Link 1
Stunt Hangar YouTube
P.A.M.P.A.
AMA
Balsa Density Calculator
This topic
This board
Entire forum
Google
Home
Help
Tags
Advertise
Login
Register
News:
July 14, 2025, 04:57:01 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
stunthanger.com
»
General control line discussion
»
Open Forum
(Moderators:
RandySmith
,
Steve Berry
) »
ringmaster imperial engine choice
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: ringmaster imperial engine choice (Read 1099 times)
James C. Martin
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Ensign
Posts: 38
ringmaster imperial engine choice
«
on:
May 09, 2014, 01:47:55 PM »
Anyone have an opinion on witch os max 46 would a better choice for a ringmaster imperial I have a la-s .46 and a .46 fx converted to control line the ringmaster imperial has a 52 inch wing with flaps and built up fuselage and tail feathers or is this too much engine for this aircraft?
Logged
Tim Wescott
25 supporter
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Admiral
Posts: 12907
Re: ringmaster imperial engine choice
«
Reply #1 on:
May 09, 2014, 02:05:47 PM »
I dunno about the FX, but the 46LA should work fine.
Logged
AMA 64232
The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.
steve bittner
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Lieutenant
Posts: 75
Re: ringmaster imperial engine choice
«
Reply #2 on:
May 09, 2014, 04:04:23 PM »
Quote from: Tim Wescott on May 09, 2014, 02:05:47 PM
I dunno about the FX, but the 46LA should work fine.
Any good running 35 or 40 will be just fine with 10-5 prop, maybe 10-4 if alittle to fast.
Logged
James C. Martin
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Ensign
Posts: 38
Re: ringmaster imperial engine choice
«
Reply #3 on:
May 09, 2014, 06:19:02 PM »
thank you for the info the 46 fx i have is new never seen fuel took a new venturi from a 46sf along with the needle and spraybar all fits the 46 fx very well do have a sig super chipmunk to be assembled thought about using the fx for this aircraft guess i need to bench run this engine ans see how it performs.
Logged
Garf
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Admiral
Posts: 1817
Re: ringmaster imperial engine choice
«
Reply #4 on:
May 09, 2014, 06:31:12 PM »
It might prove a bit too much.
Logged
"SAVE ALL THE PIECES"-Phil Brown
http://hangarflying.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=wire
Bill Little
2017
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Admiral
Posts: 12668
Second in COMMAND
Re: ringmaster imperial engine choice
«
Reply #5 on:
May 09, 2014, 07:15:45 PM »
Hi James,
One problem is that the room for a fuel tank is pretty small in the Imperial.
BIG Bear
RNMM/AMM
Logged
Big Bear
<><
Aberdeen, NC
James Hylton Motorsports/NASCAR/ARCA
AMA 95351 (got one of my old numbers back!
)
Trying to get by
John Stiles
2014 Supporters
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Admiral
Posts: 1928
one shot=one kill
Re: ringmaster imperial engine choice
«
Reply #6 on:
May 10, 2014, 05:51:02 AM »
I'm using an Enya .29 at present, and probably gonna switch to the Enya .35 I got from Bill Little.[same size and mounting], it flies great, here's the maiden flight. P/S the little guy is my grandson who loves to trip the stooge:
Logged
John Stiles Tulip, Ar.
john e. holliday
25 supporter
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Admiral
Posts: 22992
Re: ringmaster imperial engine choice
«
Reply #7 on:
May 10, 2014, 08:29:43 AM »
I my self am finishing the first kit of the Ringmaster Imperial that Walter Umland produced. It is shown with an LA .46 on the plans and that is what I am using.
Logged
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS 66203
AMA 23530 Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
stunthanger.com
»
General control line discussion
»
Open Forum
(Moderators:
RandySmith
,
Steve Berry
) »
ringmaster imperial engine choice