You really did well!
Beware in Flying the TD4 that if you should input sharp down controls, the wingtips flex down and you are guaranteed a crash. I don’t think Cox ever made another plane from Poyethelyne. Polypropylene didn’t work out either. The best mix was high impact poly styrene and 10% Krayton rubber. Canopy’s were originally crystal styrene, but we found a pretty tough, clear material that was only faintly milky. Sorry, don’t recall the plastic’s name.
Props had to be virgin 6-6 Nylon, no regrind allowed. The gray props added 10% chopped glass fiber. Current props I have seen aren’t as flexible and tough. Sad, the cost isn’t that much more to do it right. I suspect current props are left over from when Barry Tunick of ESTES took over. Simple product engines sold as Killer Bees and other hideous violation of old quality standards.
Gears for the cars were similar material but with Molybdenum Di Sulfide for lubrication. Really a tough material.
We were big enough to blend whatever we wanted to do the job, and the engineers and quality guys were topnotch. Plus, and a really big one, management wanted the BEST possible products. I don’t recall ever hearing that something was too expensive to do.
What a fantastic place to work! Mind you, MATTEL preliminary design was just as good in its own way. I have really had a fantastically satisfying career!

(Once I escaped from the aerospace rat race {don’t ask, I don’t want to remember those wasted years})

BTW when I worked at ESTES in the late 60’s it was still a great place to do innovative projects and see them through from concept to production line. Who ever gets to do that anymore? Concept, model, plans, instructions, material sourcing, and production setup, ALL MINE!
