News:



  • June 19, 2025, 08:09:11 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Tod lee's engine?  (Read 4063 times)

Offline Claudio Chacon

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
Tod lee's engine?
« on: August 09, 2024, 09:47:59 AM »
Hello guys!
What engine is Todd Lee using in his current Nats plane?

Thanks...
Claudio.

Online Dan McEntee

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7493
Re: Tod lee's engine?
« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2024, 10:12:35 AM »
  Ro-Jett 67 on a rear exhaust muffler is what I've been told.

  Type at you later,
   Dan McEntee
AMA 28784
EAA  1038824
AMA 480405 (American Motorcyclist Association)

Offline Claudio Chacon

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
Re: Tod lee's engine?
« Reply #2 on: August 09, 2024, 10:16:08 AM »
Thanks Dan!

Online Dave_Trible

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6708
Re: Tod lee's engine?
« Reply #3 on: August 09, 2024, 11:00:36 AM »
And a Dave Trible prop……(who dat?)

Dave
AMA 20934
FAA Certificate FA3ATY4T94
 Investing in a Gaza resort if the billionaire doesn't take all my social security check

Offline Claudio Chacon

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
Re: Tod lee's engine?
« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2024, 11:57:08 AM »
 ;)

Offline Walter Hicks

  • 2018 Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 396
Re: Tod lee's engine?
« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2024, 02:54:57 PM »
Congrats Todd on a job well done. Dave, What muffler was Todd using on the 67 and what size, pitch prop and what fuel? I am using the RO Jett 67 and love it.

Online Dave_Trible

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6708
Re: Tod lee's engine?
« Reply #6 on: August 09, 2024, 03:39:22 PM »
Hello Walter.   The prop is 12.25 x 6.4 nominally three blade carbon.   Todd has tweaked it to his liking but that's what comes out of the mold.   Today he was using 12 1/2% Nitro fuel.   Not sure the rest but experience tells me it was 22-23 % oil.  The muffler is a custom carbon fiber one.  He has told me the name of the guy who made it but ..........The run is/was flawless.   The .67 is superb as is the .61 and .76.  The .67 might be the best choice for running on a muffler but they will all do that.   IC lives on- three out of the top five.

Dave
AMA 20934
FAA Certificate FA3ATY4T94
 Investing in a Gaza resort if the billionaire doesn't take all my social security check

Offline Claudio Chacon

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
Re: Tod lee's engine?
« Reply #7 on: August 09, 2024, 04:36:41 PM »
Thanks guys for all the info.
Much appreciated.

Offline Walter Hicks

  • 2018 Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 396
Re: Tod lee's engine?
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2024, 01:49:16 PM »
Thank you Dave for the information.

Offline Brent Williams

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1345
    • Fancher Handles - Presented by Brent Williams
Re: Tod lee's engine?
« Reply #9 on: August 10, 2024, 05:22:28 PM »
What's the realistic weight upper range for this flavor of Stalker Ro-Jett 67 engine?
« Last Edit: August 10, 2024, 05:59:16 PM by Brent Williams »
Laser-cut, "Ted Fancher Precision-Pro" Hard Point Handle Kits are available again.  PM for info.
https://stunthanger.com/smf/brent-williams'-fancher-handles-and-cl-parts/ted-fancher's-precision-pro-handle-kit-by-brent-williams-information/

Online Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 14474
Re: Tod lee's engine?
« Reply #10 on: August 10, 2024, 05:25:13 PM »
What's the realistic weight upper range for this flavor of Stalker 67 engine?


     It *is not* a Stalker, it is a RO-Jett 67 LS.

      Brett

Offline Brent Williams

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1345
    • Fancher Handles - Presented by Brent Williams
Re: Tod lee's engine?
« Reply #11 on: August 10, 2024, 05:58:32 PM »

     It *is not* a Stalker, it is a RO-Jett 67 LS.

      Brett

Thank you.  I typed Stalker...I meant to type Ro-Jett!  LOL :-[
Mental constipation moment!
Laser-cut, "Ted Fancher Precision-Pro" Hard Point Handle Kits are available again.  PM for info.
https://stunthanger.com/smf/brent-williams'-fancher-handles-and-cl-parts/ted-fancher's-precision-pro-handle-kit-by-brent-williams-information/

Online Dave_Trible

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6708
Re: Tod lee's engine?
« Reply #12 on: August 10, 2024, 07:04:39 PM »
What's the realistic weight upper range for this flavor of Stalker Ro-Jett 67 engine?
  I've had the .61s pretty effectively pull a 75 ounce airplane but realistically I'd try to keep the weight for the .67 under 70 ounces.  An ideal weight for something 670-690 sq. inches and the .67 (IMHO) would be 66-68 ounces.

Dave
AMA 20934
FAA Certificate FA3ATY4T94
 Investing in a Gaza resort if the billionaire doesn't take all my social security check

Online Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 14474
Re: Tod lee's engine?
« Reply #13 on: August 10, 2024, 07:39:59 PM »
Hello Walter.   The prop is 12.25 x 6.4 nominally three blade carbon.   Todd has tweaked it to his liking but that's what comes out of the mold.   Today he was using 12 1/2% Nitro fuel.   Not sure the rest but experience tells me it was 22-23 % oil.  The muffler is a custom carbon fiber one.  He has told me the name of the guy who made it but ..........The run is/was flawless.   The .67 is superb as is the .61 and .76.  The .67 might be the best choice for running on a muffler but they will all do that.   IC lives on- three out of the top five.

Dave


The 61 runs just fine on a muffler, Ted ran it that way for a while on the first Trivial Pursuit using a header muffler and something like a 12.5-5 3- blade. Running the lower revs reduced the performance as expected, but this case did not take any advantage of the weight difference that you could use if you built it for this from the start. The “mistake” version I like was made, apparently  when trying to make it turn a bigger prop with more 4-2 action, the mistake actually making it run faster, reduce the break, with a smaller prop- which is exactly what I would want and why I like it better.

If I was planning on doing like Todd, the 67 is a much better starting point than the 61.

Brett

p. s. As a comparison of the rev difference Todd ran 6+ inches of pitch and I am running 3.75

Offline M Spencer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 5238
Re: Tod lee's engine?
« Reply #14 on: August 11, 2024, 11:03:42 PM »
" I'd try to keep the weight for the .67 under 70 ounces.  "

Id try to keep the weight of ANYTHING under 70 ounces .

Tags: