Bill is correct in regards to the 7.8x6. This prop is not out of the question to use on a MK VI. This prop though has underwent some blade changes over the past few years and the newer is thinner bladed which I don't care for. I was using a 8x8 APC when my prop blade let go. I took a picture and sent it to APC. They informed me that prop I was using was rated for the rpm's but they have no way of monitoring prop useage. Therefore, they mentioned a few factors can contribute to blade failure which they can't control such as transporting, ground strikes and even starting with a chicken stick. I don't use a chicken stick, my prop never hit the ground at anytime and it wasn't damaged in transport. They also mentioned inspecting the prop for stress fractures which initially show up as white striations which can form at the tips and prop to hub intersection.
Indeed . Had a blade fly off a Winsor 3 Bl 12 x 6 a few months back . At least the wings are still o.k. . The rest didnt fare to well . Was loading up in a bit of wind . Was totally unexpected .
A wind up was a silk coverd spruce capped I Beam wing , over your knee . The Tips will go a few inches up and down , In their ' Working Range ' of load bearing . THE POINT BEING
IF you grab the blades firmly and carefully , you can ' test ' the resilance , ant a reasonable estimation of ' working load ' Which is a lot higher in big bumps on a stunt machine going hard .
IF theres a flaw , its fairly evident . Test a few ' discard ' junk props , to get a feel for it / them . But many components can do with a ' non distructive ' test . IF it ' destructs ' them ,
they were obviously flawed . SOMEHOW .
There has been known to be sabotage .
We wont coment on that . OBVIOUSLY .