In the US all diesels are a novelty. It seems to me that PAW should pull it if it pulls like a good 25 or 19 glow. Diesels have a little more torque, right, than a typical glow. My original Buster was the CG kit, it flew with a fox 35, a much milder ship that showed the same balance as the Brodak plane with the potent Tower 40. I've gathered PAW 19s are a common choice in the UK for sport planes in the Ringmaster/Buster/Flite Streak size range, planes commonly fox 35 powered in the US. If so, should make for a balanced fun plane. Interestingly enough I put together my own design with a Buster Profile, thick airfoil, longer rear moment arm and flaps. Same 40" wing length. An LA25 was over matched. Had to go to a honking Tower 40. Still sorting the plane out. It flies now, something more like a stunt plane, but a bit fast. Probably a tweener. But the wood in my experiment was not carefully chosen and the airfoil is fat. So. A stock Buster, no flaps, with the typical good Brodak wood. Should work with a 25 or 19 glow. Guess you can fly the PAW19 with 52' .012 lines, at least initially, seeing if you've got the power to keep the plane out on the lines.
What's the story with the PAW19, run characteristics, reliability, typical prop size/rpm etc? Must be an attractive engine. Hear about them. What's nice about that diesel?
Thanx,
Dennis Moriz