Interesting you should ask about oil content. This is a subject I have been mulling over for some time. There is lots of info on the internet and a lot of that is "that's what we have also done so that is what we will do" type of thing.
If you are comfortable with the engine builders recommendations then you should go that way; they know their engines. That is the conservative approach and there isn't anyting wrong with that.
However, I have gotten to the point where I like to challenge common convention and push the limits in one direction or another. If you have any interest in model diesels and haven't seen this thread on RcUniverse, you might find it interesting in experiences using very low % ether or NO ether model diesel fuel with minor diversions into the question of lubrication.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_4561055/mpage_1/key_/tm.htmIn my search for knowledge I have been running several engines on various mixes (emperical testing) and a lot of reading on whateve I can find on these subjects.
Recently I ran across an old (2001) control line newsletter called Linecheck. This was a shortlived newsletter published in the UK and more or less concentrated on control line racing. Issue #10 Jan 2001 has a particularily interesting bit by Andy sweetland who writes on metal tanks and oil in fuel. Now the requirements of a team race engine and one we use for stunt or sport flying are quite different. However, engines are engines.
Here is a link to that newsletter:
http://www.noclassmac.com/Downloads/download_index.html issue #10 January 2001 Andy sweetland writes on metal tanks and oil in fuel.
Have a read, good a read. A little hint, one fellows University thesis was based on model size engines. To summarize his results, he found that higher %'s of oil caused the engines to run hotter than lower %'s. His test where done in the mid 70's using an engine with a steel cylinder / cast iron piston (BUGL team race engine).
There you go, something to think about.
cheers, Graham in Embrun near Ottawa Canada