Brett, did RC duffers hold you down and make you eat a bug or something?

I don't think many of us are harboring fantasies of thousands of CL Stunt flying youngsters
crowding every flying site. We'd just like to see some new blood (true blood?) entering the
hobby.
We may indeed have more fliers than 30 years ago, but wasn't it in the 1970s that Stunt
nearly died off? When PAMPA got started, wasn't CL Stunt interest and participation
pretty constrained, maybe minimal?
As much as I love all you guys, I know that we are primarily Old Farts, with limited time left.
How many of us will be around in 20 years? Who will be flying CL in 20 years (don't answer
that Brett, you're still a young man by CL Stunt standards)? How's our Nats CL participation
numbers nowadays? Spot any trends? Any POSITIVE trends?
I'm always delighted to see younger folks getting seriously into CL. Some important evolutionary
changes (say, electric power) may depend on it. Few of the older, established fliers are interested
in changes. It's only natural - I'm not criticizing, I just acknowledge how we are as human beings.
For all our scorn of RC and its "duffers", that large market has generated demand enough to make some
significant leaps in the technology, and at least some of what we find as new technology is simply applied
from the world of RC. By comparison to the RC market, the CL market is miniscule. A larger CL market
would be a Good Thing for our hobby.
Remember too that only a minor subset of CL flyers are ever serious competitors. And for those who enter
the hobby and would be groomed for competition, some workable path has to exist. Similar comments for
even entering the "sport flyer" category.
L.
"Keith Richards, 61, wears a tattered scarf around his head, and random charms - an eagle head, a cross, a Chinese coin - hanging from his matted quasi-dreads. He says he has no idea what-all is in his hair: his kids and friends like to decorate him while he's passed out." -August 15, 2005 issue of Newsweek magazine.