Motorman-
As Pat said above, for a "hollow molded wing" for each skin, you need an outer shell layer, an inner core material, and an inner shell layer. The core spreads the two pieces apart, and this is what makes the assembly rigid.
So, you might use 1/2oz glass outermost, then 5.9oz carbon fabric inside of that, then a layer of 1/16" light balsa, then 1.6oz glass on the inside.
All of this would be vacuum bagged to the mold, which is pre-waxed, and usually sprayed with PVA, a release layer.
All this would be cured, then when cured, it would be trimmed.
Then this shell and the mating one would be joined, with a spar usually in the middle. The two molds are made to index and mate to each other. "Splooge" is the glue that bonds the top and bottom shells to one another, as well as the spar (which needs to be EVER SO SLIGHTLY UNDERSIZED, like .005-.0010", preferably). After it is all cured, the molds are taken apart and the molded piece extracted.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This is completely different from making a vacuum bagged foam wing!^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So, for a bagged wing, think of it as using fabric and epoxy in place of balsa as a skin. Normally on a bagged wing, 100% of the foam core stays there between the composite skins. On a sailplane, with a 7-9% thick wing section, it is not a lot of weight, and it adds to the structure.
On a stunt plane, especially since you would want and need to use the 15-40psi foam, this WILL add to the weight with a larger penalty.
It is my theory that someone could CORE the foam AFTER each wing half is vacuum bagged, and remove some excess weight. I think that with a simple spar running the full span of the wing, or maybe 1/2 span, you would have enough strength to fly stunt with, and hopefully it should be light enough.
Remember that you would NOT have to add a finish to the outside most likely, except at the leading edge. So you are going to save a lot of time there and weight on finishing, (I think).
The snag points are for hinging flaps, and a few other details like landing gear and the bellcrank. The last two are probably easily solved already by doing what Bob Hunt has done for foam wings, with maybe some slight mods for the materials being thinner.
A wing with no flaps and fuse mounted landing gear makes the idea of a vacuum bagged wing very attractive to me. I would just need to make some foam cutting templates for stunt wings. And tails.
I hope this helps with the confusion. Hollow molded and "stressed skin, solid core, vacuum bagged wings are two completely different animals, although they both use epoxy and fiber fabrics, and a vacuum bag.
The hollow molded construction has many advantages- The outside surface retains the exact same coordinates no mater how light or heavy you build the inside. Every wing you build form molds SHOULD fly the same. It is likely also lighter. But the process can cost much more, and be more complex.
A vacuum bagged foam core wing starts with a hot wire or CNC cut foam core, and since layers are added to that, the more material you put on it, the dimensions will change slightly.
I don't view this as a big deal, as ANY BALSA SKINNED FOAM CORE WING has the same issues since you sand it, etc., there will be variences anyway. Since the "skin" of a composite vacuum bagged wing is thinner than the balsa skinned wing, I can only assume that the accuracy should be improved....
Kind regards,
Target