Author Topic: thoughts on Cox engines (Read 1411 times)

Wayne Collier · « **on:** February 28, 2007, 03:50:49 AM »

It seems to me that Cox hit a triple crown victory with the bee series of engines. Affordable. Available. Dependable. Other things that didn't hurt were durability, and interchangeability.

PaulGibeault · « **Reply #1 on:** March 05, 2007, 02:59:39 PM »

HI Wayne,

Absolutely true, which is why Cox engine production out numbered all other types made COMBINED!

Bill Little · « **Reply #2 on:** March 07, 2007, 08:32:05 AM »

Quote from: Wayne Collier on February 28, 2007, 03:50:49 AM

It seems to me that Cox hit a triple crown victory with the bee series of engines. Affordable. Available. Dependable. Other things that didn't hurt were durability, and interchangeability.

I had sorta *hoped* that someone wold pick up production of the Cox engines, for all the reasons you mention, Wayne. The Chinese company that bought the tooling seems in no way inclined to do so. I wonder *why* they bought it!

LARRY RICE · « **Reply #3 on:** March 09, 2007, 06:12:55 AM »

I understand that they did produce some and sent them to Brodak, they were crap. They must be using the same junk tools that they are flooding our markets with (Harbor fright).
Larry

Author Topic: thoughts on Cox engines (Read 1411 times)

Wayne Collier

thoughts on Cox engines

PaulGibeault

Re: thoughts on Cox engines

Bill Little

Re: thoughts on Cox engines

LARRY RICE

Re: thoughts on Cox engines