News:


  • June 08, 2024, 03:32:58 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Solid wing perky  (Read 1413 times)

Jim Roselle

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Solid wing perky
« on: April 02, 2014, 07:30:23 AM »
Hello all,

Starting my next project in a week or so. I have blackhawk perky kit; I plan on on replacing the built up wing with a solid one. This is all new to me. What thickness / weight of balsa wood should be used for the wing? Should I use basswood?

Thanks,
Jim

Offline bob whitney

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2249
Re: Solid wing perky
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2014, 09:05:30 AM »
the built up wing works , so anything stronger then that will work. good solid balsa.   bass would be much heavier and not necessary.  standing start so keep it lite
rad racer

James_Mynes

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Solid wing perky
« Reply #2 on: April 07, 2014, 11:29:00 AM »
On the Perky I'm building I found clearance problems between the wing and bellcrank. My bellcrank platform sits on the fuselage crutches as shown on the plan, with insufficient room under the wing for a bellcrank and pushrod. I solved this by not sheeting the center area, and extending the sheeting on top of the wing out one rib on each side, using 1/16 ply. I also sheeted the bottom with 1/16 ply out to the same rib, but with the center open.
I'm no engineer, but it seems strong enough. If I ever build another one, the bellcrank mount will be lower.
In your case, using a solid plank wing, hollowing out the center might not be a good idea.
The kit leaves much to the imagination, but the end result is that your Perky will be unique.

Offline Paul Smith

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 5817
Re: Solid wing perky
« Reply #3 on: April 07, 2014, 01:44:31 PM »
The original Perky plan also left a lot to the imagination, including the entire control system.  I believe some of the early kits omitted the entire control system to avoid royalties to and/or lawsuits from Jim Walker vis a vis his patented bellcrank system.

On the plus side, it shows exactly where to put the condenser and battery pack.

I built mine with a top & bottom like a pan rat and just hung the bellcrank on the bottom of the wing.  No need for cutting into and thus weakening the wing.
Paul Smith

Offline kenneth cook

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1472
Re: Solid wing perky
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2014, 03:38:26 AM »
              Hello Paul, could you show some of us some close up pics of your tank for the Perky. You showed my son and I at Brodak's a few years back. I would like any details you could offer. Ken

Offline Paul Smith

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 5817
Re: Solid wing perky
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2014, 06:24:31 AM »
My latest tank is basically just a cube that fits in neatly.  The left side is contoured to act as part of the fuselage.  This was necessary because other size the left side would have been paper-thin.

This picture isn't the latest revision.  At this stage I was still able to get it all indoors.  I need to take a picture of the latest rev.

I have taken to making tanks with the mounting flange part of the tank bottom.  The tank shown in the second picture proved to be too small for the Nelson when run in the go fast mode.  It was OK when choked down to fly for average.

I find very handy to build this plane like a pan rat.  The main bolt runs through a tube through the bellcrank.
Paul Smith

Offline kenneth cook

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1472
Re: Solid wing perky
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2014, 03:15:36 PM »
             Paul, thanks for taking the pictures it's much appreciated. Ken


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here