With quick thinking, I think the main effect is increasing the suction, not by making flow faster in narrowest point, but creating turbulence friction before it. A bit like adding an air filter. I think those vanes in Enya's venturi are far too close to the mouth of venturi to work as advertised. The airflow right after prop is quite chaotic.
But in general, I think a longer venturi shroud is a good thing, it makes the suction less affected by the direction of cooling airflow.
Also in rear intake, it keeps engine compartment cleaner and accepts a more restrictive airfilter.
In (racing)classes with venturi size rules, it's good to have a plenum chamber before the point of fuel atomization, and the narrowest point well before it. For this reason the rules also usually state a maximum volume for the space between narrowest point and crankshaft/intake valve. But of course, it also depends on wether a pressure tank or venturi suction is used.
I use rear intake and with my plug-in venturi's the distance from mouth to fuel posts is restricted to about 1/2" by exhaust header. For this reason I make an extension from silicone tubing, it makes the engine run clearly more constant, even without a filter mesh.
Lauri