I tried to do that with previous cyber-stalkers, and it only works some of the time. It's like our other problem child (in more ways than you think), you can try to ignore him but it's not that easy.
Brett
I taught young children for 35 years. I definitely know what you mean by that reference. This is not what's happening here.
I think your inability to accept a difference of opinion (from me) causes your mislabeling and misunderstanding of what I'm doing. As in the past I outlined some of the ways Fox 35s are effectively set up by club members. You went on the offensive with a demeaning rude tone. No reason to be surprised by what you got back. I am not trolling. My initial post flatly stated information. Your response had a different tone. I responded in kind. Not a problem for me. Recreational. Sharp dialogue. Creative. Actually. I wouldn't be surprised if our back and forth is recreational and creative for you. We've been at it a while.
So friend. Ease up a bit on what I say. I'll do the same. Or choose not to. Also. Believe me when I say I'm referring to practices used by folks you would agree know something about what they do.
I love your remark about sentence structure. My sentence fragments. Mike Palko once described my style on these forums as run on sentence, run on sentence, run on sentence, followed by a fragmented sentence. Mike is very smart and accurate here. Also very funny.
Poets and some prose writers of fiction as well as some playwrights, use punctuation differently than writers of expository composition. Formal writing uses punctuation to accurately notate sentence structure. Creative writing often operates differently. Punctuation can be used to shape rhythmic phrasing. Punctuation can be used to help Indicate the flow of a thought or the curve of an emotion.
Obviously I do not do formal writing on these forums. I can labor through writing effective business documents. Here I have fun.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk