Sometimes, one comes across a design that catches one's interest. It may or may not be practical, popular or truly stunt worthy, even though it may allege to be. I was impressed with the looks of this aircraft and have always wanted to build one. After about 8 years, I finally found it, bought it for a song on E-Bay. This is the 1960 Berkeley Interceptor 35. It says on the box that it is a combat plane.
Feedback I have received so far from those familiar with it is that it was not all that impressive. Berkeley's owner/manager at the time decided rather than to put some quality into its kits and increase the price to cover, kept things cheap, which discouraged modelers from purchasing their kits. Duke Fox found out the hard way that purchasing Berkeley was a losing proposition. Sig finally wound up with the inventory, retained some of the scale free flight cabin kits as their Craftsman Series until liquidating them and the remaining Berkeley plans in the early 1990's.
A couple days ago, it finally arrived. I opened the box, and the following is what I observed:
- Fuselage is oddly laid out with a 3/8" thick red oak nose portion to mid section of wing.
- Rear is standard 3/8" thick sheet balsa.
- Has a single landing gear like the Sig Skyray.
- Bellcrank is 1/32" thick aluminum, unsuitable.
- Wing "D" box portion penetrates fuselage, trailing edge butts against it.
- No plans, only assembly instructions.
- Wing profile and moments are similar to the Ringmaster S-1 with about 400 square inches wing area.
- Standard Berkeley quality die cutting and shaping, a little rough by today's standards.
My first step will be to get some 11"x17" quadrille paper and sketch out a set of full sized plans from which to build, trace wing ribs and other parts. I will use portions of the kit wood, but replace the fuselage with a standard balsa one with plywood cheek doublers and maple motor mounts like most other profiles. Power will most likely be one of my Testors .35 Red Heads.
Part of my posting was to express my excitement in this find. The other part was out of curiosity, what others may know about this kit and its history, any experiences in building and flying it, use in competition (formal or with friends), and etc.