stunthanger.com

General control line discussion => Open Forum => Topic started by: Ryan Taylor on January 03, 2007, 06:17:29 PM

Title: Veco 19 v.s. Fox 35
Post by: Ryan Taylor on January 03, 2007, 06:17:29 PM

Just a quick question, I am thinking about switching the engines on my flight streak, and I was wondering what is more fuel efficient? The Veco 19 or the Fox 35?
   
Thanks,

Prop Buster

Title: Re: Veco 19 v.s. Fox 35
Post by: peabody on January 03, 2007, 06:23:50 PM

I believe that the Veco is a great choice for the plane....

Title: Re: Veco 19 v.s. Fox 35
Post by: Marvin Denny on January 03, 2007, 06:45:10 PM

  The Veco 19 will be more fuel efficient, but may be a little wimpy for the Streak. That is unless the streak is pretty light.

  Bigiron

Title: Re: Veco 19 v.s. Fox 35
Post by: peabody on January 03, 2007, 07:18:17 PM

Marv....
Help me out here...
Is the Flite Streak ARF the same as the kitted version that we all know and love?
I fly my ARF with a Norvel 15 and it works okay, though not a 100 mph deal like you are fond of....
Thanks

Title: Re: Veco 19 v.s. Fox 35
Post by: Steve Holt on January 03, 2007, 08:13:40 PM

What model is your Veco 19?  The ball bearing series is a great engine and has lots of power for the ARF Streak.  It should do the pattern easily on 3 oz.

The ARF Streak is similar to the kit, but has a longer tail moment.  It is light and flys very well.  Much better covering than the Brodak ARF's but the bellcrank is not as good.
Steve

Title: Re: Veco 19 v.s. Fox 35
Post by: Russell Shaffer on January 03, 2007, 08:34:29 PM

How do you think a 70's Fox 19 would do on a Streak?  It runs very well, but I don't have any way to compare it to newer stuff.  Thanks.

Title: Re: Veco 19 v.s. Fox 35
Post by: Chris Brainard on January 03, 2007, 11:54:36 PM

My 30 oz. Fancy Pants has been flown with a Brodak .40, O.S. Max .35 S, O.S. .25 FP, O.S. .25 LA and Veco .19 B.B. I like it with the Veco the best. One advantage of using the Veco .19 instead of a Fox .35 on the Flite Streak is that you can use .012" diameter lines. This proved to be a big advantage on my Fancy Pants. My experience with fairly lightweight models, is that the weight of .015" diameter lines really hurts their performance, even with a bigger engine. I was able to reduce tip weight with the smaller diameter lines and the reduced drag of the lines reduced yawing which improved the square maneuvers.
Chris

Title: Re: Veco 19 v.s. Fox 35
Post by: Bill Little on January 03, 2007, 11:57:02 PM

Hi Paul,

If it is the BB Veco 19, and it's in good shape, it is more than enough for the Flite Streak.  y1

Bill <><

Title: Re: Veco 19 v.s. Fox 35
Post by: Harleyman on January 04, 2007, 08:47:58 PM

Ryan,

The Veco 19 will be more fuel efficient.

I fly my ARF Streak with an Enya 19 that really hauls it around without a muffler. I know nothing about a Veco 19 but if it's anything like the Enya, it should do fine without the muffler (extra weight).  I fly my Enya in a nice wet two cycle.
Is the P&L all steel construction? My old Enya is, so if the Veco is the same, make sure you use the same type of fuel you'd run in a Fox 35.
My guess is, it should work well with your ARF Streak, because it is pretty light.

 o2oP