News:


  • May 28, 2024, 05:44:04 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister  (Read 2498 times)

Offline Peter Hess

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 95
Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« on: October 03, 2009, 02:36:13 PM »
I have two Fancherized Twisters under construction.  (Boy, am I glad to be done cutting the ribs and half ribs.)  Before I get any further on the wings I want to decide what I am going to cover them with.
Since these planes are going to be used as advanced trainers they might not last very long.  That being the case, I don't want to spend the time and money necessary to cover the wings with silkspan or polyester tissue or anything else that requires a dope finish.  In short, I want to use iron-on film.  But, I know that iron-on film does not give a wing as much torsional strength as silkspan and dope, hence my questions.

1. If iron-on film is used - - which I am used to doing - - and is properly applied will the wing be sufficiently stiff for my purposes?
2. If the answer to "1" is no, would adding diagonal partial ribs from the spars to the trailing edge, thus creating something of a Warren truss behind the spars, add enough additional rigidity to be worth the trouble?
3. If the answers to "1" and "2" are both no, would I ruin an otherwise pretty good wing by using 1/20 or 1/16 over the stock structure to create a C or D tube structure, doing which would, of course, add a tenth or an eighth of an inch to the thickness of the airfoil?

Thanks in advance for your thoughts, comments, and suggestions.
Peter Hess
Canton, CT
AMA 485070

Offline Leester

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2530
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2009, 04:12:12 PM »
I've seen Expert, Advanced, Intermediate flyers with Monokoted and Ultracoated planes. I'd say answer to #1 is yes.
Leester
ama 830538

Offline John Jordan

  • Balsadust
  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 71
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2009, 04:43:33 PM »
 If you whant a stronger wing take the center ribs as templets and cut outer ribs down to that size by doing so youcan sheet the whole leading edge and add cap strips d- tube wing and it does not get any bigger than original wing. you can add some 1/16 shear webs out about four bays also. hope this helps you. I just did one like this works great.    Thanks John Jordan
John Jordan    ama # 5939

Offline Mark Scarborough

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 5918
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2009, 04:48:49 PM »
I have built and flown three of four, ( depending on if you count the rebuilds!) Fancherized twisters, they all were Monokoted and all exhibited no adverse affects. I did put in shear webs about halfway out on the wing though FWIW
For years the rat race had me going around in circles, Now I do it for fun!
EXILED IN PULLMAN WA
AMA 842137

Offline mike donovan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 52
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2009, 07:01:31 PM »
I have a fancherized twister that I have been flying for over three years. It has at least one thousand flights on. It has seen three diferent motors and many profile contests. The wing is built stock right from the plans except for the addition of half ribs between the full ribs. the wing is covered with orange monokote and there has never been a problem. The wing is plenty strong for monokote covering. cover it with monokote and enjoy. I think you will like it

Offline Russell Shaffer

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1333
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2009, 07:06:05 PM »
I have broken my fuselage 3 times but the wing is fine.  Stock SIG kit.  The next one will have spruce spars and 1/32 ply on the TE joint but it probably doesn't need it.
Russell Shaffer
Klamath Falls, Oregon
Just North of the California border

Offline Peter Hess

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 95
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2009, 07:05:10 AM »
Lee, John, Mark, Mike, and Russell:

Thank you very much for your responses.  The unanimity of your responses convinces me that iron-on film will be just fine, and so it shall be.  I will probably use Ultracoat as that is what I am most familiar with.

The suggestion that I add sheer webs is great advice.  I don't know why I had not thought about that.

In retrospect I probably should have done as John did and use the center section ribs full span and made it a C-tube structure.  Isn't hindsight wonderful?

These planes were supposed to be ready for this past summer but you all know the way that life can intrude upon one's plans.  Let's see.  It's now only October.  Even I, who builds at a glacial pace, should be able to get them in the air in 2010.

Thanks, again for your help.
Peter Hess
Canton, CT
AMA 485070

Offline Mark Scarborough

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 5918
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2009, 06:33:06 PM »
One of the great things about the wing as designed is that in the event of an unplanned contact with the ground, many times the wing will flex and not break, the monokote will fail between the ribs diagonally allowing the wing to move forward without breaking a bunch of wood like it would if the wing were sheeted on the leading edge. this phenomenan was also noted on my "slow combat" Mongoose , it made MANY nose first contacts and the wing survived many times,, the fuse, not so much,,
For years the rat race had me going around in circles, Now I do it for fun!
EXILED IN PULLMAN WA
AMA 842137

Offline Russell Shaffer

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1333
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2009, 08:12:02 PM »
I think Mark has a very good point.  Stiff objects break and flexible ones flex.  Just don't let the flex get too large. 
Russell Shaffer
Klamath Falls, Oregon
Just North of the California border

Offline Ed Burkot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 34
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #9 on: October 05, 2009, 06:37:05 AM »
How about the finish on the profile fuselage?  I have just started to build my first Twister.  I plan to use Monokote on the wing.  I would like to use the supplied silkspan on the fuselage because of the added strength, but don't really want to go through that process and time.  Is the fuselage strong enough to just paint?  Maybe I should use fiberglass first and color matching spray paint?  What do you recommend?

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22783
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #10 on: October 05, 2009, 09:02:00 AM »
Ed, it really doesn't take that much longer to do the silkspan on the fuselage as it takes less dope for the finish.  DOC Holliday
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Pinecone

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 235
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #11 on: December 27, 2009, 03:56:14 PM »
IIRC the original articles recommended replacing the spars with spruce if using iron on film.  I did so on mine.
Terry Carraway
AMA 47402

Walter Hicks

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #12 on: December 27, 2009, 07:26:38 PM »
Ditto: Spruce Spars and Iron On film. Very good flying plane .

Offline Bob Hills

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • **
  • Posts: 29
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #13 on: December 28, 2009, 08:00:02 AM »
   
   Hi Peter;
           Just started getting my HEAD back in place . We had a BAD time this XMAS! My twister was covered with moneycoat with a stock wing. Why don't you paint the fuselage with rustoleum? I was in a car part store and they have duplicolor pre thinned clear and colors that are lacquerready for spraying.

         Your friend in C/L
          Bob Hills
  P/S I will be at the January club meeting, I will bring the Brodak .40 and some other things to get rid of. SOO much STUFF.
Bob Hills  AMA 15512

Alan Hahn

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #14 on: December 30, 2009, 07:57:24 PM »
From the source: (Model Aviation)
« Last Edit: December 30, 2009, 08:15:58 PM by Alan Hahn »

Offline Jim Thomerson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2087
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #15 on: January 02, 2010, 03:52:58 PM »
It is interesting that the relatively simple and unsophisticated Twister wing structure is perfectly adequate. I think we do a heck of a lot of over engineering; thus adding unneeded weight. 

Offline Dennis Moritz

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2464
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #16 on: January 05, 2010, 09:30:17 AM »
The half ribs are useful since they true up the airfoil. I use balsa spars and web them with light sixteenth. Usually I reinforce the center of the trailing edge top and bottom with 1/32" ply, 2" or so. The last two mods makes for a much stronger wing IMHO. Worth the slight gain in weight. My first Twister survived a full power nose in crash without any damage. It had rained the day before and the earth was pretty soft. Still. The wings were monokoted. The fues silkspan and dope.

Online Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13756
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #17 on: January 06, 2010, 09:38:00 PM »
It is interesting that the relatively simple and unsophisticated Twister wing structure is perfectly adequate. I think we do a heck of a lot of over engineering; thus adding unneeded weight. 

   But it's not anything like stiff enough for the kind of consistency needed to compete. What's OK for sport flying or casual competition may not be for top competitive performance.

      Brett

Offline Bill Heher

  • Fix-it
  • 2020 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 941
  • I may not always BOM- but I do the re-builds!
Re: Wing Covering for Fancherized Twister
« Reply #18 on: January 20, 2010, 12:52:37 AM »
I have one built by someone else- monocote on wings and slikspan / dope on fuse and tail feathers.   I flew the outboard wing on mine through some tree brances in Phoenix and it kept right on trucking, a couple rips in the last bay and tip, but no real damage. I also dorked it pretty good in the grass twice and it survived with minimal damage. It does have the balsa tripler on the inboard side of the nose.

Since you are like me and using it for trainer / learning the pattern I would go with monocote.
Quicker finish = less emotional involvement ( if you don't count all those 1/2 ribs and other tweaks that take time).
Straight, aligned and smooth controls will give you a good flying plane that builds confidence.

I have a second one under construction, Going to be a Twist - Stang- modified fuse / wingtips, tail feathers to look like a P-51B. I just have to get back to Phoenix for work, it is waiting for me under my friends spare bed!
Bill Heher
Central Florida and across the USA!
If it's broke Fix-it
If it ain't broke- let me see it for a minute AMA 264898- since 1988!


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here