What I don't get with the above explanation is that the tank has 18 laps left in it after the last maneuver ........... 18!
So if it is a standard tank it must be truly massive for all of that to be true, and if the fuel is being thrown around enough then perhaps a smaller tank is in order?
The issue is that the fuel us getting pulled down to the bottom and front of the tank as a result of the acceleration of maneuvering. It doesn't go to the equilibrium fuel surface because it's the acceleration changes too quickly but it goes in the expected direction. Tilting or tapering the tank makes it hang around the rear of the tank longer. Increasing the wedge angle makes it hang around the peak of the wedge longer.
I have experimented with this pretty carefully. I built some tanks for the PA61 that just had dimensions that came out even, including the wedge angle. They had the same issue described here. Not quite quitting but going lean in both inside loops and then running a fair number of laps after. Reducing the fuel load to eliminate the excess laps led to it quitting. I made two more tanks with the wedge sharper by one click of "grid" on my CAD program, and then I could run much closer to the end without any anomalies. One more click of "grid" on the next tank, with a more acute angle, could run to within a few laps. My current tanks can be run with as little as 2-3 laps after the pattern and they do not change AT ALL in the overhead or 4-leaf.
This is all actually very critical in FAI - you don't want the engine running funny in the 4-leaf but you can't afford to run excess fuel just to mitigate it because of the possibility of running over the 7-minute time limit, particularly at low lap speeds.
Note that in some cases you have have worse issues in the overhead than the 4-leaf since the outward acceleration is lower.
I would also point out that the trim and overall fuel load of the airplane makes a big difference. Nose-out yaw trim makes the fuel want to run to the front of the tank more than it would otherwise. Lots of fuel means lots of CG shift, particularly on light airplanes, and that makes the yaw angle more nose-in as the flight goes on. There are a lot of variations on this theme but that's why a good tilt or a lot of wedge obviates having to consider the fuel load based on the trim.
Brett