News:



  • April 30, 2024, 08:30:42 PM

Login with username, password and session length

« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: f-18  (Read 1002 times)

Offline roger

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 405
f-18
« on: August 03, 2009, 03:04:29 PM »
any body know of a real nice f-18 profile jet for c/l and maybe for a 35 to 40 motor pic. too  ???
Logged

Offline roger

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 405
Re: f-18
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2009, 04:38:53 PM »
ok what a bout a f-15? LL~
Logged

Offline Clancy Arnold

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1453
  • I am 5 Ft. 8 In., the Taube is 7 Ft. 4 In.
Re: f-18
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2009, 06:12:08 PM »
I have a CL model of a F/A-18 with a 54 inch WS.  Has two OS 46 DF engines in it.  Will that work?  By the way at 54 inch WS it is 80 inches nose to tail.  The advantage it would have in Navy Carrier is that it not only has big flaps but also leading edge droop capability.  Think of an undercambered wing for slow flight.

Clancy
Logged
Clancy Arnold
Indianapolis, IN   AMA 12560 LM-S
U/Tronics Control
U/Control with electronics added.

Offline roger

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 405
Re: f-18
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2009, 06:49:03 PM »
OK CLANCY PUT UP OR SHUT UP LETS SEE THIS BABY!!!!!! IM GOING NUTS
Logged

Offline skyshark58

  • skyshark58
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 401
Re: f-18
« Reply #4 on: August 03, 2009, 10:57:19 PM »
AMA limits the wing span of a profile navy carrier event airplane to 50 inches, not less than 300 sq. in, and not more than 4 pounds weight.   Mike
Logged
mike potter

Offline roger

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 405
Re: f-18
« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2009, 06:55:58 AM »
mike
the f-18  hornet would qualify if built in the right perportions and what about tom cats? y1
Logged

Offline skyshark58

  • skyshark58
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 401
Re: f-18
« Reply #6 on: August 04, 2009, 07:49:10 AM »
Good luck!
Logged
mike potter

Offline Clancy Arnold

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1453
  • I am 5 Ft. 8 In., the Taube is 7 Ft. 4 In.
Re: f-18
« Reply #7 on: August 05, 2009, 10:31:47 AM »
Roger
I have posted these before, but just for you, here they are.  The big guy is Jack Sheeks.

The first picture is of the model disassembled for transport.
Second picture is fueling the tanks for test taxi prior to first test flight.
Third picture is during taxi test on left engine only.  Had problems of getting the fuel line into the fans.  Fuel tanks are ahead of the engines in the removeable nose.
Fourth picture is of Jack and I with the F/A-18A.  Big model that weighs 11 lbs.
Controlled with U/Tronics 4 channel system for throttle, flaps and leading edge droop(2 channels required).
Clancy
« Last Edit: August 05, 2009, 10:49:15 AM by Clancy Arnold »
Logged
Clancy Arnold
Indianapolis, IN   AMA 12560 LM-S
U/Tronics Control
U/Control with electronics added.

Offline don Burke

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1027
Re: f-18
« Reply #8 on: August 05, 2009, 04:45:56 PM »
Really a neat project.  Must be a real pull on the lines!
Logged
don Burke AMA 843
Menifee, CA

Offline Steven Kientz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
Re: f-18
« Reply #9 on: August 06, 2009, 02:59:11 PM »
I saw Clancy's plane hanging in his garage. Would definitely take a grown man and several small children to fly it. of course you could fly it on a speed pylon.

Steve
Logged
Steve Kientz
AMA 855912

Advertise Here
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 


Advertise Here