News:



  • April 27, 2024, 05:24:42 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: 1/16" Fuselage sides  (Read 1945 times)

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6124
1/16" Fuselage sides
« on: January 09, 2024, 08:56:21 AM »
I am about to try a building technique that I have never used before in hopes of having a lighter rear fuselage.  I am using 8lb 1/16 instead of 6lb 1/8" for the sides and a geodetic box for the frame.  The top and bottom "blocks" will be 1/16" molded. Does anyone have experience with this or would like to talk me off of the ledge?

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Steve Berry

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 449
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2024, 09:06:40 AM »
Sounds very similar to what AL did on the BBQB Bearcat.

Choose proper grain orientation, reinforce appropriately, should be fine. If needed, glue 1/16" - 1/8" upper/lower longer one to increase the glue surface for the molded blocks, and you should be fine.

Also, remember - tight joints to make it a monocoque structure (eggshell, not bomb casing).

Steve

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk


Offline Dennis Toth

  • 2020 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4228
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2024, 09:16:51 AM »
Ken,
Using the heavier stronger 1/16" wood works well just add a few additional formers to reduce any soft spots in the sides (when gorilla hands pick up the ship). Use some cross bracing top and bottom will reduce twisting. Try to use tight grain wood for the sides. Keep us posted on your progress.

Best,    DennisT

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13741
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2024, 09:59:24 AM »
Should be plenty strong enough in general. The issue is that it gives you very little tolerance for sanding or misalignment.

    Brett

Offline Dave_Trible

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6153
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2024, 10:25:19 AM »
If you dope on a layer of .02 carbon veil it will make it stronger.  My latest I used 3/32" (about 6#) sides and bottom with a 1/16" top shell.  The only trouble was the 1/16" scalloping some between bulkheads on the top. It may have better to use 3/32" or harder 1/16".  It came out of my 'light' stack to make the shaping of the curvature without cracking.  Had to glue in some 1/32" fill with a little blue putty.  Still it turned out really light.  My concern is the rather rough grass field I fly from.  The carbon I hope keeps the tail attached on washboard landings.

Dave
AMA 20934
FAA Certificate FA3ATY4T94

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6124
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2024, 11:40:36 AM »
Should be plenty strong enough in general. The issue is that it gives you very little tolerance for sanding or misalignment.

    Brett
I will use the lost foam method to mold and cut the formers for the decks.  I used stringers on Endgame III turtle deck since it was 23" long.  Two years now and no sagging.  I am worried about sanding the fuselage joints so I will be adding soft 1/16" x 1/8" doublers on the inside top and bottom to make sure I can sand the curve.  Also makes mating the moldings a piece of cake.

I scrapped the 6lb 1/8" sides and remade them with 8lb 1/16.  They are 22grams lighter!  Thats 60+ grams I don't have to add to the nose to keep the CG. It all adds up.

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6124
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2024, 11:47:49 AM »
My concern is the rather rough grass field I fly from.  The carbon I hope keeps the tail attached on washboard landings.

Dave
You need to perfect the "controlled stall into the wind hover and plop" landing!   LL~

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Brett Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 13741
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2024, 11:49:27 AM »
I will use the lost foam method to mold and cut the formers for the decks.  I used stringers on Endgame III turtle deck since it was 23" long.  Two years now and no sagging.  I am worried about sanding the fuselage joints so I will be adding soft 1/16" x 1/8" doublers on the inside top and bottom to make sure I can sand the curve.

I scrapped the 6lb 1/8" sides and remade them with 8lb 1/16.  They are 22grams lighter!  Thats 60+ grams I don't have to add to the nose to keep the CG. It all adds up.

Ken

   I have been using 3/32 for a long time, but I went back to 1/8 on the last airplane because I have plenty of 4 lb wood, and the thickness makes it easier otherwise.

     Brett

Online Lauri Malila

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1633
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2024, 12:34:12 PM »
If you make fuselage sides a little curved in fuselage cross section, that will increase the form stability a lot. L

Offline Steve Berry

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 449
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2024, 01:37:16 PM »
I would also suggest an internal tripler around the wing opening to give yourself more "meat" for the wing to glue to.

Steve

Offline Dave_Trible

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6153
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #10 on: January 09, 2024, 02:52:13 PM »
I would also suggest an internal tripler around the wing opening to give yourself more "meat" for the wing to glue to.

Steve
And a place to put your fingers for a pull test!  No Keystone Cops routines!

Dave
AMA 20934
FAA Certificate FA3ATY4T94

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6124
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #11 on: January 09, 2024, 04:04:18 PM »
If you make fuselage sides a little curved in fuselage cross section, that will increase the form stability a lot. L
I thought about that and even drew some formers but changed my mind.  I don't have any way of forming it without some form of jig.  You are absolutely right, curved surfaces would be better, just not do-able.

I got this idea from getting to see the inside of an aft fuselage from one of our better builders that happened to "land" spinner first at a very steep angle of attack under full power and literally exploded.  I got to thinking 8lb 1/16 is the same weight as 4lb 1/8 and I haven't seen anything lighter than 6lb in a decade.

Ken

TO Dave and Steve:

wing will have 1/4" internal and external fillets.  I use the old wingtip grip for the pull test.

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Steve Berry

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 449
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #12 on: January 09, 2024, 04:56:17 PM »
Nicely done. I was thinking about that very thing, internal "Warren truss" framework on the fuselage sides.

Ken, if there's enough of us local, what do think of a group building session once a week? Can trade ideas and such. Building with friends is better than building alone.

Steve

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk


Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6124
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #13 on: January 09, 2024, 05:06:29 PM »
Nicely done. I was thinking about that very thing, internal "Warren truss" framework on the fuselage sides.

Ken, if there's enough of us local, what do think of a group building session once a week? Can trade ideas and such. Building with friends is better than building alone.

Steve

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk


I would love to but I simply can't.  I am still working and the office is just too small.  It is a good idea though.

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Steve Berry

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 449
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #14 on: January 09, 2024, 06:41:35 PM »
I would love to but I simply can't.  I am still working and the office is just too small.  It is a good idea though.

Ken
Is there someone else in our area who has a sizable workshop where we could build?
Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

Steve

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk


Offline Jim Svitko

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 694
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #15 on: January 09, 2024, 07:09:13 PM »
That truss method for stiffening the 1/16 fuselage sides works well enough.  I have been doing that for some time now with no issues.

Offline Ty Marcucci

  • 23 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 713
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #16 on: January 11, 2024, 08:20:58 PM »
What ever you do, be sure to warn your pit man just how thin the fuselage is.. I almost crushed Paul Walkers P47 one year as it was so very light and thin... H^^
Ty Marcucci

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6124
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #17 on: January 11, 2024, 08:45:12 PM »
What ever you do, be sure to warn your pit man just how thin the fuselage is.. I almost crushed Paul Walkers P47 one year as it was so very light and thin... H^^

I noticed today just how how easy it would be to crush it if you think it is solid 1/8.  I am going to add a few cross bars once I have the pushrods in so I don't block them.  The frame is really solid and light.

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Howard Rush

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7812
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #18 on: January 11, 2024, 11:31:56 PM »
What ever you do, be sure to warn your pit man just how thin the fuselage is.. I almost crushed Paul Walkers P47 one year as it was so very light and thin... H^^

Ty’s hard on flaps, too.
The Jive Combat Team
Making combat and stunt great again

Offline Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6124
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #19 on: January 12, 2024, 01:51:33 PM »
Since my search for reasonably priced 1/16" plywood failed I am using equally expensive yet readily available .3 and .5mm carbon fiber sheet where I would use plywood.   What is the best glue for CF sheet, it is not pours like the CF tubes.  CA works well but I worry about it's brittle nature and what happens when things vibrate.  Does Epoxy have the same issues?  I have JB Weld.  It is the same color!  What say you?

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Steve Berry

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 449
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #20 on: January 12, 2024, 03:46:38 PM »
I would say regular epoxy should work. If you have West Systems available, use some of that. Typically, carbon fiber parts are made from epoxy, and epoxy should stick quite well to epoxy.

That's my $.02

Steve

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk


Offline Dave_Trible

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6153
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #21 on: January 12, 2024, 05:49:09 PM »
Epoxy is best BUT secondary bonds are never as strong as the original material.  Back when I was designing boats for a living for Mark Twain Marine we had issues with motor mounts- set in to the hull later- cracking loose with engine torque.  We had to add in special shop instructions to grind the surfaces where the new bond was to be made before setting in the mounts.   Epoxies and other resins leave a slick surface and sometimes also mold release wax works it's way to the top.  Those carbon sheets may have some mold release imbedded.   Sand well and clean with alcohol and a soft rag before glue up.  Should be OK after that.

Dave
AMA 20934
FAA Certificate FA3ATY4T94

Offline Miotch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 147
Re: 1/16" Fuselage sides
« Reply #22 on: January 15, 2024, 06:52:57 AM »
Love it.  Nice job !!  I never have any idea what my wood weight is.  I will generally try and pick something lighter and more bendable for forming.  But a lot of time, I just have to make do with whatever wood I have that will fit.  I last ordered balsa about 20 years ago and my supply is dwindling down to dregs and scraps.


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here