News:



  • June 19, 2025, 01:43:58 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Colossus building question  (Read 1348 times)

Offline James Mills

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1304
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Colossus building question
« on: June 24, 2009, 07:25:43 PM »
I have an Umland kit of the Colossus that I'm going to build this fall and was curious what weight I should aim for?

Thanks,

James
AMA 491167

Offline James Mills

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1304
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Colossus building question
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2009, 08:36:27 PM »
Ty,

Thanks for the reply.  I'm not going to start mine until I finish a few other projects.  I've a PA 40RE/muffler I'm going to use.

James
AMA 491167

Offline Steve Helmick

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10265
Re: Colossus building question
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2009, 09:46:49 PM »
My recollection is that the Colossus is around 750 square inches. I know the PA .40 is a strong engine, but I'd want more cubic inches. I've seen Gordan Delaney fly his Colossus with a Glenn Dye reworked ST G.51.  ;D Steve
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

Offline James Mills

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1304
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Colossus building question
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2009, 11:09:47 PM »
I spoke with Randy when I first got the kit and he said the 40 would be plenty (it's the big one).  If all else fails I have a 61 as well.  According to the plans it's 698 sq.

Thanks,

James
AMA 491167

Offline john e. holliday

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22974
Re: Colossus building question
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2009, 09:29:13 AM »
Jim,  go with the big engine.  The plane is huge.  I have seen Gordon's version in person and it is huge.  I would say the .51 would be the smallest engine to even think about. 

Now Gordon is a prolific builder and can finish light.  Look him up on here or thru John Miller in members lists.  Type in full name and you will find it sooner.  Send them a PM or E-Mail.  They are terrific gentlemen.  DOC Holliday
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Bill Little

  • 2017
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12668
  • Second in COMMAND
Re: Colossus building question
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2009, 08:29:55 AM »
Hi James,

When this first hit, I missed it, sorry!  I would normally agree with bigger is better, but in this case, I am going with Randy Smith.  The PA 40 you have will power basically any plane that a ST G51 will, if set up and run properly.  I have had some VERY, VERY good ST G51s and also we have a PA 40.  So I can say the PA 40 will do the job.  it ain't your Grandma's 40! LL~ LL~  A PA 40 will fly the old ST 60 planes with no problems up to the 70 oz. range.   Now, a PA 51 will do even more!  And the PA 61 will not even know it is running...... ;D

Big Bear
Big Bear <><

Aberdeen, NC

James Hylton Motorsports/NASCAR/ARCA

AMA 95351 (got one of my old numbers back! ;D )

Trying to get by

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10476
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: Colossus building question
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2009, 08:57:13 PM »
I also have the Umland kit. I plan to use a Magnum 53 in mine, though a PA 40UL may get the call if it comes out nose heavy. The PA 40UL has plenty of grunt.
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell

Tags: