stunthanger.com

General control line discussion => Open Forum => Topic started by: YakNine on January 17, 2020, 02:35:25 PM

Title: Sig Berkeley Lancer
Post by: YakNine on January 17, 2020, 02:35:25 PM
I am considering a Sig Berkeley Lancer kit I was wondering if anyone knows if it comes with landing gear as I fly with a stooge a lot. None of the pictures I have seen show a gear on it, its not a big deal to put something else on it I'm just curious. I think its a sharp looking plane. TJ
Title: Re: Sig Berkeley Lancer
Post by: EddyR on January 17, 2020, 03:42:01 PM
I think the Lancer was a combat model so no need for a gear.
ED
Title: Re: Sig Berkeley Lancer
Post by: Tony Drago on January 17, 2020, 04:26:21 PM
Should have room to install some type of lg.
Title: Re: Sig Berkeley Lancer
Post by: YakNine on January 17, 2020, 06:00:24 PM
Thanks Tony , plenty of room, I'm sure it would make a fun sport model and the price is easy to take too. I just like how it looks it just says 1950's to me when I look at it. TJ
Title: Re: Sig Berkeley Lancer
Post by: don boka on January 17, 2020, 06:10:14 PM
The Lancer was Art Pawloski's combat plane and I can guarantee it did not have a landing gear. If I recall correctly Art won Sr. Combat with it at the Nats in the fifties. The Atom was Art's Precision Aerobatics airplane and a winner as well. I think that is the year he won both events. A Fox 35 with a bit of fuel additive was the power.
 I would imagine Berkeley took a few liberties with the design.
It was an I-Beam design which at the time was very popular with the Strathmoor Model Airplane Club of Detroit with quite a "Secret" method of construction. I recall reading that the I-Beam originated in the thirties and free flight was the thing. U-control was not quite around at that time. Could be mistaken. Enjoy!
Don Boka.
Title: Re: Sig Berkeley Lancer
Post by: Dennis Leonhardi on January 17, 2020, 06:49:41 PM
I flew a lot of combat back in those dark ages and couldn't imagine the design was very rugged, but it surely does bring back the era.  And the Atom is just plain gore-jus … Have fun, TJ!  Pawloski must have been a very accomplished flyer.

I have plans for several combat models of the era, as does Bob Mears.

Dennis
Title: Re: Sig Berkeley Lancer
Post by: wwwarbird on January 17, 2020, 07:40:22 PM
 I picked up one of the Sig kits at the Polk City, IA contest last year. Bob Smith from Sig was participating there so I conned him into swinging by the factory early Sunday morning and bringing it to the contest. I too kept looking at it and just couldn't get over the great period look so I decided I had to have one. Didn't realize until this thread though that it was an I-Beam design. My Sig version is still sealed in the plastic for now so I don't know, did they retain the I-Beam construction?
Title: Re: Sig Berkeley Lancer
Post by: Tony Drago on January 17, 2020, 08:52:00 PM
I would say yes.
Title: Re: Sig Berkeley Lancer
Post by: wwwarbird on January 17, 2020, 09:57:57 PM
I would say yes.

 Where was the picture clipped from?
Title: Re: Sig Berkeley Lancer
Post by: Tony Drago on January 17, 2020, 10:10:06 PM
From a Sig ad on the net.
Title: Re: Sig Berkeley Lancer
Post by: Trostle on January 17, 2020, 10:40:55 PM
It is unfortunate that the Lancer is not OTS legal.  This would be one of the top OTS ships.  But, alas.

Keith
Title: Re: Sig Berkeley Lancer
Post by: John Park on January 18, 2020, 08:14:12 AM
This design would be a perfect candidate for a simple two-wheel drop-off undercarriage - you can use nice big wheels for flying off grass, but make sure you put on plenty of daylight-fluorescent paint, or you'll waste a lot of time looking for it after every flight!

Regards
John
Title: Re: Sig Berkeley Lancer
Post by: wwwarbird on January 18, 2020, 01:47:16 PM
From a Sig ad on the net.

 Thanks Tony.  H^^
Title: Re: Sig Berkeley Lancer
Post by: Tony Drago on January 18, 2020, 01:58:09 PM
 H^^