News:



  • May 17, 2024, 12:05:16 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: HMAS Seaford - Australia  (Read 747 times)

Offline Paul Stein

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 38
HMAS Seaford - Australia
« on: March 08, 2011, 04:27:13 AM »
Chaps,

A report, results and pictures of our Navy Carrier competition are to be found at:

http://clamf.aerosports.net.au/  "Latest News"

Enjoy !

Paul

Offline Bob Heywood

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 999
Re: HMAS Seaford - Australia
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2011, 05:37:01 AM »
"This is gonna hurt..."

The trap shown on the web site header looks much cooler.

Great stuff.

Thanks.
"Clockwise Forever..."

Joe Just

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: HMAS Seaford - Australia
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2011, 08:40:56 AM »
Great pictures on the site!  Interesting...only 4 arresting lines on their fantastic deck.  This group should really be contacted about the Postal Carrier Contest. Anyone out there with their address? Anyone in OZ can email me or PM me for PCC info.
Joe

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22777
Re: HMAS Seaford - Australia
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2011, 09:03:36 AM »
Go to the link in the post and click on about the CLAMF.   I have the site in my favorites so I can keep tabs on a certain Matthew Spencer.   Have plans he sent of his Folkerts I would like to get built.  H^^

By the way I like their carrier deck as it is more like a real carrier with only 4 lines to snag. 
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline john vlna

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1353
Re: HMAS Seaford - Australia
« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2011, 10:56:35 AM »
Interesting landing technique

Offline Paul Stein

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 38
Re: HMAS Seaford - Australia
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2011, 04:44:10 PM »
Aussie Navy Carrier forbids the use of sliders so I guess this places the event in the US Nostalgia category. As such 'hanging' is a rarity so the models need to handle the low speed with aplomb. Our rules also have a bias towards the low speed and landing instead of the high speed run.

The Brodak Guardian was upgraded with a larger tail surface which improved the handling. It was originally built with a sightly longer nose moment as we came to grips with a balance point that suited our flying style. With all the mods and lead in the nose it weights in at 47 ozs.. a bit heavy but great for windy days !!

Comparo of original tail surface and enlarged version in pictures

Paul

« Last Edit: March 12, 2011, 04:19:14 AM by Paul Stein »

Offline mike hartung

  • aeronut
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Re: HMAS Seaford - Australia
« Reply #6 on: March 10, 2011, 08:58:28 AM »
Great pictures, thanks for the post.
blue skys and tail winds to all.

Offline skyshark58

  • skyshark58
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 401
Re: HMAS Seaford - Australia
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2011, 04:52:48 PM »
Their deck is narrower too (5 feet I think) but the same total length,44 feet. Smaller size means lighter panels and easier to load y1.I like it!
mike potter

Offline Thomas Wilk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 296
    • Tom Wilk's old mag plans on CD
Re: HMAS Seaford - Australia
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2011, 07:58:47 AM »
I have a video of Carrier UK but at 436MB my ISP can't handle a file that big.

Tom


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here