stunthanger.com
Design => Stunt design => Topic started by: Air Ministry . on January 06, 2016, 08:57:41 PM
-
(http://discaircraft.greyfalcon.us/picturest/rich.gif)
Ive got a aeromodellor or RCM&E plan for one of these , reputed to fly well . Could be Just the Thing for Combat . . . or F2B . ;D
(http://lowres-picturecabinet.com.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/43/main/64/1106760.jpg)
apparently he had to modify the tail though . S?P Likely wouldnt need the rigging wires . LL~ Fearfully Modern ! its got a TRIKE undecarriage
The plans about 48 in span / dia. I think , and pretty simple . Radial ribs thatd need reworking to symetrical to try stunt .
Ive to much to do to try it at present , but theres a few other strange Mac Hines I will put on . Here .
Have to be reasonably practicable , if youd like to add any. Thanks .
(http://aviadejavu.ru/Images6/MY/MY76-10/14-7.jpg)
http://aviadejavu.ru/Site/Crafts/Craft32576.htm
-
Lee-Richards annular plane, 1913-1914. Flew well and had good performance for their time. Unfortunately, there was a war, and conventional planes were developed fast. These planes were well engineered and developed in a series. Test results printed in "Flight", 4/10/24. 'some of my favorite planes.
-
1924 ! :o
Youd be well over 90 then . :##
S?P ;D n1
Id better drag out the tandem wing sucker & post it here . My theorys anything over 30 % or 1/3 wing area Aft . is Tandem wing . %^@ VD~
H^^
Be intresting to see how that Donut works , aerobatically .
-
You can think of it as a joined-wing tandem. The Warren-Young planes of a couple decades later were more straight-winged, but swept. I think all of these annulars and otherwise joined-wing tandems are a bit more "stable" - i.e. they'll take a bit more effort to pitch.
-
Send you the plan & mag , if you want it . Radio Models or somesuch , cover queen .
youre probably wright , as theres wings everywhere there , Thisis the Tandem Turkey I was on about though .
If ' someone ' ^-^ wanted to do a pisstake on the wee tailplane sods , a semi scale whowever you pronounce it , would be pretty simple to knock together .
Seems its back in flight , about the time of the Ark , too . https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1936/1936%20-%202533.html
(http://www.homebuiltairplanes.com/forums/attachments/aircraft-design-aerodynamics-new-technology/30294d1391943553-tandem-wing-control-arrangement-mauboussin-m40-hemiptere-article-soruce-unknown-circa-1936.jpg)
(http://www.homebuiltairplanes.com/forums/attachments/aircraft-design-aerodynamics-new-technology/30291d1391943553-tandem-wing-control-arrangement-mauboussin-m40-hemiptere-factory-brochure-p1.jpg)
Just had to remember the name & figure how to spwel it . Google Pics gets the Info.
(http://i66.servimg.com/u/f66/10/06/04/48/img30710.jpg)
Another One for the Intrepid Birdman .
-
Here it is in Vivid Tecnocolour , for your appreciation .
(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-TZ1r2wAtlLw/VH8Uf3r6HUI/AAAAAAAAEWY/PQ28iMDexHo/s800/IMG_20141130_174535.jpg)
(http://www.homebuiltairplanes.com/forums/attachments/general-experimental-aviation-questions/32799d1403557279-reverse-engineering-mauboussin-m-40-hemiptere-1953.jpg)
-
Third of my ' how peculiar ' - that looks like it'd work ' subjects .The Floh . VD~
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGvausHWcAEv7TU.jpg)
(http://www.hobbysta.eu/images/pelny/CMK/data/117/0135183f22.jpg)
(http://www.airwar.ru/image/idop/fww1/t28/t28-3.jpg)
(http://www.outerzone.co.uk/images/thumbs/plans/4030.jpg)
from outerzone .
(http://www.the-blueprints.com/blueprints-depot-restricted/modernplanes/modern-d/dfw_t28_floh-21314.jpg)
(http://members.jcom.home.ne.jp/mig_exp/dfw-t-28-floh.jpg)
Maybe they thought the poms would die laughing ? :-\
photo of a model with flat wings , why bother with the diheadral . Maye stiff 1/32 balsa 2 ply for the fuse - sides ??
Save on centersection struts , anyway . Good for a four foot span hack ?