News:



  • May 01, 2024, 12:50:13 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Heinkel 219  (Read 8748 times)

Willis Swindell

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Heinkel 219
« on: November 12, 2009, 02:13:43 PM »
4 stroke seams a little slow lately. I had a little fun Sunday. I took my Saito 30’s out of my Heinkel 219 and installed  two Saito 40’s. What a difference, first flight on 64 ft. lines about dragged me across the circle. Half ounce tail weight and 70 ft. lines now this is fun. I need to take the 2 1/2 oz. tanks off and install 3 or 3 1/2 oz. tanks, cuts off in the first overhead eight but keeps on flying with one engine.
Willis
« Last Edit: November 12, 2009, 08:02:39 PM by Willis Swindell »

Offline proparc

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2391
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2009, 11:56:17 PM »
Two Saito 40's  :o

Man, that is a lot of power. Willis, you are seriously channeling some "Tim Allen".
Milton "Proparc" Graham

Offline Martin Quartim

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 802
    • StuntHobby
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2009, 02:44:30 PM »

Hi Willis,

This thing flying gotta be very impressive!

Love to see that flying on youtube

Martin
Old Enya's never die, they just run stronger!

https://www.youtube.com/user/martinSOLO

Willis Swindell

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2009, 03:24:35 PM »
Martin I E-Mailed you a short flight. Hope you don’t mind
Willis
OK Milton what do you think?
« Last Edit: November 13, 2009, 06:21:56 PM by Willis Swindell »

Offline proparc

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2391
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2009, 04:59:55 PM »
Martin I E-Mailed you a short flight. Hope you don’t mind
Willis

How bout me. :-[
Milton "Proparc" Graham

Offline Stan Bidowski

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 66
    • Winnipeg Perfect Circle Flying Club
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2009, 08:48:03 AM »
Looks great!  Did you draw your own plans for this model?  How's it fly?
Can you give some specs- wing area, weight, span, length, tail size, bellcrank
size, etc?  Did you use double control horns on the flaps ( looks like swept
TE on wing )?  More pics please!!
NICE!
Stan Bidowski   :)
MAAC 17167

Willis Swindell

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2009, 09:32:24 AM »
Stan
From memory, Time Machine 60 wing 660 square with a strait leading edge twin push rods both flaps and V elevators, Tom Morris controls. with the Saito 30’s 64 oz. a few more now. I blew up a side view of the heinkel to the size I wanted then stretched it to the length that I wanted. I got carried away with the rudders They are way to big but this is SEMI scale. The fuselage is covered with 1/64 plywood and does not twist at all.
Willis
« Last Edit: March 12, 2010, 08:51:43 PM by Willis Swindell »

Offline Martin Quartim

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 802
    • StuntHobby
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2009, 07:44:49 PM »
Martin I E-Mailed you a short flight. Hope you don’t mind
Willis
OK Milton what do you think?

Hi Willis  thank you for sending the video, I appreciarted the sound of 2 4Stroke! You model looks great flying.


Martin
Old Enya's never die, they just run stronger!

https://www.youtube.com/user/martinSOLO

Offline proparc

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2391
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #8 on: November 15, 2009, 02:25:54 PM »
Willis, received the video.
Willis, do you play the blues-because brother, your groove is outstanding!! Either you, your plane, or your engine combo is laying down a seriously good track. Your plane is definitely in the pocket-a winner.
Milton "Proparc" Graham

Offline Steve Fitton

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2272
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #9 on: November 23, 2009, 08:40:20 AM »
That He-219 has always been a great flying plane for Willis! I think you'd see him compete with it more but for the fact that the twin rudders easily get knocked off-usually as you get the plane out of the car at the contest!
Steve

Willis Swindell

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #10 on: November 23, 2009, 11:20:00 AM »
Funny the only time the rudder didn’t break off is when it flipped over on the grass and broke the stab.
Willis

Offline Air Ministry .

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 4995
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #11 on: November 29, 2009, 10:31:18 PM »
Dont you blokes realize stunt models are designed to teach people to be carefull going through doorways !

Drop of undercarrage would stop any flipping , if you fly of grass .

Nice aeroplane.A twinshould be compulsary for all aeromuddlers .

Online wwwarbird

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7982
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #12 on: December 01, 2009, 05:44:14 PM »
 Great stuff Willis!

 Could I ask you to measure up and give us an accurate spec on the wing and stab spans and areas? I'd really like to compare your Heinkel to my PBY. I've been debating making the exact engine swap you've done here, Saito .30's to .40's.

 Thanks!
Narrowly averting disaster since 1964! 

Wayne Willey
Albert Lea, MN U.S.A. IC C/L Aircraft Modeler, Ex AMA member

Willis Swindell

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #13 on: December 02, 2009, 02:59:56 PM »
WWWarbird
The Heinkel has a 58 inch wing span 13 inch plus 10 inch cord. 667 sq. in. wing and the stab is 27 inches 6 inch plus 5 1/2 inch cord. 155 sq. in. stab. 16 1/2 inches hinge to hinge. and seven 1/2 inches from wing L.E. to back of prop I had to add 1/2 oz. weight to the rear for the 40’s.

Online wwwarbird

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7982
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #14 on: December 05, 2009, 04:27:59 PM »
 Thanks Willis. I've currently got 1.8oz machined stainless spinner nuts plus another 1oz of lead in the nose compartment on the PBY. I can afford the extra weight of the .40's and then likely take away some of the dead weight. You've got me thinkin'!  ;D
Narrowly averting disaster since 1964! 

Wayne Willey
Albert Lea, MN U.S.A. IC C/L Aircraft Modeler, Ex AMA member

Online wwwarbird

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7982
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #15 on: March 05, 2010, 12:11:22 AM »
 Willis,

 My swap to .40's is complete, can't wait 'til spring! #^
Narrowly averting disaster since 1964! 

Wayne Willey
Albert Lea, MN U.S.A. IC C/L Aircraft Modeler, Ex AMA member

Offline Glenn (Gravitywell) Reach

  • Gravitywell
  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #16 on: March 05, 2010, 10:54:12 AM »
Neat plane.  I particularly like the last pic of her, she looks like she's rounding out on final.  Very nice. H^^
Glenn Reach
Westlock, Alberta
gravitywell2011 @ gmail . com

Willis Swindell

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #17 on: March 07, 2010, 05:52:58 AM »
Wwwarbird we expect a flight report and prop,tank size.
Willis  H^^

Online wwwarbird

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7982
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #18 on: March 09, 2010, 09:05:10 PM »
 Willis,

 I've got 3-1/2 ounce wedge tanks on it, that's the biggest "off the shelf" ones that will fit. If I end up needing bigger ones I'd have to make them, yuk.

 I'm going to have to start all over with the prop selection process, but I'm hoping that the Master Airscrew three blade 10x7's or 10x5's I have will work out. I've got some black Tornado three blade 10x6's I can try too. I know you can't tell how many blades there are when they're spinning, but it just doesn't look right with anything but three bladers on it.

 It will be a while yet but I'll post a report at some point this spring.

 'Til then,  H^^
Narrowly averting disaster since 1964! 

Wayne Willey
Albert Lea, MN U.S.A. IC C/L Aircraft Modeler, Ex AMA member

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3415
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #19 on: March 10, 2010, 03:14:07 PM »
What Bob would do...

Stick on a Thunder Tiger 11.3 X 6.5, adjust your choke or throttle for 8200-8300 RPM. Remove the Thunder tiger and without changing anything put on one of the 3 blade 10-x props. Run the engine and note the RPM.. If it's higher increase the pitch of the prop till it loads the engine down to the same number you had with the TT. If it's lower decrease the pitch till it's the same. Fly it and see what you got, fine tune the prop pitch and engine RPM till you are getting the lap times you want withen 8200 to 8400.. Do not go over 8500..

I really have no idea if this will actually work but I do know the Thunder Tiger 11.3 X 6.5 prop works and it seems like a reasonable approach to get in the ball park pretty quick. Of course this is assuming you have some way of adjusting the intake choke area which I believe is a necessity.

Online wwwarbird

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7982
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #20 on: March 10, 2010, 06:07:52 PM »
 Thanks for the advice once again Bob, sounds like a reasonable plan. But what Wayne might do though is try the same basic process, but starting with the new black Evo props since I can get them readily at the LHS. Maybe like a 10x6 or 7. Another thing is that I've only got room for a 10" prop, maybe 10.5" at the absolute max. I'm really curious about the Evo props because I had great improvement with them right at the end of last season but I ran out of weather. Right away though I got a feeling they might be a great prop for a lot of applications, I'm also anxious to try them on some .35-.40 single engine stuff too. They also ran real smooth and quiet. Anyway, I'm just hoping that in the end one of the three bladers will work out for the PBY, we'll see.

 BTW Bob, I think you mentioned it before, but where is the best place to get the TT props from. I'd never even heard of them until you mentioned them.
Narrowly averting disaster since 1964! 

Wayne Willey
Albert Lea, MN U.S.A. IC C/L Aircraft Modeler, Ex AMA member

Willis Swindell

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #21 on: March 11, 2010, 08:04:31 AM »

I am now using A zinger 11x5 with a 1/4 inch cut off the tips but planing to try a Master Airscrew 11x7 three blade cut 1/4 inch off the tips for clearance to load the engine a little more. This prop is really a 11x5. I bought a Evo 11 inch 3 blade prop a few years ago and it had a 3 1/2 pitch.

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3415
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #22 on: March 11, 2010, 10:02:36 AM »
I found the Evo props to be not that great but might be OK if they were repitched. The TT props can be ordered direct from TT  see the "Props for Saito 40" thread below..

http://stunthanger.com/smf/index.php?topic=13100.0

When I tried an Evo 11-7 on one of my 40's I had to run the RPM up past the point I was comfortable with to get the lap times back up. This told me it wasn't really a 7 pitch, would guess something less than a 6. At the time I was looking for a stock prop I could recommend to replace the Rev-Up 11-7. The TT needed a little RPM increase over the Rev-Up (100 RPM) but was better than the Rev-Up overhead so now all my 40's are running TT 11.3 X 6.5's. Bolt it on and go fly, not bad for a $2.00 prop if you buy them 6 at a time. This prop should be your standard from which to judge anything else you try. If you have to put 3 inch wheels on for a few flights, so what at least you will have a good reference in which to work from.

Online wwwarbird

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7982
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #23 on: March 11, 2010, 10:35:14 PM »
 Thanks for the added input Willis, good stuff to know. (Sorry to pirate your thread BTW)


 Bob,

 Three inch wheels won't do me any good, it's the prop to fuse clearance that's the issue. When I designed it I wanted to keep the engines as close together as possible and didn't think I'd ever need bigger than 10" props, because I was going to be running .30's.
Narrowly averting disaster since 1964! 

Wayne Willey
Albert Lea, MN U.S.A. IC C/L Aircraft Modeler, Ex AMA member

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3415
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #24 on: March 12, 2010, 03:15:45 AM »
Bob,

 Three inch wheels won't do me any good, it's the prop to fuse clearance that's the issue. When I designed it I wanted to keep the engines as close together as possible and didn't think I'd ever need bigger than 10" props, because I was going to be running .30's.

Ya that would make it a bit difficult, hope you come up with something that works. Keep us informed..

Online wwwarbird

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7982
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #25 on: March 12, 2010, 08:21:53 AM »
 Will do.
Narrowly averting disaster since 1964! 

Wayne Willey
Albert Lea, MN U.S.A. IC C/L Aircraft Modeler, Ex AMA member

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22774
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #26 on: March 21, 2010, 03:21:48 PM »
Go to three blades. H^^
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Air Ministry .

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 4995
Re: Heinkel 219
« Reply #27 on: March 30, 2010, 12:55:28 AM »
A few full size pre war racing planes with timber props had one prop in front of the other,
to give 4 blades. Looked to be dead on 90 deg. perpendicular just like a 'normal' 4 blade aeroplane prop.


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here