Ball links have less play. Slop in the control system is counterproductive, although some use it to tune out hunting issues at neutral. Also ball links have a larger bearing surface. Golden rods will, over time, wear out the nylon hole. More slop. Of course that's hundreds of flights. Ball links don't do that. Actually, these days, I've been using doubled nylon horns on profiles, the ball link sandwiched. Did it on my last modded Twister. Doing it on a current Magician. Allen Brickhaus said do it, so I did it. About a half an hour ago I looked over those horns testing this and that, man they sure do twist around. Doubled horns reduce slop due to torquing. I even went to a ball link on the bellcrank inside the Magician wing. Better clearance, no worry about a cold solder joint. The Ball also allows the angle from the crank to the flap horn to change geometrically. Dunno. Am I the only one getting compulsive about what used to seem like trivial issues. I plan a quick build Brodak Streak. Want to see if I can do most of it in a day or two or three. I've spent weeks (doing other things as well of course) deciding whether or not to use the fues that came with the kit. The genuine Midwest quality short fues stick weighs 2.8 ounces. Some mighty old fashioned iron wood. I've got full sheets of 36"x1/2"x3" that way a tad more than 2.4 ounces. Obviously I can re-cut the stock fues and loose over an ounce. IT'S A BRODAK STREAK for crying out loud. Why am I thinking about this. Because the LIGHTER STUFF FLIES BETTER, usually, sometimes...