News:



  • July 01, 2025, 04:33:54 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?  (Read 3652 times)

Offline RC Storick

  • Forum owner
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12566
  • The finish starts with the first piece of wood cut
    • Stunt Hangar
Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« on: January 09, 2008, 07:11:41 AM »
I got a email stating this and lets hear your thoughts?

Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
AMA 12366

Offline Jim Oliver

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1414
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2008, 07:30:14 AM »
Saprky,

Not absolutely sure what the "legal" definition of Special Interest Group is.  If a SIG is supposed to represent the interests of a specific group (let's say control line stunt flyers) to another specific group (say the AMA), then that job is already taken.

Given the percieved favor shown by the AMA to the RC flyers (of all types), there may be a need for a Special Interest Group for Control Line scale, combat, speed, etc.  Such a SIG may already exist, but since I don't fly any of those types, I don't know.

I would suggest a conversation with your AMA District VP about the question.

Cheers,
Jim 
Jim Oliver
AMA 18475

Offline RC Storick

  • Forum owner
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12566
  • The finish starts with the first piece of wood cut
    • Stunt Hangar
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2008, 07:48:18 AM »
Who said there can only be 1 SIG for each facit? Chevy vrs Ford
AMA 12366

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3414
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2008, 08:47:13 AM »
Don't know about the SIG thing but sure wished you would take the weather links out of the forum software. This forum is so slow to load when you click on a thread I don't even bother unless it is something I really want to read.

Citywx.com is dead in the water and the links are slowing down progress..

Offline Jim Oliver

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1414
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2008, 09:24:38 AM »
Per the AMA web site, the SIGs for control line are:

North American Speed Society
Navy Carrier Society
National Control Line Racing Association
National Association of Scale Aeromodlers
Precision Aerobatics Model Pilots Association

I didn't see a SIG listed for CL combat, but there may be one.

Jim
Jim Oliver
AMA 18475

Offline Ron King

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 353
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2008, 09:49:13 AM »
I didn't see a SIG listed for CL combat, but there may be one.


MACA used to be the combat SIG, but I heard they had some internal squabbles.

As far as Stunt Hanger being a SIG: Please define what we want to represent. As far as On Line Forums go, all control line forums are very small potatoes compared to the RC forums. As far as control line stunt goes, PAMPA is the SIG and I don't want to get into that argument again.

I suggest we leave well enough alone and enjoy our little niche. Control line model aviation is a wonderful hobby, but it will never be as big a part of the overall scene as in the past.

My .02,

Ron

PS - I agree with Bob Reeves. Whatever is causing the super slowness, get rid of it. Stunt Hanger is virtually unusable right now. I used to scan things every day. Now I don't bother. The threads take forever to load.

Ron King
AMA AVP District 4
Wannabe Stunt Pilot since 1963
 Amateurs practice until they get it right; Pros practice until they cannot get it wrong.

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10476
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2008, 10:12:59 AM »
On forum speed: I don't have any problem, but then, I'm on a T-1 connection.
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3414
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2008, 10:44:27 AM »
If we can't get Sparky to fix it.. everyone go into your profile and delete your zip code.. Without the zip the weather thing won't try to load..

Offline john e. holliday

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22982
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2008, 11:12:12 AM »
No problems here with the speed of looking at posts or plictures since my daughters boy friend corrected the so called dial up thingy in the main pc.  Before that I could only post from the lap top.  Go figure,  DOC Holliday
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Bill Little

  • 2017
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12668
  • Second in COMMAND
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2008, 11:35:02 AM »
I don't know what to say.  I have not experienced any problems with loading on a normal basis.  I am on cable, maybe that is a difference?  I also had to replace my ethernet card and went with a 10/100 which was a higher rated one than before.
Big Bear <><

Aberdeen, NC

James Hylton Motorsports/NASCAR/ARCA

AMA 95351 (got one of my old numbers back! ;D )

Trying to get by

Offline RandySmith

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 13756
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
    • Aero Products
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #10 on: January 09, 2008, 11:38:19 AM »
If we can't get Sparky to fix it.. everyone go into your profile and delete your zip code.. Without the zip the weather thing won't try to load..

HI Bob

I have had  zero problems  loading up or down here, I am not sure what teh problem on some peoples end a re  but I have asked several people and they have had no problems either. If the weather link is slowing things down we may need to take a look at it but, it is strange that it would only slow a few people and  not others???

Reagrds
Randy

Offline wmiii

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 187
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #11 on: January 09, 2008, 01:08:56 PM »
 I've had no problems on this end, no apparent slowing.

 Walter
walter menges

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3414
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #12 on: January 09, 2008, 01:37:16 PM »
Don't believe it has anything to do with connection speed as I am on a wireless service that is faster than cable or DSL and this is the only site giving me trouble. Probably a timeout setting when the browser isn't able to access a URL.

You guys have fun, someone send me a note when it's fixed... Bye

Offline Trostle

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3392
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #13 on: January 09, 2008, 07:39:36 PM »
The AMA recognizes organizations that represent some form of aeromodeling.  The AMA lists as many as 24 Special Interest Groups.  The AMA has forms that can be submitted to the AMA if a group wishes to receive SIG status with the AMA.  I am not sure if the AMA has a definition for what a SIG really is.  Furthermore, I am not sure what the purpose of a CL Forum SIG would be.  And I think there would be some problems with filling out the SIG application in the name of a CL Forum.

As has been mentioned, there are SIG's for Aerobatics, Carrier, Speed and Racing.  There is a SIG for Scale, the National Association of Scale Modelers which encompasses RC, FF and CL.

To clarify some statements above, the Miniature Aricraft Combat Association, MACA, for CL Combat, is alive and well.

Check out:     http://www.maca.hobby-site.com:3535/

The National Free Flight Society is the SIG recognized by the AMA for all of the FF events, including indoor.  In fact, I think the NFFS is probably the first so-called SIG recognized by the AMA years before there were any CL SIG's.  I think the nature of the FF events allows those events to be represented by a single SIG and it seems to work well as far as the AMA and the Free Flighters are concerned.

I cannot speak for the other SIG's, CL or otherwise, but the purpose of the SIG status of PAMPA is to assist the AMA in the conduct of the Nats and the FAI CL Aerobatics Team Trials.  However, the roll of PAMPA in these events might seem a bit unclear to the casual observer.  The CLPA events at the Nats are run by the Nats CLPA Event Director under the direction of the Nats organizers and the Director of the Nats CL events.  Announcement about the Nats stunt events are made in the PAMPA newsletter as are calls for volunteers.  For the most part, the volunteers at the Nats, including judges, tabulators, pull testers, pit bosses, and on and on are for the most part, but not always PAMPA members.  I think the AMA depends on the other CL Sig's for the same functions at the Nats.  For the FAI Aerobatics Team Trials, these are planned and determined by the AMA FAI Control Line Aerobatics Team Selection Committee which has nothing to do with PAMPA.  However, the Team Selection Finals Event Director depends heavily on volunteers, mostly from PAMPA, to make the Team Trials work.

Offline Ray

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 99
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #14 on: January 09, 2008, 08:55:32 PM »
Don't believe it has anything to do with connection speed as I am on a wireless service that is faster than cable or DSL and this is the only site giving me trouble. Probably a timeout setting when the browser isn't able to access a URL.

You guys have fun, someone send me a note when it's fixed... Bye

I use an ordinary cable internet connection, not particularly superfast at all.  But FireFox is so much better than any MS Internet Exploder version that it's not funny.  I have never used IE for anything other than getting the Security Patches for the leaky OSes MS sells.  There has been no slowdown here that I've seen.  None at all.  Give either Sea Monkey or FireFox a try and see if the slowdown disappears. 

Offline gary tultz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 152
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #15 on: January 10, 2008, 09:09:30 AM »
YES, Mozilla Firefox is the best by far y1 y1 y1 H^^        Rainman   aka   Gary T.

Offline jamtx

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 32
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #16 on: January 10, 2008, 10:23:11 AM »
 Mine is very slow also, can't read alot of the post. I got dail up, shouldn't be that slow.
James Karnes
Abilene,TX.

Offline George

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1468
  • Love people, Use things.
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #17 on: January 10, 2008, 03:01:27 PM »
Back to the SIG thing...

IMHO, control line SIG=yes, AMA SIG=no. As stated several times, for AMA purposes, just as in "Highlander"...there can be only one!   ;D 

But we are, of course, a group with a special interest ... thus a SIG.

George



George Bain
AMA 23454

Offline RC Storick

  • Forum owner
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12566
  • The finish starts with the first piece of wood cut
    • Stunt Hangar
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #18 on: January 10, 2008, 07:49:51 PM »
I am taking weather off, and when that does not fix the problem? what next? Its usally on your end. I have no problems on this end. could be your router or something else. However I am remover the weather insigna's.
AMA 12366

Offline Mike Foley

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #19 on: January 10, 2008, 09:21:26 PM »
  I'm on ten Meg per second cable. Sometimes the site is fine other times  pages are either slow or just wont load. Can be very frustrating. At least I'm not alone

Offline Keith Spriggs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 760
    • khspriggs
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #20 on: January 10, 2008, 11:18:41 PM »
YES, Mozilla Firefox is the best by far         Rainman   aka   Gary T.

After reading your glowing reports I gave it a try. So far I am very pleased. One thing that I cant find is a way to send a shortcut to the desktop. Any ideas? PM if you like.

Offline Dick Fowler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 487
Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #21 on: January 11, 2008, 06:30:42 AM »
YES, Mozilla Firefox is the best by far y1 y1 y1 H^^        Rainman   aka   Gary T.


... and what's your opinion of K-Mart?
« Last Edit: January 13, 2008, 07:53:24 PM by Dick Fowler »
Dick Fowler AMA 144077
Kent, OH
Akron Circle Burners Inc. (Note!)
North Coast Control Liners Size 12 shoe  XXL Supporter

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3414
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Re: Is Stunt Hangar a New SIG?
« Reply #22 on: January 11, 2008, 08:28:38 AM »
I am taking weather off, and when that does not fix the problem? what next? Its usally on your end. I have no problems on this end. could be your router or something else. However I am remover the weather insigna's.


It will fix the problem.. try going to www.citywx.com and you will receive a 404 error because the site is gone. It is not a problem on my end other than I am still running an older version of IE on a couple computers. I have 4 computers all with both FireFox and IE that I use fairly regularly. The two that are still running Windows 98 really show the problem, the other two aren't too bad but still slow compaired to what it was before citywx went away.

When you get the citywx links off the site the problem will go away...

Tags: