News:



  • April 30, 2024, 10:55:21 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: 21 Proto Design  (Read 4110 times)

Online Motorman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 3264
21 Proto Design
« on: December 23, 2014, 09:36:23 PM »
How thick do you need to make the wing on a 21 proto? If I remember on my 21 speed there was just enough room for a 1/4" wing between the tank and the mini pipe. I thought a bigger wing would need to be 3/8" so, I'm wondering what is usually done.

Thanks,
MM
« Last Edit: December 24, 2014, 01:03:26 PM by Motorman »

Online Motorman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 3264
Re: 21 Proto Design
« Reply #1 on: December 26, 2014, 05:54:36 PM »
Need to make a top for this.


Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22774
Re: 21 Proto Design
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2014, 11:47:31 AM »
Do a search for Tom Wilk.  Then PM him as he has cd's for speed planes showing the plans.   Might go on the NASS(North America Speed Society) and check them out.
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Steve Helmick

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 9950
Re: 21 Proto Design
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2015, 06:37:19 PM »
Mine is still a glued-up blank, custom sawed, .338" thick at the center. I think we were looking at 5/16" finished. The plane was mostly designed by Tom Knoppi. It's got 1/64 or 1/32 plywood edges, and a fair amount of taper, and was going to be covered with .6 oz FG and epoxy. The block of balsa we sawed up was right around 6 lb density. We intended to use K&B .21 ABC Ducted Fan engines (rear intake). Then Tom had his car wreck. The plans got lost, along with a lot of enthusiasm.  :'(  Steve
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

Offline Bob Heywood

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 999
Re: 21 Proto Design
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2015, 03:38:14 PM »
Carl China's Viper II wing was just thick enough to hold the control unit, barely 1/4".
"Clockwise Forever..."

Online Motorman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 3264
Re: 21 Proto Design
« Reply #5 on: February 02, 2015, 01:22:32 PM »
Must have been basswood.

Offline Bob Heywood

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 999
Re: 21 Proto Design
« Reply #6 on: February 02, 2015, 06:43:47 PM »
Must have been basswood.

According to the construction plan the wing has a 1/4 h x 1/8 w bass spar. The balance is balsa. Harry Roe built his pretty much the same way. In his article Carl specified the fabricated wing w/ Monoline unit @ 3.5 oz. This did not include the finish. These planes were very light.
"Clockwise Forever..."

Online Motorman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 3264
Re: 21 Proto Design
« Reply #7 on: February 02, 2015, 09:23:45 PM »
Ok but, the reason I'm asking the question is because I've seen wings that were built too light. When they get up to speed the tips flex up and put on the brakes.

MM

Offline Bob Heywood

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 999
Re: 21 Proto Design
« Reply #8 on: February 03, 2015, 06:41:53 AM »
Ok but, the reason I'm asking the question is because I've seen wings that were built too light. When they get up to speed the tips flex up and put on the brakes.

MM

Viper II was designed to the class minimum 24" span. The root chord is 7.25" and the tip chord is 3.25". The quarter chord line has no sweep. The resulting aspect ratio is 4.48. I launched for both Carl & Harry and was around for a lot of their test activity. I don't recall that the wing gave any problems.

I could see though that a higher aspect ratio wing might need more thickness, especially if the plane was a bit on the heavy side.

P.S. You might want to look at Jimmy Delany's and Tom Lauerman's Emanon. They held the B Proto record when the class was retired. It was certainly no slouch.
"Clockwise Forever..."


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here