News:

 

CLICK HERE--><--CLICK HERE

Shy Fox Mk II

Started by Balsa Butcher, May 04, 2018, 11:41:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Balsa Butcher

Just a few shots of the latest project to come out of the Butcher Shop...or what stunt builders build when they  are not building stunt planes. The Shy Fox MkII is a MkI with a lower aspect wing. Both were designed by Dave Hull. It has not flown yet but will be soon. Power is an Enya 25 SS, ABC. For comparison I enclosed a shot of the MkI and Mk II side by side. Plans for the original MkI version can still be ordered from Model Aviation magazine.
Pete Cunha
Sacramento CA.
AMA 57499

C.T. Schaefer

Very nicely done!  What sort of racing will it be for?   TS

Balsa Butcher

Sorry, Super Slow Rat per NCLRA rules. 
Pete Cunha
Sacramento CA.
AMA 57499

bill bischoff

She's a beauty, Pete. Hope she's almost as fast as a Mockingbird.  >:D

Bill Bischoff

Dave Hull

I got a close up look at both when Pete came down for the Bob Palmer Stunt Contest. He's raced the Mk I with us before, but the Mk II is right off the assembly table and it looks really good. We had hoped to get some flights in after the stunt rounds were completed but didn't quite make it. Hope you get it in the air soon Pete and work out any bugs.

My own Mk II just had the outboard wing rebuilt after the overly aggressive pilot person put it into the pits at warp speed. Even when the pitman has soft hands, there is a limit to what the leading edge can take!

Balsa Butcher

Wingspan of the MkI (mine at least) is 38". If the tail moment looks a bit long in the picture, it is. I extended it by 1". If I were to do it over again I would build it according to plans. The extra length is not needed.  The Mk MkII plane is built per Dave's numbers  except for a slight change in wingtip shape due to having a couple of leftover wingtips in the scrap bin that needed to be to used.  8)
Pete Cunha
Sacramento CA.
AMA 57499

Dave Hull

No plowing on either one of these, Motorman. They have plenty of span. I have flown "floppers" as a rent-a-pilot before and didn't like them at all. The induced drag goes thru the roof at the top of the racing zone and they slow down. If you bring a pig to that party, your pilot needs to be a good whipper. The reason each of the proud owners touted for the super low A/R was the low form drag from the reduced frontal area and that they shake down impressively. Both those claims are nebulous. If you want to win, you have to be able to pass without slowing down, or you need "liberal" officiating and a strong pilot. And if the pig stalls on the first shake and does not reestablish flow and flying before it hits the ground (in other words, it is a flopper) you basically get close to the pit and crash there and hope it is in reach of the pitman and nothing important broke off. Liberal officiating helps here too. And if you have staked your design cred on such a design, you build it stronger and heavier each year to keep it from breaking during successive flops. So now it slows down even more at the top. True race plane de-evolution!

Ok. I'm not a fan of super low A/R racing planes. It does get the wing out of the way of the pitman which is the only redeeming value I have found. This was pointed out to me after too many beers at Muncie—by a pitman....

If it helps anyone, the wingspan on the Mk II is 34 inches. The area and thickness are unchanged. It also used the stock stabilizer size. The rest is unchanged. I prefer the Mk II because it is easier for the pitman and it flies just as good.

McSlow

PS—Tell us about your 24" slow rat, Motorman

George Grossardt

So where can one get plans to the mark 2 version?

bob whitney

rad racer

bill bischoff

It's never too late to learn a new skill, Bob.  n~

Dave Hull

George,

The ShyFox plans are available from the AMA. You can go into the Members Only section and see them in the archives, including a very complete build article in the March 2010 magazine. The Mk II differs only in the wing planform. There are no released plans for the Mk II, just two sketches that I made and gave to a few guys that were interested. The root chord is 10-1/4" and the tip chord is 9-1/4". The wing LE is moved 1/2" forward in this version to maintain the  balance. Neither of my planes required nose/tail weight. I tend to use firm wood in the fuse and tail. Spar construction is the same, just a bit shorter. Just make up some root and tip templates per the sketch and stack-sand your rib set.

Again, in the interest of full disclosure, I didn't follow the plans when I built the Mk I stab and elevators. Kind of like Pete and his wingtips, the piece of wood I had was a bit bigger than the plans so I used it. The plans actually show both, so take your pick. The Mk II used the smaller stab. No difference in the way the two fly, really.

For anyone who has not tried the exact sewn hinges shown in the plans, you should. They are really bulletproof when combined with the spruce spars. They work equally well on basswood surfaces that I use for Goodyear, Mouse, Rat, and Quickie Rat tails. The problem I have when I tell people about sewn hinges is that they remember carpet thread and a million stitches along the length of the surfaces. (Like Frankenstein's sutures.) This is unnecessary with modern materials, draggy, takes more time to do, and is butt-ugly. The second issue is that guys all fondly remember the "best" material to use. I try not to get involved in these conversations any more. People do what they know--even if it has long since been improved. When a guy tells me how great 1/2A Dacron flying lines work but won't try Spectra, the receive channel just isn't turned on. Or dental floss. Or carpet thread. Or, the super techie dude,  who has got to use Kevlar thread. Sure Kevlar is strong, but for a sewn hinge, it is harder to work with and you need some pretty small stuff. If you have a 100 year supply of Soviet Kevlar that you need to use up, go for it!

Well, I guess if Rad doesn't do beer, he must not have been the pitman in question. Or else I drank too many and can't tell the story right! Bob did a great job pitting the heat races at the Nats that year. Most races are won in the pits, so try not to hand a rent-a-pitman a plane with some unusual trick setup. If the teams have to split up for the final, that pitman may only get 5 minutes to figure out your setup. Less if he has to go fill up the refueling bottle. Most pitmen are very familiar with the setup shown in the ShyFox plans. This plane has probably been pitted by all of them!

McSlow


George Grossardt

Dave,

Thanks for sharing the info.  I appreciate it.

George

john e. holliday

So true about pitmen.  When Melvin and I were flying together  in the Shoestring event I would tell to set the prop to his satisfaction when he pitted my plane.  Other than mouse it was only event I would fly because of rules at the time.   Guess I will have to pull out plans of the Sly Fox. D>K
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Charles Cline

Has anyone built a straight wing version of the Shyfox?

Dave Hull

Not to my knowledge, Charles--you could be the first!

Be sure the wing meets the rules for area (300 sq. in.) and minimum thickness (1") and have at it.

If making the ribs for the tapered wing is troubling you, I can say that I stack-sanded a full set using a couple of templates and it is pretty simple. The hardest part for me was going thru the junk drawer looking for some long 4-40 bolts to clamp the stack. But there is no reason you couldn't use some 6-32 or larger hardware store bolts.

Dave "McSlow"

Paul Smith

For stack-sanding the "bolts" are DuBro 4/40 threaded rods.  You can stack as high as you want.  I typically do two planes at time. 

I always do one-sided templates and flip them.

Also, the blanks are held in alignment with a little bit of clear dope that can easily dissolved.
Paul Smith

Motorman

#16
If you have the rib drawings you can just cut out the ribs and sand each one smooth. It's not like you're making a stunt ship.

MM :)
Wasted words ain't never been heard. Alman Brothers

Charles Cline

I am going to see if I can get a gentleman to laser cut me a couple sets. I really like the bird. I am going to give SSR a shot. I have been pestering Bill Bischoff for help with some of the stuff he offers. Does a really nice job. My local club (North Coast Control Liners) is dipping our toes into Flying Clown racing this season. I will see if I can get some interest in SSR. I will see if I can pick McSlows brain a little on building thoughts. 

Dave Hull

Slim Pickin's there, Charles!

Have you read the Model Aviation article? I tried to include a lot of info, and they published it pretty much as written. But if you have specific questions or need more photos, then just ask about it here.

The Divot McSlow

Charles Cline

Dave, I sent you an email. I will be looking to start building in April. I am going out of country for a short time, but will start when I get back, Also a sport Goodyear.

Dave Hull

Charles,

No email yet...?  But I'm not sure how to find private messages on the "new look" board. Maybe that is where you went?

Dave

Charles Cline

I asked Bill if he had your email. After some arm twisting he gave it to me (don't blame bill for that). I downloaded your Mk II drawings. I am having trouble finding the CF strips for the LE. I may punt on that and use some tow?

Dave Hull

Charles,

CST Composites lists the .007x.250x36 carbon laminate as CL-1033. You can reach out to them and see if it is in stock. They are in Tehachapi CA, not the one in Aussieland.

The tow would work. Some uni-tape would also be very good. It's essentially tow that is already spread and laid out flat. That makes the joinery of the parts easier since the carbon is sandwiched in the middle and having the carbon a controlled thickness makes things easier.

Truth be told, the wing is strong enough in bending using the spruce wing spars without the carbon inner reinforcement. The leading edge carbon is there to try to minimize damage from rough handling during a race. It helps, but a bigger, harder balsa LE would accomplish much the same thing. But then you can't tell everybody how much carbon reinforcement is in your plane and how cool that is. Of course, it might be a lot cooler to have the $30-$40 bucks in your pocket instead, but....

The products in the parts list were readily available at the time. Like much of the "build it yourself" part of the hobby, that has changed in recent years.

Charles Cline

Thank you Dave. I go by "Chuck". I will check with CST. I appreciate the insight on harder balsa might be enough, especially with the Mk. II wing modification. I am intending to use a shut off as well. That might minimize harsh handling by a pit crew. If that is not allowed in the rules, I will adapt. I will look into having the aluminum front end fabricated as well. I really like the design elements of the SF plans!

Dave Hull

Chuck,

I just sawed, filed and drilled the engine mounts on my two planes. I used the aluminum plate sold at the hobby shop from K&S. It has good strength and temper. I do the same with all the Quickie Rats and other racers....


Advertise Here