stunthanger.com

Vendors Corner => Tim's Universal Timers => Topic started by: Tim Wescott on January 31, 2015, 09:23:47 AM

Title: Minimized TUT
Post by: Tim Wescott on January 31, 2015, 09:23:47 AM
With the interest generated for the TUT from Fred Cronnenwett's column in the Februrary 2015 Model Aviation, I have decided that I'm going to build a version that strips out the expensive inertial measuring devices (gyro and accelerometer), and only does tasks that involve input and output on the four servo ports.

Unless Fred objects with the implied use of his name, I'll be calling this the "TUT-FC".  The TUT-FC will share the following features with the full-sized TUT:


I am taking orders for the TUT-FC now.  They're selling for $40 each.  They come pre-loaded with Howard's FAI program, but you must let me know if you want Fred's engine sequencing program loaded.

Contact me:

Via a PM here;

By email at tim@wescottdesign.com;

By snail-mail at

Tim Wescott
TUT Timer
PO Box 3237
Oregon City, OR 97045

By phone

503.631.7815  (please leave a message if I don't pick up).
Title: Re: Minimized TUT
Post by: Crist Rigotti on February 19, 2015, 10:39:41 PM
Tim,
So the TUT-FC has the ability to perform cut-off loops?
Title: Re: Minimized TUT
Post by: Tim Wescott on February 20, 2015, 08:43:56 AM
The TUT-FC cannot do cutoff loops, or count laps.  That's because the gyro chip that enables doing such things is a good proportion of the total parts cost of the board -- leaving it out of the assembly is part of what allowed me to reduce the price.

A TUT-HR, or a full TUT would be needed for cutoff loops.
Title: Re: Minimized TUT
Post by: Crist Rigotti on February 20, 2015, 09:07:18 AM
The TUT-FC cannot do cutoff loops, or count laps.  That's because the gyro chip that enables doing such things is a good proportion of the total parts cost of the board -- leaving it out of the assembly is part of what allowed me to reduce the price.

A TUT-HR, or a full TUT would be needed for cutoff loops.

Thanks Tim.