News:


  • May 29, 2024, 03:03:44 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!  (Read 2301 times)

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« on: September 09, 2009, 04:30:52 PM »
Well, after a couple of years of procrastination and the better part of 6 months off and on work, here it is!  The model was originally built by Don Butman.  There were problems with the hinges, and the film he used leaked fuel into the structure after a very few flights.  Much work to remove the oil!

Anyway, it is rip-snorting ready to go.  Covering on the wings is Polyspan, the fuselage and tail covered with plain wrapping tissue (prepare to sand a lot! that stuff is lumpy).  Fillets on the wing are leather.  Finish is Butyrate all the way.  Decals are on inkjet decal paper, overcoated with butyrate before application.

Weight ready to fly will be about 11 ounces, rather a bit heavy, but I think it will be OK. 

The model is a 50% scaledown of the Green-Box Nobler.  Were I do do one from scratch, it would be about a 65% Gieskie Nobler, but what do I want, egg in my beer (popular in Japan, BTW!)?
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline Jeffrey Olijar

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2009, 04:54:49 PM »
I like it.  ;D
If it ain't broke, fix it till it is.

Offline ray copeland

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 871
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2009, 05:21:48 PM »
Larry, looks good!!  What's the engine and tank?  Waitin' for a flight report!
Ray from Greensboro, North Carolina , six laps inverted so far with my hand held vertically!!! (forgot to mention, none level!) AMA# 902150

Offline Jim Moffatt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 114
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2009, 05:32:57 PM »
Great job Larry! I'm still enjoying your FM article on the 1/2A Magician. How many sq inches is the wing?

I hope to build a full fuse 1/2A plane soon. Have been looking at the RSM Pinto or a scale down of the Brodak Fancy Pants. I will use electric power.

Offline Jim Thomerson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2087
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2009, 06:36:56 PM »
George Aldrich drew up plans for 1/2A Nobler, Agwagon, and Magnum in at least two sizes.  A bunch (six each, maybe) of these went out at one of the Aldrich auctions at a VSC,and no, I did not get one.  And that is the last I ever heard of them. 

Offline jim gilmore

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1216
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2009, 06:44:49 PM »
 i love it.  looks good.

Offline Robert McHam

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1052
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2009, 09:31:20 PM »
Oh my Larry, it does look nice. A lot of work in the finish to be sure. Not overlooking the prep work to make the recovering to get it that way.
I especially like the mirror image "Baby Nobler" decals on the wings.

Robert
Crop circles are simply open invitations to fly C/L!

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2009, 11:36:17 PM »
The 1/2A Magician has 230 sq.in. wing.  It is sized nicely for a .049, and a bit small for a .061.  I flew Antone Kephart's new model Sunday.  It has my most hopped-up AP Wasp on it.  On 50' lines it was too fast, even with a 6x2 prop.  He was burning 25% Nitro, so we guess the thing was doing 24K in the air.  His "old" model has a pressureized Tee Dee .049 on it driving a 6x3 prop on 48' lines, and that combo works very well indeed.

My original model was slightly over 10 ounces, if I recall correctly.  Antone's are around 9 ounces.

The Wasp in question has Jan's venturi at .125" diameter and an old Norvel pressure tap backplate.  In addition the engine has been "flow relieved", that is, everything in the way of smooth airflow internally has been corrected to the best of my ability.  (No changes to timing!) Beyond that, the crankpin was drilled out for better balance, and the crank polished to fit the case perfectly.  (Unlike Cox, Norvel, VA, Brodak and others, the AP has a bronze bushed case, and you could actually lap the crank in safely).  Break-in per the instructions, 40 minutes on 25% oil fuel (steel crank, bronze bushing, gotta do it right!)

On the high (for that engine) nitro, and long lines, it takes about 1-1/8 ounce to do the pattern.  Antone plans to add a couple of more feet of line, and may go to a 3" pitch prop if needed to get the line tension back.  He is trying to get to 4.5 second or longer lap times, and probably will be able to do so.  Even at the just over 4 second laps, the model is a real pleasure to fly.  He also can drop his oil % and go to 15% Nitro to cut the power a bit and get much better fuel economy.
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #8 on: September 09, 2009, 11:47:12 PM »
Sorry, missed a question.   The model has 165 sq.in. wing, so it is the same size and weight as the old Cox Super Stunter and the newer Hyper Viper.  However, it has a Norvel Big Mig .049 in it and flaps.  As such, I think it will turn a respectable pattern, even at the weight it carries.  We'll see (very cautiously!!!)  I do think first flights will be over grass, with the CG way too far forward.  I do not want to plough this baby in due to instability.  I have no idea what the bellcrank size is, but am willing to bet it is 2", where 2.5 or even 3 is really needed for a 1/2A to get away from squirilieness.

If all it will do is fly level at first, I will be well satisfied!  I can work on it from there.

The tank will be one of my floppy balloons.  I expect 3/4 ounce will do the pattern.  Prop currently is a 5x3 Tornado.  I expect that will change, but it is a safe choice for first flights.

I wonder if I can claim it was an ARC?
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline minnesotamodeler

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2335
  • Me and my Chief Engineer
    • Minnesotamodeler
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #9 on: September 10, 2009, 05:30:18 AM »

Very nice...I like the included Fox .35 for size reference!
--Ray 
Roseville MN (St. Paul suburb, Arctic Circle)
AMA902472

Offline jim gilmore

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1216
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #10 on: September 10, 2009, 07:57:23 AM »
So what is the wingspan ?
you said 50% is it 26 "?
I like it very much. y1

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #11 on: September 20, 2009, 03:51:50 PM »
Wingspan is 28", and estimated wing area is 160 sq.in.

I have about 4 flights on the model, and it shows, much to my surprise, competitive potential.  So far, it is underpowered with the Norvel .049, so an AP Wasp goes in it ASAP.  In addition, it has about 3/4 oz noseweight, and is still a bit squirrely (Who knows what the control geometry is!).  I have reduced the handle spacing, and will try removing the "exponential" function of my handle to tame the extremes of control.  it is plenty smooth horizontal and upright, but tends to overcontrol on round maneuvers.

There is NO hint of mush or stall, even in super tight corners.  I am VERY impressed.   #^
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline Roger Vizioli

  • CLiner
  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1171
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #12 on: September 20, 2009, 05:08:35 PM »
Very nice Larry!
Roger Vizioli
"thinkin' small, ya'all".
I can, I live in the south!  :-)
Roger Vizioli
AMA L-2408
Florida/Space Coast

Offline minnesotamodeler

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2335
  • Me and my Chief Engineer
    • Minnesotamodeler
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #13 on: September 22, 2009, 07:05:09 PM »
Wingspan is 28", and estimated wing area is 160 sq.in.

I have about 4 flights on the model, and it shows, much to my surprise, competitive potential.  So far, it is underpowered with the Norvel .049, so an AP Wasp goes in it ASAP.  In addition, it has about 3/4 oz noseweight, and is still a bit squirrely (Who knows what the control geometry is!).  I have reduced the handle spacing, and will try removing the "exponential" function of my handle to tame the extremes of control.  it is plenty smooth horizontal and upright, but tends to overcontrol on round maneuvers.

There is NO hint of mush or stall, even in super tight corners.  I am VERY impressed.   #^

I've been putting 3" bellcranks in my 1/2A stunt planes, with full 180 d. (well, maybe 170d.) movement and a very short pushrod arm, to slow down the controls.  Makes the plane react more like a bigger model, instead of the typical twitchy 1/2A.  I even put a 2 1/4" BC in my latest .020-powered plane. It makes a diffference.
--Ray 
Roseville MN (St. Paul suburb, Arctic Circle)
AMA902472

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #14 on: September 23, 2009, 10:57:29 PM »
When I build the plane, I am definitely on board with the big bellcranks.  The Sky Sport includes a 2.75" one as part of the package.  The Nobler was a gift from Don Butman, and it has whatever it has, and I need to work with that.  The baby Magician uses a 3" bellcrank.
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #15 on: September 29, 2009, 10:25:24 PM »
I added yet another .3 oz of noseweight, and made up a non-expo insert for my handle that is about 1.5 inches across.  I should eventually reach a point where all I can do is fly level, then work back from there   VD~

The model is clearly tail heavy, as it becomes uncontrollable on landing, wanting to stall at the last instant, no matter how I try to set it down.  The original Green Box Nobler had built-up tail surfaces and the rear of the fuselage was cut out for lightness.  This model has neither, and the tail wood isn't all that light.  I should have corrected all that when re-finishing it, but too late now!

It probably will end up a very lovely hangar queen, but I want to see how well it CAN fly first.  It certainly has me re-thinking the issue of flaps on a 1/2A model, and the weight it can carry.
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #16 on: October 02, 2009, 10:14:50 PM »
Getting there!  The little gem now is flying pretty well.  I got in a short flight this morning, cut short when the balloon tank ruptured ( NEVER had that happen before!!).  I saved the plane with only a busted prop.  I suspect there is a rough spot inside the tank compartment, and will check that out.  Anyway, the loops were way smoother than ever before without the surprise square corner added.  Still sensitive, but flyable.  More as it develops!  I may put the balloon inside a plastic bag to protect it.
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #17 on: October 05, 2009, 06:22:22 PM »
Bingo!  The model is tuned great, now.  Did the whole pattern this morning.  It is going too fast, though.  I need to switch to a lower pitch prop.  I was flying with a Tornado 5x3.  I think the APC 5.5x2.5 or even the 6x2 may be needed.
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22783
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #18 on: October 12, 2009, 08:53:23 AM »
Good news, so now where do we get plans?  DOC Holliday
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #19 on: October 12, 2009, 02:58:56 PM »
It is a 50% scale-down of the Green Box Nobler, part for part.  It was built by Don Butman along with another one that is now the property of Bill Heyworth in Tucson.  Bill has never attempted to fly his, so far as I know.   Get a set of Nobler plans and parts and head for Kinko's and you are in business.

If I were doing one, I would aim for 200 sq.in.  not the 160 that this model has.

BTW, I decided to "quit winners" and retired the model.  I have learned all I think I can from it, and it is just too cute to allow it to get mangled in an accident.
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline jim gilmore

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1216
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #20 on: October 12, 2009, 04:18:21 PM »
I'm curious. As i've said the best flying 1/2A kit i've flown was the topflite kits from way back when.They were 144 square inch wings. why does everyone think 200 or more ? is  stock nobler is 52 " isn't  26" w/s. If I remember the dim's for the topflite (3) that I flew the mean chord was either 5.5 or 6. inches so an extra 2 inches would add about 12 more sq in. bringing the total to about 156. So 160 sou7nds quite good to me.
So I'm just curious if goin bigger is a question of I need more power so I build it bigger and use the top power engines in that size ?
I'dlike to see what you all come up if you could be made to build with the cox sure start series ?




Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #21 on: October 12, 2009, 05:38:27 PM »
There are a gazillion trade-offs with stunt models.  The Top Flite planes you loved would fly beautifully with a Sure-start engine.  You could probably go as far as 180 sq.in. with a well designed stunter for that engine.  Here in So.CA, we fly 1cc with Schneurle ported fire-breathing engines, and long lines, so the game is different.  Look up the thread on my Tech Terror to see a design that is just about right for the Sure-start, though it flies with a Golden Bee.  The larger (Baby Flite Streak, Baby Clown, Baby Lightning Streak) Brodak kits are just fine for full stunt performance with a Cox Reedie.  Also check out the models from minnesotamodeler, he has a wide range of planes for different engines.

What it boils down to, is that first you pick your power system, then you select the appropriate model for it.  Careful observation of what people are flying with which engine can give you good input on size.  Here is my take on what works. (I just donned my bulletproof vest, riot mask and Kevlar cup)

Pee Wee .020   80 sq.in.
Tee Dee .020  105 sq.in.  (gee, that happens to match the 1/2A Snapper   =)   )
Cox basic Reed engines    125 to 160 sq.in.
Cox Killer Bee and Venom   150 to 200 sq.in.
Brodak Mk 1 & 2 unmodified  160 to 180 sq.in.
Tee Dee engines  175 to 220 sq.in.
Norvel, AP Wasp .061  200 to 250 sq.in.

Nowte that a modified Brodak .061 is in the same ballpark as the AP Wasp, it just costs a lot more after you add the Nelson head
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline minnesotamodeler

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2335
  • Me and my Chief Engineer
    • Minnesotamodeler
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #22 on: October 12, 2009, 07:11:40 PM »
I think you're right on the mark with those estimates, Larry...the Snapper will indeed fly well with a good .020.  Mine has a wimpy surestart .049 in it; I think my TeeDee .020 would pull it better.

Weights would also be a useful addition to your list; it makes a big difference. My DoubleeDee stunter is 255 sq. in., seemingly too big for the Norvel BigMig .049 in it, but it weighs around 11 oz. and flies very, very well. I was going to try an .061 in it but it flies so well with the .049 I never did it.

 My .020-size planes average around 2 - 2.5 oz.  My Snapper is around 5 oz.; the planes I designed around the surestarts are in the 110-140 sq. in. range, and about 7- 8 oz. or so.

These are all RTF weights, including engine but excluding fuel load.
--Ray 
Roseville MN (St. Paul suburb, Arctic Circle)
AMA902472

Offline ray copeland

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 871
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #23 on: October 12, 2009, 07:35:59 PM »
Wow a lot of useful info for 1/2a flyers!! Maybe someone could put these findings in a chart or spreadsheet.  :!
Ray from Greensboro, North Carolina , six laps inverted so far with my hand held vertically!!! (forgot to mention, none level!) AMA# 902150

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Baby Nobler - DONE!!!
« Reply #24 on: October 13, 2009, 03:54:12 PM »
A 3-D chart with size, weight and performance as the axies would be the ticket!
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here