News:



  • June 13, 2025, 03:44:33 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Something interesting WW1 naval history DAZZLE  (Read 496 times)

Offline GERALD WIMMER

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 658
    • Auckland Free Flight Club
Something interesting WW1 naval history DAZZLE
« on: April 06, 2020, 04:03:31 PM »
Hello here's an interesting article on Jalopy Journal that you may find interesting, in the comments they relate also to the formation aircraft paint schemes of the 8th Airforce.
https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/wwi-dazzle.1189648/


Regards Gerald

Offline John Miller

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1728
Re: Something interesting WW1 naval history DAZZLE
« Reply #1 on: April 06, 2020, 06:28:38 PM »
Hi Gerald. Similar camo schemes were used on US Navy ships before WW2, and early on in the Atlantic Ocean. It was called "Splinter".

John Miller
Getting a line on life. AMA 1601

Offline Tony Drago

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 710
Re: Something interesting WW1 naval history DAZZLE
« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2020, 07:02:19 PM »
They used a couple of P-51s (A-36)with that camo paint scheme. The idea was dropped do to cost and  the time it took to paint them.

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4052
Re: Something interesting WW1 naval history DAZZLE
« Reply #3 on: April 06, 2020, 10:05:34 PM »
Gee, just think how you coul confuse a stunt judge with a scheme like that. Maybe not such a a great plan?  >:D
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 14458
Re: Something interesting WW1 naval history DAZZLE
« Reply #4 on: April 06, 2020, 10:50:40 PM »
During WW2, on most, but not all ships.  It affected rangefinders as well and many ships appeared farther away than they actually were. Radar made this a waste of time, except to submarines using periscopes. By late 1944,  it was no longer applied. D>K

   Also, the only real threat by that point was kamikaze planes, and it didn't help with that, either.

      The concept is still sound, and "busy" paint jobs on the fuselage can have an influence on how well you can see it and how it looks to the judges. It's possible to take some small advantage of that to emphasize or cover up some of the characteristics. Also, on a small scale, to hide paint defects.

     Brett

Offline FLOYD CARTER

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4503
    • owner
Re: Something interesting WW1 naval history DAZZLE
« Reply #5 on: April 07, 2020, 11:10:23 AM »
 It's possible to take some small advantage of that to emphasize or cover up some of the characteristics. Also, on a small scale, to hide paint defects.

But on all my planes, I don't see defects until AFTER all the painting is done.  By then, it's too late to worry.  But I might try a "dazzle" paint scheme knowing that  my planes will have defects.
91 years, but still going
AMA #796  SAM #188  LSF #020

Tags: