News:


  • June 08, 2024, 04:07:16 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Humongous number 2  (Read 1889 times)

Offline Jim Kraft

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3412
  • AMA78415
Humongous number 2
« on: April 22, 2008, 05:25:48 PM »
Here is a couple of pictures of my second Humongous. It is just about finished. All Dharma silk, fuselage and all, Sig clear dope on the wings and tail with orange dye for plastics mixed in. Colors are all Sig dope with a couple of coats of clear over them. It is set up like my first one so that I can run either a Fox 59, or an Anderson Spitfire. My first one fly's so well I decided to build another. It's understandable there are so many built, as it is a great flying plane.
Jim Kraft

Offline James Mills

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1297
  • Welcome to the Stunt Hanger.
Re: Humongous number 2
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2008, 06:10:02 PM »
Very cool, I have a couple of ST. 51's not being used, may have to build one of those some day.

James
AMA 491167

Offline Kim Mortimore

  • 2013 Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 621
Re: Humongous number 2
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2008, 06:18:59 PM »
Jim,
Very nice job!  Another paint job done the old-fashioned way?  My friends have been having lots of trouble with "orange peel" and other adhesion problems on their sprayed finishes lately.  Eegad. 

Thanks,
Kim Mortimore
« Last Edit: April 22, 2008, 07:20:13 PM by Kim Mortimore »
Kim Mortimore
Santa Clara, CA

Online Paul Taylor

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6090
  • If God is your Co-pilot - swap seats!
    • Our Local CL Web Page
Re: Humongous number 2
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2008, 06:20:43 PM »
Looks very Nice Jim!

What is a Anderson Spitfire?

Paul  H^^
Paul
AMA 842917

Tight Lines = Fun Times

Offline Joe Gilbert

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 519
Re: Humongous number 2
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2008, 06:40:53 PM »
Jim , very nice look forward to seeing it fly.
Joe Gilbert

Offline Kim Mortimore

  • 2013 Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 621
Re: Humongous number 2
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2008, 06:47:33 PM »
Looks very Nice Jim!

What is a Anderson Spitfire?

Paul  H^^

A stripper in Kansas City.    ~^   %^@   LL~
Kim Mortimore
Santa Clara, CA

Offline Steve Helmick

  • AMA Member and supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 9955
Re: Humongous number 2
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2008, 06:54:27 PM »
Very cool, I have a couple of ST. 51's not being used, may have to build one of those some day.

James


For glow power, a .46LA is a great match for the Humongous (mine weighed about 47 oz). Jim Rhodes has a light one with a Magnum XLS .36 that flies well, I think about 36 oz. The thought of a G.51 (a detuned one) in a Humongus did cross my mind, but fuel capacity might be a problem. If you're thinking of the ST .51bb or pb, probably a better match, tho the fuel tank space might need some careful thought. They can come out tail heavy, so the .51 isn't too bad an idea.  H^^ Steve
"The United States has become a place where professional athletes and entertainers are mistaken for people of importance." - Robert Heinlein

In 1944 18-20 year old's stormed beaches, and parachuted behind enemy lines to almost certain death.  In 2015 18-20 year old's need safe zones so people don't hurt their feelings.

Offline Jim Kraft

  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3412
  • AMA78415
Re: Humongous number 2
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2008, 07:55:45 PM »
Butyrate all the way  Kim. I did use my airbrush to spray the clear/orange dye, and to spray one coat of clear over that, then brushed all the rest. Brushing is good therapy. Paul; An Anderson Spitfire is a 1948-49 spark ignition motor built by Mel Anderson. They were made in both 60, and 65 size, and either ringed or lapped. Here is a couple of pictures of one I have that is a replica built by Marvin Miller.
Jim Kraft

Offline Ray

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 99
Re: Humongous number 2
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2008, 07:56:57 PM »

What is a Anderson Spitfire?


Surely that was some sort of joke?   All you have to do is hang around some old modellers just a little while, and several of the older Old Farts will start talking about sparkies, and when they do, the Super Cykes and Atwood Champions and Andersen Spitfires will come up.  (I don't think that I'm misspelling Andersen with my two "E's", either). 

Offline John Crocker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 222
Re: Humongous number 2
« Reply #9 on: April 23, 2008, 04:58:30 AM »
Quote
Humongous number 2

Boy am I glad this thread is about a plane and not something else!   LL~

(can't believe it took you guys this long)

Online Paul Taylor

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 6090
  • If God is your Co-pilot - swap seats!
    • Our Local CL Web Page
Re: Humongous number 2
« Reply #10 on: April 24, 2008, 07:38:38 PM »
Butyrate all the way  Kim. I did use my airbrush to spray the clear/orange dye, and to spray one coat of clear over that, then brushed all the rest. Brushing is good therapy. Paul; An Anderson Spitfire is a 1948-49 spark ignition motor built by Mel Anderson. They were made in both 60, and 65 size, and either ringed or lapped. Here is a couple of pictures of one I have that is a replica built by Marvin Miller.

Thanks Jim for sharing the picture.
That engine looks brand new.

I have not been exposed to very many old engines. I know what a spakie is but could not tell you how they are setup.

Paul  H^^
Paul
AMA 842917

Tight Lines = Fun Times

Offline Garf

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1817
    • Hangar Flying
Re: Humongous number 2
« Reply #11 on: April 24, 2008, 10:01:00 PM »
This is a "transistor" ignition version.

Offline Garf

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1817
    • Hangar Flying
Re: Humongous number 2
« Reply #12 on: April 24, 2008, 10:12:43 PM »


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here