News:



  • June 16, 2025, 03:24:08 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Stupidist Trainer ?  (Read 4523 times)

Offline M Spencer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 5238
Stupidist Trainer ?
« on: December 05, 2015, 06:57:45 PM »
http://www.outerzone.co.uk/plan_files_02/2631/Gee-Bee_CL.pdf



Could see this as an ' experts ' racing event at Nats .
Anybody taking it seriously could be thrown in the river .

Milss .75s or baby bees on 8x4 props & 30 odd ft. ( a std. for something length ) lines .
dont want to make it too easy , & the ten year olds'd have to be in with a chance to show the rest up .



anyone who hasnt fallen over lauging , if over 20 , by the end of the race , is for it .

Offline wwwarbird

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 8084
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2015, 07:02:47 PM »

 Huh? It's really no different than any basic sheet wing trainer, just looks cooler than most.
Narrowly averting disaster since 1964! 

Wayne Willey
Albert Lea, MN U.S.A. IC C/L Aircraft Modeler, Ex AMA member

Offline Terry Caron

  • 2017
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1107
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2015, 07:47:56 PM »
No, no Matt - you misunderstood!
Remember - the Gee Bee R-1 was a killer.
This is a TRAINER for Gee Bee pilots!  LL~  LL~

Yeah, silly but cool.

Terry

NACA member, Huntsville, AL
AMA 249824
NRA Life Member

Offline Dave_Trible

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6708
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2015, 07:51:29 PM »
I don't know anything about the Mills but the plane looks to have all the right basics- and yes looks neat.  I prefer trainers that are more like stunt trainers with thicker wings and lighter wing loading.  They'll fly slower and groove more easily.  The risk is of course more damage on impact.  I saw the Minor brothers teaching kids to fly on a slowed down combat wing- had it going on well.  But this Gee Bee will work.  

Dave
AMA 20934
FAA Certificate FA3ATY4T94
 Investing in a Gaza resort if the billionaire doesn't take all my social security check

Offline john e. holliday

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22974
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2015, 08:45:36 PM »
I have lost count of how many people I have taught with the old Ringmaster with the old Fox .35 set just lean enough to get air borne.   But then I soloed my Brother-in-law on a 1/2A Hacker combat plane.  A couple of months later he flew my Bi-Slob and had a grin from ear to ear.
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Jim Carter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 953
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2015, 01:06:48 PM »
 ??? ??? Well, I never!!! ??? ???  Matt .... you have now officially hurt my feelings!!  :-[ :-[  It is interesting that you would chose this one model out of the hundreds of trainers to write about!!  :-\ :-\  I built one of these specifically for the Cox Reed Speed Contest and I've been waiting for the right day and some helpers so I can video it in-flight as per the rules or the contest  :-\.  I can say, for the purposes of practice flights, it flies just fine and although I have a stock Tee Dee .049 on it, it's not unrealistic to think that my 8 and 10 year old granddaughters should be able to handle 15 laps once they learn the basics  ;)!!

(Matt, I'm not really upset .... just funnin' but it was a fun project to build.  Based upon it's characteristics, I've even given thought to scaling it up a bit for say a 25-35 size, but it may be one of those "someday fun projects!)

Jim Carter

Offline M Spencer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 5238
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2015, 08:57:33 PM »
BRAVO.  ;)

Should be positively meanacing with a tee Dee .  %^@ LL~

Must admit to some ' tounge in cheek ' as to the Title . Though maybe theres tales of attack ( the pilot ) aeroplanes and practising Crashes .

Had a ' bad day ' once or twice training . On Return, to how did it go , the answer was " We practised all the crashes .
Another occasion Id told the trainee to ' Put Them There ' , ( my Jandles ) " Now Stand Beteen Them " ( to avoid the stunt lines ) .
Second Lap it met Crankshaft to Steel Goal Post pole , manadged to break the inner wing and Fuse. too , a mini goodyear- OS 10 .
Was tight at BDC after that and wouldnt run again untill we' striped & reassembled it .

RIGHT , where were we .

We possitively DEMAND to see the Video of the Flight , HERE - PLEASE . ( or a link ) .

Might Stir something up .Open Class Maelstrom Gee Bee !  %^@

Must Pull the drawaing out & get cracking ! The Olde Mills p75 will be init .
Early 70s a squeeze bottle on the outer wing of a Modelair GNAT got it airbourne for more than twenty minutes , I think half full
after the first flight of an half hour or more . The initial  ( Full weight ) flight was Nose Up untill ten minutes of fuel had burnt off .
So limited flight envelope there . Lightened up a bit it gained some performance. Almost .
Three or four Torbayites mastered basic control in a few flights . So thinking fitting a streame would likewise tame most planes
and makes observation and docility appropriate to the task .

Have you got a stop watch , and what lines are you trying . ? S?P H^^

Offline John Park

  • Agricola
  • 2017
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 483
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #7 on: December 07, 2015, 06:09:26 AM »
Ray Malmstrom was an absolute LEGEND!  His idea of model flying was that it should be, first and foremost, fun - and to this end he produced some truly delightful designs, all small and therefore virtually crashproof.  Just go to Outerzone and search on 'Malmstrom', and you'll see what I mean.  'Saucy Satellite' puts the Gee Bee in the shade for sheer wackiness, even if it may have been a bit of a handful to fly: but if you ever feel like dabbling in little rubber-powered free-flight models made of 1/32" sheet, try 'Long John' - if I can't get 75 seconds out of mine on a calm day, I'm not trying!

Regards
John
You want to make 'em nice, else you get mad lookin' at 'em!

Offline Dane Martin

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2804
  • heli pilot BHOR
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #8 on: December 07, 2015, 09:46:28 AM »
??? ??? Well, I never!!! ??? ???  Matt .... you have now officially hurt my feelings!!  :-[ :-[  It is interesting that you would chose this one model out of the hundreds of trainers to write about!!  :-\ :-\  I built one of these specifically for the Cox Reed Speed Contest and I've been waiting for the right day and some helpers so I can video it in-flight as per the rules or the contest  :-\.  I can say, for the purposes of practice flights, it flies just fine and although I have a stock Tee Dee .049 on it, it's not unrealistic to think that my 8 and 10 year old granddaughters should be able to handle 15 laps once they learn the basics  ;)!!

(Matt, I'm not really upset .... just funnin' but it was a fun project to build.  Based upon it's characteristics, I've even given thought to scaling it up a bit for say a 25-35 size, but it may be one of those "someday fun projects!)

Jim Carter

Carter, that's amazing! How could i have guessed that you would be the one guy who still has one of these flying? Lol

Offline john e. holliday

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22974
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #9 on: December 07, 2015, 10:13:20 AM »
Remember the early years when someone promoted Goodyear Racing.  I competed with Gee Bee because it was different and almost as fast as the Folkerts.   
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Jim Carter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 953
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #10 on: December 07, 2015, 12:30:05 PM »
Carter, that's amazing! How could i have guessed that you would be the one guy who still has one of these flying? Lol
L.O.L.!!  Bro. Dane ;D wouldn't you know it!!  It's almost like he was looking at my stash of planes in my workshop!!  r.o.t.f.l.!!  What a hoot!!   LL~ LL~

Offline MikeyPratt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 773
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #11 on: December 07, 2015, 03:19:21 PM »
Hi Jim,
Awesome!! That is really cute and I bet it's a handful, I'm thinking about a .15 size would be really fun.

Later,
Mikey

Offline George

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1468
  • Love people, Use things.
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #12 on: December 07, 2015, 04:46:39 PM »
Looking over the plans and text, it really was a basic trainer. The Mills .75 (replicas) are not powerful engines but they are fun engines. The text refers to a 6x4, 6x6, or 7x4 prop which are for diesels of that size (.75cc = .045ci), and 20'-22' "thread" (I'm guessing Dacron) lines. Note also the elevator limiter used for the first few flights.

It looks like a fun plane with that power. With a TD .049-.051 it can be anywhere between LYAO and serious.

NICE FIND!  H^^ 

George

PS. I downloaded the plans from Outerzone.  ;D
George Bain
AMA 23454

Offline M Spencer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 5238
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #13 on: December 07, 2015, 07:27:16 PM »
Heading was a stab in the dark , as the Library Computer was about to jump ship . Nevertheless . . .  8)

The Folkerts is similar in being an opposite extreme , perhaps. Figure this one'd go o.k. with a 21/29 RV abc . n1



Supposed to have an old Torpedo 15, I think . Plan is on Hipocket Via. google pics .

WHY scale it Up for a 29 or 35 Jim , It'd fit in as it is ! . LL~ S?P H^^

Offline John Park

  • Agricola
  • 2017
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 483
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #14 on: December 08, 2015, 06:31:15 AM »
I don't know about the replicas, but the original Mills .75 was the ultimate beginner's engine - incredibly easy to start (for a diesel, that is), adequately powerful for the kind of kit trainer you could buy in England in the mid-1950s (KeilKraft Champ, Jasco Trojan etc.) and so well-made that it was impossible to wear out.  I have one from about 1955 that has goodness knows how many hours on it, and it has as much compression as it ever had.  Just for fun, I'm building a KeilKraft Champ for it - 7x4 prop., 30ft. Terylene (i.e. Dacron) lines - to get one of my childhood friends back into C/L.  He hasn't held a handle for 55 years, and will appreciate something un-threatening and crashproof!

Regards
John
You want to make 'em nice, else you get mad lookin' at 'em!

Offline john e. holliday

  • 25 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22974
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #15 on: December 08, 2015, 09:15:49 AM »
Heading was a stab in the dark , as the Library Computer was about to jump ship . Nevertheless . . .  8)

The Folkerts is similar in being an opposite extreme , perhaps. Figure this one'd go o.k. with a 21/29 RV abc . n1



Supposed to have an old Torpedo 15, I think . Plan is on Hipocket Via. google pics .

WHY scale it Up for a 29 or 35 Jim , It'd fit in as it is ! . LL~ S?P H^^
 

Back then this was the plane to have, especially with the new Tee Dee .15 that had just hit the market.   
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Jim Carter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 953
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #16 on: December 08, 2015, 01:16:59 PM »
Hi Jim,
Awesome!! That is really cute and I bet it's a handful, I'm thinking about a .15 size would be really fun.

Later,
Mikey
Hi Mike!  Thanks for the kind words.  Actually it's pretty easy to handle.  I agree, with the idea of scaling up a notch or two but that's on my "one o' these days" list!   ;D

Jim

Offline Clancy Arnold

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1453
  • I am 5 Ft. 8 In., the Taube is 7 Ft. 4 In.
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #17 on: December 08, 2015, 08:44:23 PM »
Request for comments.
would a cox .049 dual bypass reed valve fly this plane?  Recommended prop to use?

I am thinking it would be fun to build one this winter.
Clancy
Clancy Arnold
Indianapolis, IN   AMA 12560 LM-S
U/Tronics Control
U/Control with electronics added.

Offline M Spencer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 5238
Re: Stupidist Trainer ?
« Reply #18 on: December 08, 2015, 09:14:53 PM »
No wocking furries , Clancy .
We used to try baby bees on no nitro & they needed a 6 x 4 , but on 10 % they should swing a 8 x 4,
which is what they use on the ' Texaco ' , Im Told . The DUAL BYPASS . So a single bypass .049'd fly it.

The Baby Bee is the American Version of the Mills p.75 ! :##

As a ' trainer ' motor the Mills is fine for flying on Vacant Lots ( or bombsites ) .Noise Complaints would indicate a phyciatric condition .
They make a muted muttering / chuntering inaudable over a turned down television ( the opiate of the masses ) set .

Hurtling round on 20 ft. lines , it'd keep them tight . Im just wondering how it'll go on 32'6 or whatever which length Mouse or 1/2A T/R were .
We shall see, no doubt.

Some of the replicer mills have a ' indeferant ' reputation or manufacturing standards .
The Doonsides good but a notch heavier . The IRVINE is the go as far as Racing is concerned . %^@

Seeing a Irvine 1.3 tow a Taipan Trainer at about 80 mph was a laugh / wake up .
Around 1950 a Mills 1.3 on a 8 x 8 in a ' Nippy ' ? set a 88 mph record ( a speed plane ) .
Sonds like some of the Indian Mills fall to bits or fell together , but theyre cheap .
The Irvine 1.3 is single ball race, dunno on the .75 but think maybe.

Tags: