News:


  • April 30, 2024, 03:30:11 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: OK Cub Performance Numbers?  (Read 961 times)

Offline propjobbill

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • New Pilot
  • *
  • Posts: 6
OK Cub Performance Numbers?
« on: September 10, 2008, 12:25:50 AM »
" OK Cub .074 Performance Numbers?"


 

              


I am think about buying a couple of .074 Cub engines. I have only owned 1 OK Cub .049. I was very unhappy with the power that engine had. I can honestly say it was one of the lowest porer .049 engines I have ever owned.

If you own or have owned a Cub .074, or know anyone that does. Can you give me an Idea of what kink of rpm I can expect running a 6x3 prop with 20% nitro or a 7x3 prop.. Would one of these engines for example run better or worse than a cox sure start..

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

Offline Ralph Wenzel (d)

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 848
Re: OK Cub Performance Numbers?
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2008, 05:31:22 AM »
Talk with Larry Renger. He used to give clinics (seances?) on getting better performances from OK engines.

Ralph
(Too many irons; not enough fire)

Ralph Wenzel
AMA 495785 League City, TX

Offline Just One-eye

  • Another Old Fart
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 198
Re: OK Cub Performance Numbers?
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2008, 05:53:57 AM »
I never saw a Cub at any size that could match to Cox engines.  They all seemed to be wimps, although the 14 was easy to start and easy to get a needle on, it was more like a Cox Queen Bee in power output (a Medallion 09 would blow it away).  I tried several OK 049s, the 074, and the 09 back when Herkimer used to run their back page ad every month on Air Trails (mid-1950's). 

However, some people had better luck -- Larry claimed to do so, and so did Currell Patty (hmmm?  has Currell ever put in an appearance here?)


Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: OK Cub Performance Numbers?
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2008, 02:05:21 PM »
If the weather holds here in Toronto,
the Balsa Beavers are going to have a
Musciano event tomorrow.
  I've built a 120 gram Musiano Mustang
hollow log, powered by a new/old
1952 OK Cub 'B'.

Turning a 5.5" x 4.5" and using
Sig 35% nitro I'm getting consistant
runs at 11,500 rpm. Extra castor too.
Plenty of power for this plane!

   I'm using a balloon tank for the first time,
just a balloon, not a pressure bladder, and
it seems to be the way to go. It holds
one ounce and gives me 180 to 150 second
runs.

Hope this helps - Morgan
« Last Edit: February 06, 2009, 06:31:40 PM by goozgog »
Keith Morgan

Offline ray copeland

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 871
Re: OK Cub Performance Numbers?
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2008, 08:19:11 PM »
Very cool plane Morgan!! The balloon tanks are the best, good luck in your event...
Ray from Greensboro, North Carolina , six laps inverted so far with my hand held vertically!!! (forgot to mention, none level!) AMA# 902150

Offline Bill Heher

  • Fix-it
  • 2020 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 941
  • I may not always BOM- but I do the re-builds!
Re: OK Cub Performance Numbers?
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2008, 08:25:16 PM »
Are the balloons you are using the littlr thumb size ones that cme in the " Water Bomb" bag with a little funnel for filling from the hose? That's all I can find around here besides the big party balloons.
Bill Heher
Central Florida and across the USA!
If it's broke Fix-it
If it ain't broke- let me see it for a minute AMA 264898- since 1988!

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3997
Re: OK Cub Performance Numbers?
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2008, 10:48:52 PM »
No, the balloons are usually 12" helium balloons, and do NOT provide pressure fuel draw.

Recently, I have been experimenting with very thin Polyethylene bags for the "balloon" and haven't had total success, but very encouraging results.  More as I learn.....
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline ray copeland

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 871
Re: OK Cub Performance Numbers?
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2008, 12:17:28 AM »
My findings are that the 9" helium balloons are ideal if you can find them, Wally World stopped carrying that size for some reason. Sometimes you can buy the assortment and find several of the 9" ones in the bag. The 7" will work for a little shorter runs , i use the 12" inch ones when i have to but it is hard to find a holder that fits them properly and is not to large for the airplane. Like Larry mentioned, i too have not gotten the thin plastic bags to work to my satisfaction yet!!
Ray from Greensboro, North Carolina , six laps inverted so far with my hand held vertically!!! (forgot to mention, none level!) AMA# 902150

Offline goozgog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: OK Cub Performance Numbers?
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2008, 04:25:39 AM »
Thanks for the encouragement Ray!

The balloons I'm using are 7" with the
neck cut off to shorten it.
I made these tanks using the hard
plastic tube that comes with Sullivan
tanks. I slipped 1/2" of sillicon fuel line
onto the tube where I wanted to bind
the balloon. I used one strand of copper
wire stripped from 14 ga muli-strand to
bind the balloon to the fuel line.
A drop of CA on the wire for luck.
No leaks so far!

   A bit off topic.
The canopy was made using the
Hot air gun/ mineral water bottle"
technique. It took less than 20 minutes
to carve the pine mold and make the
canopy. It's perfect!
This has got to be the slickest technique
I've ever heard of!

OK, I'm writing this after the Balsa Beavers
Musciano event Sat morning.
  The Mustang won 1st in Stunt and
second in Concours.
  I managed inside loops, lazy eights,
sustained inverted and a reverse wing over.
Not bad for a '50's OK Cub!
  Mr. Chris Brownhill placed second with
a Blackhawk Little Devil and a new
Herkimer/Blackhawk OK Cub "A" with
the red plastic tank. His engine has
considerably better compression than
mine. I assume that the new engines are
assembled with more care these days.
The Little Devil has a tiny wing but the
Cub yanked it through two consecutive loops.
Very consistant runs. (Great pilot too!)

It's worth noting that all of the other entries
had Cox Black Widows. Everyone was amazed
what the old OK engines can do!
« Last Edit: February 06, 2009, 06:32:44 PM by goozgog »
Keith Morgan


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here