News:



  • June 17, 2025, 04:37:10 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: 777 Engine Failure  (Read 4236 times)

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12894
777 Engine Failure
« on: September 10, 2015, 10:36:32 AM »
Wowzers.  I usually like a window seat overlooking an engine -- I guess I would have gotten to participate in some drama had I been on this flight!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3228323/Dramatic-new-images-British-Airways-jet-caught-fire-Vegas-engine-EXPLODED-spraying-cabin-pieces-burning-shrapnel.html
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline REX1945

  • AMA 19945
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 145
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2015, 10:45:47 AM »
I like to sit over the wing because it is the smoothest ride in the house.

Rex

Offline john ohnimus

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 235
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2015, 11:14:58 AM »
I like to sit over the wing because I'm a licensed Airframe and Powerplant mechanic and I know how to work the escape hatch.... That seat row also has more legroom :-))
Hard Tellin'....  Not Knowin'

AMA 413710

Offline FLOYD CARTER

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4503
    • owner
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2015, 12:13:19 PM »
I always try for a window seat.  I tell the attendant that the pilot can't find his way without my help.
Floyd
91 years, but still going
AMA #796  SAM #188  LSF #020

Offline Steve Fitton

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2278
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2015, 03:20:16 PM »
I thought uncontained engine failures were not supposed to happen anymore.
Steve

Offline Steve Helmick

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10265
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2015, 04:10:32 PM »
My guess is that Pete Ferguson had to go to Los Vegas immediately. I hope he got to Florida (driving) in time to catch his flight back out West.  D>K Steve 
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

Offline john ohnimus

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 235
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #6 on: September 10, 2015, 04:26:00 PM »
Most of the stuff you see on engine failures deal with fan blade (C-1 disk) separation. The videos that circulate usually show the blade separate and then be contained by the fan frame. However when a turbine wheel fails it sometimes will exit the case. It is located near the aft end of the engine. This unit is spinning quite fast and at take off power settings it surely will exit. American had a 767 with CF6's on it dam near burned LAX down. The turbine wheel exited #1 and skipped across the bottom of the plane and stuck into #2 engine. Other parts ruptured the fuel tanks huge fire ball etc...
Hard Tellin'....  Not Knowin'

AMA 413710

Offline Bill Johnson

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 540
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #7 on: September 10, 2015, 08:42:38 PM »
Most of the stuff you see on engine failures deal with fan blade (C-1 disk) separation. The videos that circulate usually show the blade separate and then be contained by the fan frame. However when a turbine wheel fails it sometimes will exit the case. It is located near the aft end of the engine. This unit is spinning quite fast and at take off power settings it surely will exit. American had a 767 with CF6's on it dam near burned LAX down. The turbine wheel exited #1 and skipped across the bottom of the plane and stuck into #2 engine. Other parts ruptured the fuel tanks huge fire ball etc...

That was a bad one.

Turbine failures are much more difficult to contain then the compressor/fan. 2/3rds of the energy produced by the engine is extracted by the turbines just to spin the compressor.

RR Trents have an issue with the intermediate turbine which turns the mid-speed compressor. It sometimes shifts aft contacting the next turbine nozzle. This is a little more difficult to design then single or 2-spool engines. Each shaft, in this case 3 of them, must have at least one set of thrust and radial bearings. If the turbine shifts aft and the mid-speed spool seizes, the bearing support housing can rupture leading to an oil fire.  Meanwhile, the low and high speed spools are still spinning full speed.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2015, 04:53:35 AM by Bill Johnson »
Best Regards,
Bill

AMA 350715

Offline john ohnimus

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 235
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #8 on: September 11, 2015, 04:54:30 AM »
Bill,

  We dont see too many RR engines here. Mostly GE's and Pratt's. Which maintenance facility do you work at?

Tony O.
Hard Tellin'....  Not Knowin'

AMA 413710

Offline Bill Johnson

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 540
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #9 on: September 11, 2015, 06:33:55 AM »
Tony,
I'm in an office in Huntsville now but have worked in facilities all over the country. Now I have quality and AS9100/9110 oversight on 24 programs in 15 countries. Lots of travel, little time on the flightline for the last 2 years. Even less time to fly C/L, much less build anything. Fortunately, I have friends with plenty of hand-me-downs and used planes for sale.  H^^
Best Regards,
Bill

AMA 350715

Offline Scott Richlen

  • AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2156
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #10 on: September 11, 2015, 06:46:07 AM »
What is amazing is the high level of design/maintenance of these airplanes resulting in their safety.  Thus, why this particular failure is so noticeable.  Years ago we were funding R&D on CFCCs (continuous fiber ceramic composites) for use in turbines.  Not sure where that is now.  Maybe the economics didn't work.

Offline john ohnimus

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 235
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #11 on: September 11, 2015, 10:57:56 AM »
If a blade at the front of the engine fails, the casing is designed to retain it. The NTSB's findings therefore suggest that the failure was within the internal part of the engine.

"Initial examination of the left engine revealed multiple breaches of the engine case in the area around the high pressure compressor," the NTSB said in a statement.
Hard Tellin'....  Not Knowin'

AMA 413710

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12894
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2015, 11:35:55 AM »
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline Bill Johnson

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 540
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #13 on: September 11, 2015, 12:30:24 PM »
Here's what the NTSB said yesterday: http://www.ntsb.gov/news/press-releases/Pages/PR20150910.aspx.

So BA has some 777s with GE90s! That's interesting. I thought they were RR throughout the fleet.
Best Regards,
Bill

AMA 350715

Offline john ohnimus

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 235
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #14 on: September 11, 2015, 06:08:08 PM »
Bill,

Ever work at TIMCO (now HAECO) in GSO?  I've been off of the "floor" now for two years. Work in tech training. Indoc, Human Factors, I teach a couple of GenFams. Just finished my systems and engine run on the B777 with GE90's. Spent the last 8 years as an A&P lead. Good Times...

Tony O
Hard Tellin'....  Not Knowin'

AMA 413710

Offline Bill Johnson

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 540
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #15 on: September 11, 2015, 08:25:38 PM »
I did, John, back in 1992 and 3. I was working heavy structures then. The typical Boeing and Douglas airplanes. In fact, I was there when Piedmont was started back up.
Best Regards,
Bill

AMA 350715

Offline john ohnimus

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 235
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #16 on: September 11, 2015, 09:05:37 PM »
I'll ask around and see if anyone remembers you. I know a lot of folks there been there since. 99'
Hard Tellin'....  Not Knowin'

AMA 413710

Offline Peter Ferguson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 369
Re: 777 Engine Failure
« Reply #17 on: September 13, 2015, 03:05:56 PM »
It may surprise a fw people to learn that the BA 777 fleet has GE engines not RR. This was a decision made around the launch of the program. To get the order GE bought the BA facility in Preswick Scotland (formally British Caledonia airlines). That is now the OH facility for GE 90"s and is probably where this engine will go for teardown and investigation. Most of the engine non contained failures from the compressors originate with inclusions in the castings. It will be interesting to see if this is something different.
Peter Ferguson
Auburn, WA

Tags: