News:



  • March 28, 2024, 04:30:25 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Floating Bellcrank  (Read 3261 times)

Online Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6036
Floating Bellcrank
« on: March 20, 2018, 03:20:01 PM »
I am installing a floating bellcrank from Tom Morris and would like to know if anybody has used a solid carbon fiber rod for the center post? (It will be in a 1/4 aluminum sleeve) I have had a poorly installed metal one bend on a pull test a gaszillion years ago before carbon.  Will it wear against a brass bushing?  Can it be lubed?  Am I an idiot?

Any advice will be appreciated.

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Howard Rush

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7805
Re: Floating Bellcrank
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2018, 04:01:19 PM »
I am installing a floating bellcrank from Tom Morris and would like to know if anybody has used a solid carbon fiber rod for the center post? (It will be in a 1/4 aluminum sleeve) I have had a poorly installed metal one bend on a pull test a gaszillion years ago before carbon. 

I'd think an aluminum tube could be lighter, although maybe harder to glue.

Will it wear against a brass bushing?

Yep

Can it be lubed? 

I have lubed carbon axles.  It didn't help much.  I tried heat-shrink Teflon tubing, too.  I forget whether that worked, but it was heavy. 

Am I an idiot?

Not based on this inquiry.  Had you considered Kevlar, that would be a different matter. 
The Jive Combat Team
Making combat and stunt great again

Online Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6036
Re: Floating Bellcrank
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2018, 04:42:22 PM »

Yep


That is the answer that I was hoping not to hear.  Everything short of ball bearings wears to some degree.  Any idea now bad?  I like the idea of carbon fiber because it is stronger and will not stay bent if I hit it it hard...but it does cut rather easily against the grain and I have visions of little gremlins in there sawing my bellcrank axel in half on every corner.

Thanks for the advice - Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Air Ministry .

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 4978
Re: Floating Bellcrank
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2018, 11:10:05 PM »
just did one , 1/8 steel rod , doubled in center 1 1/2 in. , brass washer Ea End .

5/32 brass tube in 1/8 ply ea side ( top & bottom ), second 1/8 ply lam outside mounts , tube bearings are 3/8 ,
center rod ( pivot 0 is full depth of wing.

Swings Free, No Slack . Brass on steel is maybe self lubing , buts vasilined after passivating ( Boiling in B Soda Sol'n .)

Was conveniant for this design , long 1/8 ply spar joiners - undercarage mount mounts - belcrank mounts ; Doublers
to ease any doubts, just little tube braces really .

The cranks drilled 1/8 x 2 at pivot , secondary 1/8 rod was filed flat to mate my crossed intersection ' 8 ' hole .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Been Figuring a outside take off / arm above / outside wing .

a z bend 1/8 or 5/32 wire pivot , second shorter wire as binding so cant screw loose ( control Failure ) .
Think it'd be a bit of a swine to assemble - sequential during construction - with instalation of the mounts .  :P

It'd get the pushrod perpendicular to the flap horns , at neutral , and the pushrod pretty much horizontal on this ship .

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

think Brass on Carbon would be better , self polishing . Alumn to soft , gall And Self Erode .
Wotter you gunna use for GLUE in there ? The Bellcranks glued to the toob ?? .

Offline Air Ministry .

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 4978
Re: Floating Bellcrank
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2018, 11:31:43 PM »
You probly wanna look up suitable bearing material for C / F toob ; nylon of phenolic resin stuff maybe .

Avoid sharp edes & burrs ! , chamfer the edges of whatever the bush is , or radius .
Barreled Bearings were derigure for flexable shafts , in infernal combustion engines .

Offline Avaiojet

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7468
  • Just here for the fun of it also.
Re: Floating Bellcrank
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2018, 09:12:25 AM »
This isn't my work, but I've done the install the same way using plywood!
Trump Derangement Syndrome. TDS. 
Avaiojet Derangement Syndrome. ADS.
Amazing how ignorance can get in the way of the learning process.
If you're Trolled, you know you're doing something right.  Alpha Mike Foxtrot. "No one has ever made a difference by being like everyone else."  Marcus Cordeiro, The "Mark of Excellence," you will not be forgotten. "No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot."- Mark Twain. I look at the Forum as a place to contribute and make friends, some view it as a Realm where they could be King.   Proverb 11.9  "With his mouth the Godless destroys his neighbor..."  "Perhaps the greatest challenge in modeling is to build a competitive control line stunter that looks like a real airplane." David McCellan, 1980.

Online Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6036
Re: Floating Bellcrank
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2018, 01:26:40 PM »
This isn't my work, but I've done the install the same way using plywood!

This has some posibilities.  Love the way it transfers the load to the spars, hence the whole wing and the braces pretty much guarantee you are not going to bend the axel on a pull test. The only thing I question is why doesn't the axel extend through the spar cap?  In one of those situations (that only happens to other people) where you lose tension and have to pray the bellcrank holds when it hits the lines on the other side, you are going to get the full initial force on either the up or down line.  If the axel extends through the spar and is in some way attached to the fuselage you have more than just the glue joint between you and a rebuilding session.  That would be my only change.

Ken
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12804
Re: Floating Bellcrank
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2018, 02:35:36 PM »
I don't have numbers at hand, but if you had trouble with a poorly designed metal one, why not change the quality of the design rather than the material?  Poor design is poor design and will screw you up no matter what; Good design should take the material into account.

CF is, pound for pound, stronger than steel.  But it's very likely not so inch for inch.  A good 5/32" music wire should hold things just fine.

I pull test my floating bellcranks and their supports by hanging about two or three times the expected pull of a pull test from them, while they're sitting in a shop vise.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Avaiojet

  • 22 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 7468
  • Just here for the fun of it also.
Re: Floating Bellcrank
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2018, 03:32:03 PM »
This has some posibilities.  Love the way it transfers the load to the spars, hence the whole wing and the braces pretty much guarantee you are not going to bend the axel on a pull test. The only thing I question is why doesn't the axel extend through the spar cap?  In one of those situations (that only happens to other people) where you lose tension and have to pray the bellcrank holds when it hits the lines on the other side, you are going to get the full initial force on either the up or down line.  If the axel extends through the spar and is in some way attached to the fuselage you have more than just the glue joint between you and a rebuilding session.  That would be my only change.

Ken

Ken,

Most of my axels do extend beyond the spar, in fact just above the sheeting a bit top and bottom.

I then Epoxy a piece of 1/16" ply over the axel and the ply is snug against the inner fuselage sides.

I solder a washer on the top and the bottom.

I believe I have photos in my builds of this.
Trump Derangement Syndrome. TDS. 
Avaiojet Derangement Syndrome. ADS.
Amazing how ignorance can get in the way of the learning process.
If you're Trolled, you know you're doing something right.  Alpha Mike Foxtrot. "No one has ever made a difference by being like everyone else."  Marcus Cordeiro, The "Mark of Excellence," you will not be forgotten. "No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot."- Mark Twain. I look at the Forum as a place to contribute and make friends, some view it as a Realm where they could be King.   Proverb 11.9  "With his mouth the Godless destroys his neighbor..."  "Perhaps the greatest challenge in modeling is to build a competitive control line stunter that looks like a real airplane." David McCellan, 1980.

Online Ken Culbertson

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6036
Re: Floating Bellcrank
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2018, 05:51:27 PM »
I don't have numbers at hand, but if you had trouble with a poorly designed metal one, why not change the quality of the design rather than the material?  Poor design is poor design and will screw you up no matter what; Good design should take the material into account.

CF is, pound for pound, stronger than steel.  But it's very likely not so inch for inch.  A good 5/32" music wire should hold things just fine.

I pull test my floating bellcranks and their supports by hanging about two or three times the expected pull of a pull test from them, while they're sitting in a shop vise.

I suppose you are right about the metal vs. CF but I am stuck with 1/8 unless I want to rebush one of Tom Morris's bellcranks.  It was a poor design by today's standards.
AMA 15382
If it is not broke you are not trying hard enough.
USAF 1968-1974 TAC


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here