stunthanger.com
Design => Stunt design => Topic started by: Air Ministry . on December 20, 2007, 10:02:24 PM
-
any one know how to pull the little pictures of my little aeroplanes of the Barton thingo. ? ?
under "pictures " - 'aerobatics '. to put here to keep you lot ammused ( particularly Mr Adaminson of high A R )
and place here also . please , etc .
we will avoid the computor lecture .
These wonderous contrivances might cheer you miserable lot up for CHRISTMASS .
If not theyll be plenty to whinge about , which should keep you going ; AKA ,
critical analysis , or ' wot the hecks that , etc, etc .
-
HI Matthew,
I cannot find where your pictures are already posted. (??) We could post them here no problem.
-
Did they turn up in your email ? programmes 'copy shop ' .
-
Hey, if you supply link to pictures, I will post them, ok? Keith
-
Now ,Bills got the pictures , dennis has got the pictures , and Kieths got the pictures . Via E'mail .
Now my opinion of computer assisted design ,matches the appearance of the pictures . !
One step forward and ten steps back . To keep it plight .It would be a gross exageration to say somethings going on in this particular instance . As its fairly evient two tenths of five eigths of stuff all (as they used to say ) has gone on . As its not B..... there , or conspicuous by its absence . to be politer .
The wonders of modern tecnology .
-
Matt noooo oone cann figuuure out whattt yooou are speakkking to. yoU donl''tt make sEnce. I lIKe you pictures just fine. iF thEy are as gooooooog as youe rrr wrighttinG evryOONNE wil go to. yEp it is haRd to stop.Ge this is Fast.
Ed
-
Matthew, I cannot speak for the others, but I have simply not had the time to convert the pictures, and host them to my site. If there is a simple *one click* operation that would make this all happen for me, I would have already had it done.
-
Matt noooo oone cann figuuure out whattt yooou are speakkking to. yoU donl''tt make sEnce. I lIKe you pictures just fine. iF thEy are as gooooooog as youe rrr wrighttinG evryOONNE wil go to. yEp it is haRd to stop.Ge this is Fast.
Ed
We ?-- Schoo; fish ! . Must be the flouride in the water . (softens the brain) . These city slickers ,
Testing , 1/ 2/ 3/.
Now unfortunately I detest computors . But eventually onell get these little pictures to materialise here ,
Its not really my loss if they dont .Though the lack of flash finishes will disapoint the superficial folk.the
TOPIC is stunt DESIGN .(not ones evil designs , plotting / schemeing etc..
Think outside the square . - get a round tuit .
(possibly should be transfered to (attempts ) at humour at this stage .
-
Mat sent me his pictures but it took him three emails to tell me how smart he is and how brain dim I am. It took me all of 30 seconds to put his pictures here. Why not just ask for help.You might get it.
-
That will certainly qualify as a high aspect ratio design. What are the specifics? How does it fly?
The first photo does seem to have a thin wing. Maybe just the way the photo looks.
And Ed, thanks for helping Matt out with his photos.
Arch
-
Right . Help. What id like done is planting trees in the deserts of the planet , before we all shrivel up.
If theres enough reaforestation 'one' wont have to suck allthe water out of the aquafiers, So;
Ed , Id actually said your posts apear rational . Which is 'kiwi-speak' stating the obvious .
The head on shot is an MC 72 from back in 2000 , K&B torpedo .40. Probably the easiest plane (of over 100 ) ive flown to do an accurate pattern with .Though if the winds gusty it catches the floats a little,giving a bit of a weaver. misspellings probably correct . A new word ?
16 % airfoil . but its a Sesqui plane ?
57 span and Oz. Would build one identical scaled for a .60 too.
The greeny things 72 " span . Will give a bit of a bounce if you hit full up hard out of a wingover or hopurglass, if you dont get the timing right.(about 50% which aint bad for 71 Oz and 630 Sq. In wing area.),if I leave out the yards of spruce and epoxy, 1800 grammes will be not to difficult Intresting to fly in a 20 Kt wind ,Being 11 stone with the A/C weighing 71 Oz. ,
-
Arf arf arf.
-
That will certainly qualify as a high aspect ratio design. What are the specifics? How does it fly?
Arch
Having just flown a Cardinal and a Fancherised twister , or was it the other way ? ,
Its not bad , though apparently your only supposed to glide one lap. Where if you pull it through the cut , itl
do two.
Will get the Email cafe to reduce the other pics , one day .
Prefer the Mewgull and DeH 88 to anything ive flown. Comparable to a Norton Commando set up tight with a KR 76 front tyre.
Have to watch were your going ,but very accurate . Horses for courses ?
-
Matt,
My experience with high aspect planes suggests that a bit heavier is better to compensate for the insane amount of lift generated. A bit of weight and drag are not a bad thing.