planned parenthood...all Started by Hillary Clinton's HERO Margaret Sanger a Racist and the cause of the Death of millions
Randy
Margaret Sanger wrote (in 1932):
Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.
Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…
Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.
So much for the "right to choose". Fortunately, a wide array of people including Christian Conservative saw this attempt for exactly what it was, and defeated the attempt to add this classic eugenics clause to US code.
emphasis added
In case it was unclear what constitutes "unfit":
1932:
Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.
and
Dec. 10. 1939,
We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.
Note that she also went to war against the Catholic church for defending people's "right to choose" on both religious and secular moral grounds, eventually suggesting that the Catholic people will almost certainly be found to be "genetically deficient" and therefore subject to breeding restrictions.
It is utterly unambigious that the entire point to this effort was to reduce breeding of the unfit/unworthy, particularly along lines of race. And it is also utterly unambiguous that this has had their "desired effect" as a result of wildly disproportionate abortion of black babies as opposed to other races. Operating for decades (instead of about 10 years like the Nazis). I fail to see a consequential distinction.
I don't think most liberals actually believe in this effort, they are not indecent people as a rule, and I am not pointing the finger at individuals. But, it's also hallmark of leftist thought to avoid facts that are inconvenient or they don't want to face (like the demonstrable fact that NO left-wing policies have EVER been seen to be beneficial or to "work" for the good of humanity - far from that, all have been unmitigated disasters). Only if you ignore the inconvenient results can you continue to "beleive", or come up with excuses (like, "socialism/communism will work, they just didn't do it right...")
Note this starts the countdown to someone running off to "daddy" to get the thread locked...
Brett