News:



  • June 17, 2024, 05:23:43 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Silkspan?  (Read 3396 times)

Offline FLOYD CARTER

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4462
    • owner
Silkspan?
« on: June 16, 2013, 02:06:44 PM »
I did a search on "silkspan" but no one seems to mind that it isn't available anymore.  None of the usual suppliers carry it.

Assuming that silkspan is permanently gone, how about some pointers on SIG LITE-FLITE, or COVERLITE. Is it as strong/water-shrink as silkspan?



Floyd
90 years, but still going (mostly)
AMA #796  SAM #188  LSF #020

Offline Bill Hummel

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 392
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2013, 03:36:23 PM »
I was at Brodak's this week, they have a new source, and have cases of medium and light silkspan in stock.
ama 72090

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13793
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2013, 04:04:15 PM »
I was at Brodak's this week, they have a new source, and have cases of medium and light silkspan in stock.

   It is the original random-fiber stuff, or the weird kind that has lines in it?

    Brett

Online Bob Hunt

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2767
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2013, 04:11:09 PM »
It's my understanding that silkspan's main use is in the making of tea bags and that the original stuff was found to have a carcinogen in it. When it was re-formulated to remove the bad stuff, it also removed the qualities that made it good for our use.

There are darn few materials that come anywhere close to old silkspan for our use. Some have found Polyspan (dress liner material) to work okay, and some like using Japanese Tissue. I just threw in the towel and went exluusively to foam wings... n~

Later - Bob Hunt

Offline FLOYD CARTER

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4462
    • owner
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2013, 04:55:31 PM »
Everyone has light and medium.  I've used only heavy (SGM) because I got tired of fixing holes and tears!  So I've gone through dozens of sheets of SGM and never got cancer.  Not even once!

If heavy doesn't show soon, I might go with medium and double-cover.  More work, but bullet-proof.

(tried polyspan once.  Only ONCE!)

Floyd
90 years, but still going (mostly)
AMA #796  SAM #188  LSF #020

Online Bob Hunt

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2767
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2013, 05:27:44 PM »
Everyone has light and medium.  I've used only heavy (SGM) because I got tired of fixing holes and tears!  So I've gone through dozens of sheets of SGM and never got cancer.  Not even once!

If heavy doesn't show soon, I might go with medium and double-cover.  More work, but bullet-proof.

(tried polyspan once.  Only ONCE!)

Floyd

LOL! ;D I think the cancer concern was when the tea bag came in contact with water and in turn went down the throat of the drinker. Not sure that simply touching it had any ill effects...

Bob Hunt
« Last Edit: June 16, 2013, 06:49:33 PM by Bob Hunt »

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13793
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2013, 06:33:02 PM »
LOL! ;D I think the43 cancer concern was when the tea bag came in contact with water and in turn went down the throat of the drinker. Not sure that simply touching it had any ill effects...

Bob Hunt

 Well, certainly nothing compared to the inhalation of the dope fumes used to attach it!

    Brett

Online Bob Hunt

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2767
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2013, 06:49:58 PM »
Boy, howdy... %^@

Offline FLOYD CARTER

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4462
    • owner
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2013, 12:14:46 AM »
I've made thousands of cups of tea using tea bags.  I've yet to swallow a tea bag  (but, of course, there's always a first time!).  I'll be real careful from now on.

Floyd
90 years, but still going (mostly)
AMA #796  SAM #188  LSF #020

Online Bob Hunt

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2767
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2013, 04:47:53 AM »
What's really cruel is how they got all those lab rats to drink thousands of cups of tea. They kept setting the clocks to 4:00PM every hour of every day. The rats that didn't get cancer drown in their sleep in their, ahem, Tee Pee.  H^^

Bob Hunt

Offline Dave_Trible

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6199
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2013, 04:18:38 PM »
Floyd I've been using Lite-Flite and regular Plyspan.  The Lite-flight to me is jap tissue for all intents but shrinks slightly better.  The Plyspan I would call something between medium and heavy silk span but is really a lot tougher.  It's more dense and fills quickly.  Unlike silk span I've found it better to cover dry,  then water spray then one coat tauntening then finish with non/ taughtening dope to control tension.  I think I'll continue using it for open bays and my stock of light silk span over solid wood where I'm not using carbon.

Dave
AMA 20934
FAA Certificate FA3ATY4T94

Offline Bill Hummel

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 392
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #11 on: June 18, 2013, 05:50:45 AM »
Brett:  Looked and felt like the "old" silkspan, but I'd like to use it before passing judgement...
ama 72090

Mike Griffin

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #12 on: June 18, 2013, 09:24:47 AM »
Dave what is Plyspan.  I Have used Polyspan for years but is Plyspan something different?

Mike

Offline Dave_Trible

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6199
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #13 on: June 18, 2013, 08:30:18 PM »
Dave what is Plyspan.  I Have used Polyspan for years but is Plyspan something different?

Mike
Mike,  I WAS going to tell you there is Sig Plyspan and Sig Lite-Flite Plyspan which I think is what Floyd was talking about.  That's the way the tubes at the hobby shop are labelled anyway.  I just looked on the Sig website and now don't find it.  Maybe another change at Sig?  I'm going to look again at the hobby shop.  Now the website shows about three grades or weights of 'tissue'.   I'm not sure what's what.

Dave
AMA 20934
FAA Certificate FA3ATY4T94

Offline Balsa Butcher

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2357
  • High Desert Flier
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #14 on: June 18, 2013, 10:47:25 PM »
Plyspan has been around for awhile. To me it is like japanese tissue. Some report problems with it becoming brittle and splitting over open bays when given a dope finish. I have found it a little harder to work with because it is not as porus as silkspan. Makes it easier to get a smooth finish but as the dope doesn't penetrate so adhesion problems are can occur. I too have switched to a polyspan type product for open bays. Still use silkspan over solid surfaces and around corners. 8)
Pete Cunha
Sacramento CA.
AMA 57499

Mike Griffin

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #15 on: June 19, 2013, 09:44:09 AM »
Mike,  I WAS going to tell you there is Sig Plyspan and Sig Lite-Flite Plyspan which I think is what Floyd was talking about.  That's the way the tubes at the hobby shop are labelled anyway.  I just looked on the Sig website and now don't find it.  Maybe another change at Sig?  I'm going to look again at the hobby shop.  Now the website shows about three grades or weights of 'tissue'.   I'm not sure what's what.

Dave

OK thank you Dave.. I was just confused there for a second.

Mike

Offline FLOYD CARTER

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4462
    • owner
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #16 on: June 19, 2013, 11:53:22 AM »
I'm not sure, but I think I have a plane covered with SIG plyspan.  It is lighter than SGM silkspan.

I looked at the K&S website.  They don't show any kind of silkspan.  I had a full tube (10 or 15 sheets) of K&S heavy grade.  Good stuff, but it's all gone now.

Having no more silkspan, I recently covered with polyspan.  It's difficult to use because, sooner or later, you have to begin sanding on the clear dope.  It's too easy to sand too much and into the polyspan.  Once that happens, you are in for a fight trying to repair/smooth over the "fuzzies".

Floyd
90 years, but still going (mostly)
AMA #796  SAM #188  LSF #020

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10478
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #17 on: June 19, 2013, 02:14:29 PM »
Maybe a return to silk is in order. I still have some SGM (enough for a few more planes, anyway). then I may have to go to silk or rayon.
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell

Offline Jim Thomerson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2087
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #18 on: June 19, 2013, 03:02:17 PM »
I have a good bit of various colors of plyspan and tissues of various origins.  I'm just about going all silk.  I finished a small 1/4A size airplane in silk and it came out just fine. 

Offline Balsa Butcher

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2357
  • High Desert Flier
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #19 on: June 19, 2013, 05:21:14 PM »
I know what you mean Floyd. Despite this I just finished covering a wing with "Polyester Tissue". I think it is the stuff that Tom Morris sells although I got mine some time ago from CLC. Lighter than the Polyspan I had used in the past and easy to use. I may change my opinion after I start sanding but so far I like it. Fuselage and curves still good 'ol silkspan. 8)
Pete Cunha
Sacramento CA.
AMA 57499

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22797
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #20 on: June 20, 2013, 07:46:45 AM »
I have used poly-span on several planes and only bad result was when I held the hot air gun in one spot to long.   But, a simple patch was put on and after about six coats of clear dope could not feel where the patch was.   I usually start with two coats of clear thinned enough to brush.   Run my hands over the surface and lightly sand the edges some, but not too much.   Then several more coats of dope and light sanding of some rough areas.   By the time I get to where there is no roughness the surface is getting a kind of sheen to it.   Then I start with the fill coats and spackling for the bad spots.   Once I have the surface to my satisfaction I put on a couple of clear coats to seal the fill coats and then go with the colors.   

Most of this is similar to what Sparky does when he is doing base coats.   But, I think my next one will have SLC over the open bays with Poly-span over that as well as all the other surfaces.
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline FLOYD CARTER

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4462
    • owner
Re: Silkspan?
« Reply #21 on: June 21, 2013, 09:14:15 AM »
My recent Polyspan covering job cost me a lot of extra work.  First problem was with heat shrinking.  Those heat-shrink materials look great when first done, but wrinkles seem to appear by magic at a later time.

The "fuzzies" with Polyspan are difficult to repair.  I finally resorted to some Brodak White Primer.  Heavy stuff, brushed on and carefully sanded.  Lucky for me the damage was over the sheeted leading edge, where I later painted.  If that happened on a clear doped surface, I might have stripped it all off.

Floyd
90 years, but still going (mostly)
AMA #796  SAM #188  LSF #020


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here