News:



  • May 28, 2024, 05:46:06 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Crankcase pressure  (Read 1255 times)

Offline Andrew Tinsley

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1345
Crankcase pressure
« on: May 11, 2013, 07:29:40 AM »
I have been following the theme about muffler pressure for stunt. My query is what about crankcase pressure for some of the more potent 1/2A engines? I have been experimenting with an MP Jet engine which goes like a bomb when you find the correct diameter of crankcase nipple. It all seems a bit hit and miss to me. So is there any rule of thumb for this type of pressure feed?
I took me a little while to figure out why there is an average positive pressure in the crankcase, but I still feel a one way valve would be an advantage. I know this isn't normal stunt application, but those people that have it mastered, do some very impressive stunt schedules!

Andrew.
BMFA Number 64862

Offline Jim Thomerson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2087
Re: Crankcase pressure
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2013, 10:59:54 AM »
I have used crankcase pressure pretty constantly with TD 049, 09 and 15.  I used a one way valve.  I tried it without the one way valve and got an occasional inconsistent result.  I tried crankcase pressure on a Fox 35 and destroyed the piston and liner with lean runs.  I could not set it rich enough on the ground to stop it going really lean in the air.  S?P

Offline Andrew Tinsley

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1345
Re: Crankcase pressure
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2013, 11:16:08 AM »
Thanks Jim,
 had a suspicion that a one way valve would be a good bet. Are there any valves that you could recommend. The ones I have are a bit on the large side for 1/2A. I wonder if the hit and miss results I got are due to the fact that I omitted the one way valve. I tried the scientific approach and started with a very small aperture and just kept on increasing the diameter. The results were very inconsistent and I couldn't really tell what was happening!

Thanks Andrew.

P.S. The AM25 is doing sterling work and is now powering grandson's first "big" (!) stunt job.
BMFA Number 64862

Offline rustler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 719
Re: Crankcase pressure
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2013, 01:17:56 PM »

 had a suspicion that a one way valve would be a good bet. Are there any valves that you could recommend.

I guess a shaft timed pressure take-off is a one way valve?
Ian Russell.
[I can remember the schedule o.k., the problem is remembering what was the last manoeuvre I just flew!].

Offline BillLee

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1297
Re: Crankcase pressure
« Reply #4 on: May 11, 2013, 04:33:14 PM »
Back in 1978, I wrote in my CL Racing column in Model Aviation:

A good question to ask here is, "How much does
this pressure change affect the total pressure in at
pressure system?" In order to find an answer to this,
you have to know the pressure that is created in the
tank by using crankcase pressure. I set up
a test stand to measure this and found that the tank
pressure from an untimed crankcase tap is about 1.4
psi, or about 1.6 psi if a ball-check is used in the
pressure line.


The entire column can be seen at http://www.nclra.org/TechTopics/UniflowPhysics.pdf
« Last Edit: May 12, 2013, 02:15:42 AM by BillLee »
Bill Lee
AMA 20018

Offline Jim Thomerson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2087
Re: Crankcase pressure
« Reply #5 on: May 11, 2013, 04:44:24 PM »
I have small, well guarded,  stash of KK one way valves.  KK made a pressure backplate for the TD 049 which had a built in one way valve.  I think someone told me Jett engineering made a small diameter one way valve. I'd also look at Texas Timers website to see if they have anything.

Offline Steve Helmick

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 9950
Re: Crankcase pressure
« Reply #6 on: May 11, 2013, 10:32:10 PM »
I believe these are what Paul and Howard used on the B-17 "909", very possibly modified.  H^^ Steve 


http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXG850&P=7
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

Online Howard Rush

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7816
Re: Crankcase pressure
« Reply #7 on: May 13, 2013, 12:07:43 AM »
Those are nice one-way valves.  We used them (actually just the shell with new innards) for an entirely different purpose.

Crankcase pressure allows a bigger intake, but doesn't work very well for stunt runs on the rich side of peak RPM with engines that have a negative slope of crankcase pressure with RPM.  The richer they get, the richer they get until they quit.
The Jive Combat Team
Making combat and stunt great again

Offline L0U CRANE

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1076
Re: Crankcase pressure
« Reply #8 on: May 18, 2013, 02:06:52 AM »
To: Rustler -

Timed shaft pressure is quite a bit higher than 'averaged' case pressure, as it is only pumping when the piston is on the way down. The shaft intake port hole closes before the piston starts to rise significantly. A check-valve also prevents cyclical pressure drop in the case from affecting fuel delivery.

Years back, I made a few, flawed, attempts to measure the pressure from muffler, averaged-case and shaft-timed pressure operation. Scatter of observations with cheap Pep Boys type pressure guages negated anything conclusive.

The trend was there, however:-

Lowest: muffler pressure

middle-ground: averaged case pressure

highest: timed (shaft port) pressure.

Otherwise, only inflated bladder pressure tanks  - as in glow combat - exceed any of the above as a fuel delivery pressure source.
\BEST\LOU

Offline rustler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 719
Re: Crankcase pressure
« Reply #9 on: May 18, 2013, 02:26:20 PM »
Hi Lou. Trust you are well. Missed you at VSC this year, - yes we got there!
I'd be interested to know results for "average c/case pressure with a one-way valve in the pressure line". I guess it should be similar to shaft timed?
I have somewhere a couple of n.i.b. (but rusty!) American tanks (K&B from memory?) apparently with one-way valves in them somewhere. Any advice or comments on these? I'm reluctant to use them, the're headed for da bay I think.
Ian Russell.
[I can remember the schedule o.k., the problem is remembering what was the last manoeuvre I just flew!].

Offline Brian Hampton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
Re: Crankcase pressure
« Reply #10 on: May 18, 2013, 07:44:54 PM »
Sometime way back in the 70's I did an experiment on an ST G20/15 to find out what untimed pressure was and from memory it was 1.5psi. The pressure guage was a simple water manometer where 1psi = 27.75". Although I've never checked it, I believe muffler pressure is around .1psi and a simple way to test it is to lower a length of fuel tube into a glass of water until it stops bubbling. Timed crankcase pressure is around 6psi so you'd need quite a tall manometer to measure that (or use mercury instead of water).

Offline BillLee

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1297
Re: Crankcase pressure
« Reply #11 on: May 18, 2013, 08:49:12 PM »
See reply #4
Bill Lee
AMA 20018


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here