering every square inch including the wings but just the fuselage and flaps might cost a quarter ounce if that.

Might be interesting to see what a mixture of the two would do..

Offline Pinecone

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 235
Re: Speaking of Carbon matt... Filler
« Reply #9 on: February 06, 2009, 08:05:28 AM »
Sounds like the way to go is first coat with zinc stearate to cover te small holes, then go with corn starch to fill the bigger ones.
Terry Carraway
AMA 47402

Offline phil c

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2480
Re: Speaking of Carbon matt... Filler
« Reply #10 on: February 08, 2009, 02:29:02 PM »
If you are using carbon fiber for stiffness, take Al Rabe's advice and use thinned epoxy finishing resin to glue the carbon down first.  Carbon and epoxy is much stiffer than carbon and dope.  Dried dope is just not a very strong or stiff plastic, while epoxy is about 3X as strong as stiff.  The carbon can only do its work if it is held solidly in place.
phil Cartier


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here