News:


  • May 28, 2024, 10:13:40 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Disturbing editorial!  (Read 6200 times)

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Disturbing editorial!
« on: March 27, 2012, 09:34:24 AM »
The Los Angeles Times had an editorial today criticising the new FAA/AMA agreement as being an open invitation for terrorists!  I have sent copies to the AMA officials who should know about it.  I would post it here, but am not sure about the legality of mass copies.  I am pretty sure you can access it at LATIMES.COM/OPINION  ~^
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline Shultzie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 3474
  • Don Shultz "1969 Nats Sting Ray"
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2012, 10:22:03 AM »
 HB~>
Next...they'll OUTLAW "ROCKS N' BRICKS ON STRINGS!" y1
« Last Edit: March 27, 2012, 03:23:47 PM by Shultzie »
Don Shultz

Offline Randy Cuberly

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3674
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2012, 10:36:53 AM »
That shows the incredible stupidity of the editor(s). Terrorists will use what ever they can, rules be damned. Same for any criminal, they don't care about any laws whatsoever, they do what ever they please until caught, then released by bleeding hearts. Best cure is the Colt 1911 .45 ACP. Got mine. H^^

I agree except I prefer a Glock...

Randy Cuberly
Randy Cuberly
Tucson, AZ

Mike Griffin

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2012, 10:40:36 AM »
9mm Taurus.

larry borden

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2012, 10:43:09 AM »
That shows the incredible stupidity of the editor(s). Terrorists will use what ever they can, rules be damned. Same for any criminal, they don't care about any laws whatsoever, they do what ever they please until caught, then released by bleeding hearts. Best cure is the Colt 1911 .45 ACP. Got mine. H^^

I have been investing in brass and lead and steel for some time now.

It's just like the gun control debate, the bad guys don't follow the rules.

What Mike said.

Mike Griffin

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #5 on: March 27, 2012, 10:45:24 AM »
The Los Angeles Times had an editorial today criticising the new FAA/AMA agreement as being an open invitation for terrorists!  I have sent copies to the AMA officials who should know about it.  I would post it here, but am not sure about the legality of mass copies.  I am pretty sure you can access it at LATIMES.COM/OPINION  ~^

Hi Larry and thanks for bringing this to everyone's attention because thinking like this affects us all.  I found the article under "Drones" and I am posting the part here that refers to Model Airplanes... I don't give a crap whether the LA Times likes it or not....

Here it is guys

So what can we do to reduce the risk? One good place to start is the "model aircraft" provision in the new aviation law, which allows hobbyists to operate drones weighing up to 55 pounds with essentially no governmental oversight. The law allows recreational drones to be operated in accordance with "community-based" safety guidelines established by a "nationwide community-based organization." The inclusion of this language was a lobbying victory for model airplane enthusiasts. But is it really in the broader national interest?

It is not. One of the hallmarks of an effective national antiterrorism policy is consistency. The hobbyist exception is glaringly inconsistent with our overall approach to antiterrorism. By what logic, for example, do we prevent airline passengers from taking 8-ounce plastic water bottles through security checkpoints, while permitting anyone who so desires to operate a 50-pound, video-guided drone, no questions asked?

The overwhelming majority of the people in the model airplane and drone hobbyist community would never consider carrying out a terrorist attack. Yet the same could be said for the overwhelming majority of airline passengers, all of whom are subject to the same rules about what can be taken through airport security checkpoints.

Given the realities of the world we live in, it doesn't seem unreasonable to require all civilian U.S. operators of drones capable of carrying a significant payload to obtain a license. A useful model can be found in fishing licenses, which provide an inexpensive, non-burdensome way for government agencies to know who is fishing.

A licensing program obviously wouldn't eliminate the threat of drone terrorism. After all, terrorists won't necessarily feel compelled to get a license. But the federal government has a legitimate national security interest in monitoring domestic drone use. Today, its ability to do so is inadequate. A licensing program would help plug a critical gap in the government's knowledge regarding who should — and shouldn't — be operating drones.

In September 2001, the United States was caught by surprise. Few of us had pondered the possibility that commercial airliners could be turned into weapons of terrorism. With drones, we know now — before any attack on U.S. soil has occurred — that they could be used for terrorism. There is no excuse for not doing our best to make sure that it never happens.

John Villasenor is a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a professor of electrical engineering at UCLA.
« Last Edit: March 27, 2012, 11:13:30 AM by Mike Griffin »

Offline FLOYD CARTER

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4462
    • owner
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #6 on: March 27, 2012, 11:24:04 AM »
The bad guys can easily copy airframes, but it is almost impossible to "reverse engineer" the complex electronics that include imbedded software and firmware.  Without the sophisticated electronics, a drone is just a plane ready to crash!

Floyd
90 years, but still going (mostly)
AMA #796  SAM #188  LSF #020

Offline Tim Wescott

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12823
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #7 on: March 27, 2012, 11:33:18 AM »
In my oh-so-humble opinion, we all stumbled badly in our response to 9-11.

Yes, if we want to avoid more terrorist attacks, we should go to the Library of Congress and burn the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and a bunch of other documents that define our country.  Then we should cower in our basements for the rest of our natural lives, and hand all of our civil liberties over to the FBI.

But if we want to know whether that's a wise response, we need look no further than the name of the enemy that we're fighting: terrorists.  Not bombists or plane-crashists, or any other word that means "people who attack".  No, they're "people who make us fear".  And when we give into that fear, we're not just letting them win, we're helping them win.  When we're too afraid to allow our neighbors to enjoy their lives, when we're too afraid to allow people to carry common tools like pocketknives, when we're too afraid to allow people who look different, or talk different, or worship different, to enjoy the same freedoms that our Constitution promises to all -- then we've not only given in to the terrorists, but we're doing their work for them.

I used to get bullied a lot when I was in grade school, until I learned that responding to a bully by cringing and cowering just meant that you cringed and cowered your way through life.  Looking them in the eye and telling them that they can smack you, but they'll still be an ass**** and you'll still be right may get you a black eye, but that eye will be attached to a head that you can hold up high.
AMA 64232

The problem with electric is that once you get the smoke generator and sound system installed, the plane is too heavy.

Offline George

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1468
  • Love people, Use things.
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #8 on: March 27, 2012, 12:14:28 PM »
As long as we allow extremely liberal do-gooders to tie our hands behind our back, we will get picked on.

We all know the appropriate solutions, we just won't express them...let alone do them.

Whoopass...don't bother taking names.

George

PS. As far as the drones...the author was probably not aware that the funny little numbers on a model's wings are traceable to a license.
George Bain
AMA 23454

Offline John Stiles

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1928
  • one shot=one kill
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #9 on: March 27, 2012, 02:07:19 PM »
I have been investing in brass and lead and steel for some time now.

It's just like the gun control debate, the bad guys don't follow the rules.

What Mike said.
Even if the badguy's total IQ amounts to less than brilliant....they will find other incognito badguys that will show them how to do anything they want. I know of a case where the Feds asked a teenager working in a gunshop to rig a .22cal rifle to shoot full-auto. Then when he succeeded[with a little help]....they put him in prison. D>K
John Stiles             Tulip, Ar.

Offline Perry Rose

  • Go vote, it's so easy dead people do it all the time.
  • 2015
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1677
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #10 on: March 27, 2012, 03:07:08 PM »
There's no difference between a liberal politician and a news reporter/columnist. It's always "do as I say, believe what I write or else".
I may be wrong but I doubt it.
I wouldn't take her to a dog fight even if she had a chance to win.
The worst part of growing old is remembering when you were young.

Offline rustler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 719
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #11 on: March 27, 2012, 03:11:58 PM »
It's not too long (but post-9/11) since a well know screw supplier which I had used previously, refused to supply me with std. 4-40 screws because post 9/11 security rules prohibited export of such sensitive items!  ???  HB~>
Ian Russell.
[I can remember the schedule o.k., the problem is remembering what was the last manoeuvre I just flew!].

Offline RC Storick

  • Forum owner
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 12421
  • The finish starts with the first piece of wood cut
    • Stunt Hangar
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #12 on: March 27, 2012, 03:22:45 PM »
John Villasenor is a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a professor of electrical engineering at UCLA.

Another do gooder MORON. Like was said it will stop nothing. This in America has to stop! We are the only counrty that give a color coded terriost warning. If we let them win they will. I will not live in fear.
AMA 12366

Offline Douglas Ames

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1299
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #13 on: March 27, 2012, 03:52:01 PM »
I have my "Drone-on-a-String" License - it's called an AMA membership card.

AMA 656546

If you do a little bit every day it will get done, or you can do it tomorrow.

Offline John Fitzgerald

  • No longer an AMA Member
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • ****
  • Posts: 253
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #14 on: March 27, 2012, 04:19:08 PM »
In my opinion, the editorial writer may be highly educated, but lives in an alternate reality.   His opinions are likely worthless.  We have another similar one here, who is very highly educated, but writes "out there" editorials.  People pay him very little mind.  Stuff like that carries very little weight with most people.

Offline Randy Powell

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 10478
  • TreeTop Flyer
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #15 on: March 27, 2012, 04:46:48 PM »
It's the same logic gun control guys use. Keep the public from owning guns because then we won't have gun violence. I'm pretty sure the local gang bangers don't go out and get a license to have a gun, just as I'm sure they bought it illegally. When you control guns, all you really control is law abiding citizen's access to them, not criminals. This is the same logic. And it is just a stupid.
Member in good standing of P.I.S.T
(Politically Incorrect Stunt Team)
AMA 67711
 Randy Powell

larry borden

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #16 on: March 27, 2012, 04:50:10 PM »
Another example of some our 'educated idiots', not to mention our 'elected idiots'. Fire 'em all. They don't live in the real world.

Amen Randy. Common sense.

Offline Mike Wada

  • ACE
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ensign
  • ****
  • Posts: 26
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #17 on: March 27, 2012, 05:04:27 PM »


Howdy,

As mentioned earlier, good things to stock up on are:  brass, bullets, powder and contest balsa.

Aloha,

Mike Wada
Mike Wada
AMA 512393

Offline Clint Ormosen

  • 2019 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 2628
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #18 on: March 27, 2012, 05:11:34 PM »
Even if the badguy's total IQ amounts to less than brilliant....they will find other incognito badguys that will show them how to do anything they want. I know of a case where the Feds asked a teenager working in a gunshop to rig a .22cal rifle to shoot full-auto. Then when he succeeded[with a little help]....they put him in prison. D>K

John, do you have a link to info on that? I'd like to post it on the Calguns.net forum.
-Clint-

AMA 559593
Finding new and innovated ways to screw up the pattern since 1993

Offline Mike Callas

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 333
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #19 on: March 27, 2012, 05:41:29 PM »
50 pound drone!!!
Hey how did they know about my C/L stunter?

Actually a UCLA EE prof should know better.
When you take the mass of all the components, airframe, engine (motor), fuel/batts, R/C electronics, Video link and camera, telemetry etc.
That really doen't leave much for payload. Maybe an M-80 and a bag of Poo.

I'd be more concerned with a terrorist changing my country one executive order at a time (ooops, Dimitri, is this keyboard on?)

Offline Mike Callas

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 333
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #20 on: March 27, 2012, 05:44:23 PM »
John, do you have a link to info on that? I'd like to post it on the Calguns.net forum.

Another example is Randy Weaver. And I'm sure the folks at Calguns are familiar with that atrocity.

Offline Jim Thomerson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 2087
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #21 on: March 27, 2012, 06:07:30 PM »
Sounds like we should go back to referring to the AMA membership card as a license.  It used to be called that.

Offline evocator

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • New Pilot
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #22 on: March 27, 2012, 06:13:54 PM »
 I'm a liberal and been flying control line for 54 years.
Jim Williams

Offline John Stiles

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1928
  • one shot=one kill
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #23 on: March 27, 2012, 06:45:08 PM »
John, do you have a link to info on that? I'd like to post it on the Calguns.net forum.
Nope, he is my cousin's son...it happened several years ago in LR Arkansas....funny, now everybody has auto weapons.
John Stiles             Tulip, Ar.

Offline Randy Cuberly

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3674
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #24 on: March 27, 2012, 07:12:59 PM »
50 pound drone!!!
Hey how did they know about my C/L stunter?

Actually a UCLA EE prof should know better.
When you take the mass of all the components, airframe, engine (motor), fuel/batts, R/C electronics, Video link and camera, telemetry etc.
That really doen't leave much for payload. Maybe an M-80 and a bag of Poo.

I'd be more concerned with a terrorist changing my country one executive order at a time (ooops, Dimitri, is this keyboard on?)


Mike,
Thanks for saving me the trouble of mentioning this.
If terrorists were to use a drone to destroy something worth their while it most definitely would not be a legitimate model airplane.  After all Iran has a predator drone that they have likely duplicated many times over by now.  It would be a very easy matter to bring them into the US over the very "open" border into Arizona where I live.
They have no more to do with model airplanes than a 105 Howitzer has to do with handguns.

Randy Cuberly
Randy Cuberly
Tucson, AZ

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #25 on: March 27, 2012, 08:29:35 PM »
Actually, the vehicle of choice for terrorists is the automobile.  Perhaps if we licensed them and drivers?   LL~
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Offline Dennis Leonhardi

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1777
    • AirClassix on eBay
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #26 on: March 27, 2012, 11:18:43 PM »
In my oh-so-humble opinion, we all stumbled badly in our response to 9-11.

Yes, if we want to avoid more terrorist attacks, we should go to the Library of Congress and burn the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and a bunch of other documents that define our country.  Then we should cower in our basements for the rest of our natural lives, and hand all of our civil liberties over to the FBI.

But if we want to know whether that's a wise response, we need look no further than the name of the enemy that we're fighting: terrorists.  Not bombists or plane-crashists, or any other word that means "people who attack".  No, they're "people who make us fear".  And when we give into that fear, we're not just letting them win, we're helping them win.  When we're too afraid to allow our neighbors to enjoy their lives, when we're too afraid to allow people to carry common tools like pocketknives, when we're too afraid to allow people who look different, or talk different, or worship different, to enjoy the same freedoms that our Constitution promises to all -- then we've not only given in to the terrorists, but we're doing their work for them.

I used to get bullied a lot when I was in grade school, until I learned that responding to a bully by cringing and cowering just meant that you cringed and cowered your way through life.  Looking them in the eye and telling them that they can smack you, but they'll still be an ass**** and you'll still be right may get you a black eye, but that eye will be attached to a head that you can hold up high.

Tim, Right On!  Forgive me if I wander Off Topic and reminisce...

When I was 8, my family moved from a town of 20,000 people - half of whom seemed to be family or friends - to a village of 84 people.  Where there was literally nothing to do until a year later, when I discovered balsa model airplane kits.  In the meantime, I discovered books - and I mean the classics.

60+ years later, I still remember the impact reading a poem had on me.  Seems a traveler passes by a cemetery, sees a funeral in progress, and wonders how the man died.  Then, on further thought, wonders how the man lived - and which was most important.

I too was picked on a lot - I was about half the size of anyone else my age, had done 2 grades in one year to make it worse, and won’t even go into other factors ...  Well, thinking about that poem changed my life.  I decided that even death would be preferable to cowering and running.

The next year, we moved to another town of 20,000, where I instantly made dozens of friends.  Shortly after school started there, the school bully waylaid one of them and beat him up pretty good - even though the 2 of them were about the same size.

Well, I waited for the opportunity to address the bully in front of the school when there were lots of other kids around, then confronted him and told him if he ever laid a hand on my friend again, I’d ... well, you fill in the blanks.  He looked down at me, laughed, and told me he’d ... fill in the blanks again.

Whereupon I replied, “Then do it here and now - you don’t have to hide and wait for me in the alley”.

He was scared to death of me from that point on.  Two years later, we played on the same football team.  I was the 77 lb quarterback and captain; he was a 160+ lb lineman who literally answered “Yes Sir!” every time I screamed at him to shape up.

Flash forward many years: I had the opportunity to manage an interpreting business with the Somali (read: Muslim) refugee community in Minneapolis.  It was a great experience: I made a lot of friends, and especially enjoyed conversations with a young Somali man who spent quite a bit of time in our office.

We got to the point where we were able to discuss literally anything quite openly.  But the most surprising revelation came the day we discussed the “Black Hawk Down” American experience in Somalia.  At one point Said became livid, pounded his fist on a desk several times, and shouted ”Dennis!  You have to understand!  Unless you are willing to DIE for what you say you believe in, you will have no respect in the Muslim world!  None!”

Please keep that in mind when reading the words of, or dealing with, those who think we can “negotiate” peace with those who would kill us.

STRENGTH assures peace!
Think for yourself !  XXX might win the Nats, be an expert on designing, building, finishing, flying, tuning engines - but you might not wanna take tax advice from him.  Or consider his views on the climate to be fact ...

Offline PerttiMe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1175
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #27 on: March 28, 2012, 12:40:21 AM »
Actually, the vehicle of choice for terrorists is the automobile.  Perhaps if we licensed them and drivers?   LL~
That is what I was thinking.

There's also another reason for licensing automobiles. Just look at the statistics on how many people - men, women, and children - are killed and maimed every year by automobiles.
I built a Blue Pants as a kid. Wish I still had it. Might even learn to fly it.

Offline Bill Heher

  • Fix-it
  • 2020 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 941
  • I may not always BOM- but I do the re-builds!
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #28 on: March 28, 2012, 10:36:03 AM »
That shows the incredible stupidity of the editor(s). Terrorists will use what ever they can, rules be damned. Same for any criminal, they don't care about any laws whatsoever, they do what ever they please until caught, then released by bleeding hearts. Best cure is the Colt 1911 .45 ACP. Got mine. H^^


Mine is a M1911 .45' Series 70 National Match, and I have been stoking up on ammo for that, my Ruger .357 , and a sporterized SKS for years.  Ammo is what the gun control advocates will go after next, just lok at the price rise in the past 5 yrs.

On the plus sidE, I am much better at putting 5 in the black at 50', than I am at flying my deadly " drone" through the full pattern!
Bill Heher
Central Florida and across the USA!
If it's broke Fix-it
If it ain't broke- let me see it for a minute AMA 264898- since 1988!

Offline Bob Reeves

  • 2016 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3415
    • Somethin'Xtra Inc.
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #29 on: March 28, 2012, 10:58:38 AM »
I lucked into one of the new Ruger SR1911 45's very nice 1911. Fit is as tight as most of the customes. It's really amazing how many in this hobby are into guns.. Enough in our club to build a shooting range at the flying field. Only problem is they sometimes have to make the decision of flying or shooting.



Offline Lauri Malila

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1635
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #30 on: March 28, 2012, 01:19:55 PM »

 Hi.

 I'm not that worried about terrorists and I think it's childish to start talking about guns. But that's my opinion.
 Anyway, I can see a big safety issue in future, caused by the fact that anyone can buy & fly, for example, a turbine powered  jet model weighting 20 or more kilo's.
 In the end many of them are built by non-professional, or non-experienced people (children?) somewhere in Asia, and controlled by devices assembled from recycled electronic components.
 If I've allready seen quite serious structural problems in many CL RTF-planes, I expect to see same in bigger RC models. Our CL models are quite harmless compared to those. L

Offline Douglas Ames

  • 2014 Supporters
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 1299
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #31 on: March 28, 2012, 06:04:27 PM »
I lucked into one of the new Ruger SR1911 45's very nice 1911. Fit is as tight as most of the customes. It's really amazing how many in this hobby are into guns.. Enough in our club to build a shooting range at the flying field. Only problem is they sometimes have to make the decision of flying or shooting.

Nice! That was my first choice (tax refund buy) but I settled on a minty Ruger P90T .45 ACP.
Ever notice how many guys have Cats on this forum? Then again I wouldn't want a jumpin' Dog with a waggin' tail around my models!
AMA 656546

If you do a little bit every day it will get done, or you can do it tomorrow.

Offline George

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1468
  • Love people, Use things.
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #32 on: March 28, 2012, 06:36:58 PM »
Wait until some politician realizes that a baseball bat can be used as a weapon!   S?P  H^^

George
George Bain
AMA 23454

Offline bill bischoff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • ******
  • Posts: 1707
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #33 on: March 28, 2012, 08:23:36 PM »
OK, since the no politics rule has been tossed aside, let's see if I've got this right. The media incorrectly reports that model airplanes and the people who fly them can be a danger to our country and its citizens. So to register our general displeasure, we start waving guns around. I don't think this is helping.

Offline Larry Renger

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 4002
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #34 on: March 28, 2012, 09:10:57 PM »
There is a multitude of gun forums.  I agree that that part of the discussion should be taken elsewhere (MY thread, after all!).

What I have not heard is a good response to send to the newspaper.  I think a letters to the editor program could be beneficial.  Poke all the holes in the guys arguments you can, and let the paper deal with it (probably by ignoring us, but we really should try).
Think S.M.A.L.L. y'all and, it's all good, CL, FF and RC!

DesignMan
 BTW, Dracula Sucks!  A closed mouth gathers no feet!

Grady Widener

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #35 on: March 28, 2012, 10:16:30 PM »
Looking to change the world or substantiate a position?
Then each are must haves to leverage influence and control outcomes in today's corridors of power.

1.  Subtlety
2.  Finance
3.  Connections

If any are missing, then a scenario that includes dated ideals on a shelf staged for closeout, is the one most proximate.

Best,
Grady
« Last Edit: March 28, 2012, 10:49:50 PM by Grady Widener »

Offline Bill Heher

  • Fix-it
  • 2020 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 941
  • I may not always BOM- but I do the re-builds!
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #36 on: March 28, 2012, 10:41:18 PM »
I apologize for getting caught up in the weapons Show and Tell, butnthe fact that Americans are allowed to own firearms is a deterant to those thinking about taking up arms against us. Admiral Yamato of Japan said "we can never invade America - there would be a gun behind every blade of grass.

Anyway - Here is my list of rebuttals to the esteemed writer - whom it appears spent at least 5 minutes researching his column.

1. Opening statement refers to "New Aviation Law"' and implies it was passed to allow unrestricted operation of "drones".
 Inaccurate statement, the new Federal Aviation Regulation in fact was designed to control the unrestricted use of "Unmanned Aerial Vehicles". The exclusion of R/C aircraft used for sport or educational purposes was carefully researched and debated, and it was determined that at a total weight of 55 lbs, there was little payload capacity. This makes model flown within the requirements a low threat risk, especially compared to a 3000 lb Car / truck that can easily pack hundreds of pounds of explosives undetected.

2. He states tht anyone can fly a "video guided drone" without supervision.  Incorrect statement- rules state that the plane must be in visual contact,and have a 2nd pilot ready to assume control from anyone flying via telemetry. Of course he admits that those with criminal intent will not follow the rules.

3.  He sites the absurd liquid ban as a reason to further require the regulation of UAVs.  He cannot even see that he is decreasing his own credibility by using a bad idea as basis for his argument. A knee jerk reaction to a knee jerk reaction, pretty soon you are kicking yourself in the head.

4.  Licensing - as typed in another post, fishing licenses are mainly used to support Game and Fish activities for the benefit of both fisherman and fish. Your AMA membership is the recognized Sporting License for model flier in the US, and is recognized by both the FAA  and FAI as such. The FAI is Intrnational, and headquartered in France, what more degree of legitimacy can an educated, well rounded, pompous windbag desire?

That's a start - anyone else see more inaccurate / untrue statements in the editorial?
Bill Heher
Central Florida and across the USA!
If it's broke Fix-it
If it ain't broke- let me see it for a minute AMA 264898- since 1988!

Offline john e. holliday

  • 24 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 22783
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #37 on: March 29, 2012, 09:18:59 AM »
Speaking of weapons, the ordinary every day ball point pen can be very lethal.
John E. "DOC" Holliday
10421 West 56th Terrace
Shawnee, KANSAS  66203
AMA 23530  Have fun as I have and I am still breaking a record.

Offline Terrence Durrill

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #38 on: March 29, 2012, 08:09:31 PM »
For you gun guys....you might find the following tidbit interesting:

      The left-wing subversives want a disarmed society to rule.  As Nancy Pelosi was heard saying to former Senator Howard Mtezembaum as they walked together, "Socialism cannot succeed unless we get the guns."  No political...just fact.  Anyhow, we are having great flying weather in the Midwest.....everybody get out and fly, fly, fly...but, stay alert!    y1    D>K

Offline Mike Callas

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 333
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #39 on: March 29, 2012, 08:24:09 PM »
I'm a liberal and been flying control line for 54 years.

Which goes to show that democracies are like airplanes. You need both a left and a right wing.

The gov't takes this issue seriously. When the POTUS comes to visit for some quick cash, our field is closed via Notam. While highly unlikely, it is conceivable a crude cruise missile can be used to create some mayhem. Next visit, it would be interesting to take a spectrum analyzer out to field to see if active measures are being employed to prevent anyone from flying.

I asked my daughters to invite the good prof to the basin to see the planes and their limitations. They told me to go back to the garage.

Mike Griffin

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #40 on: March 31, 2012, 02:18:19 PM »
Guys I have received an a email from the man who wrote this article asking for a chance to explain himself further and I told him we would welcome any further explanation that he wanted to offer.  I will let you know when I hear from him..

Mike

Offline Randy Cuberly

  • 21 supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 3674
Re: Disturbing editorial!
« Reply #41 on: March 31, 2012, 03:47:00 PM »
Guys I have received an a email from the man who wrote this article asking for a chance to explain himself further and I told him we would welcome any further explanation that he wanted to offer.  I will let you know when I hear from him..

Mike

It's completely unnecessary for Mr Villasenor to explain his "feelings" about model aviation or his dubious reasons for writing such drivel.  His reasons and his motives are quite clear to anyone that understands even a little bit about "modern" journalism.  He wants, like all journalists to see his name in print, sensationalism sells papers, and an article like this keeps him on the "good" side of his liberal editors.  One of which likely assigned him this "turkey" in the first place.
His statements show a total ignorance of model aviation and past terrorist history, or a willingness to ignore either and simply play the sensationalism "tune".  The latter being the most likely.
None of this is surprising.  Open up most any newspaper today or turn on NBC, CNN, ABC, CBS or any other "hack" organization that calls themselves news and you will see the same pattern.  Ignore facts and sensible reporting and play for sensationalism.
After all...it works.  We've already given this poor slob more time in the "light" than he deserves.
At one time I actually majored in journalism until I realized the kind of folks that I would be associating with on a day to day basis.   Especially those that seem to climb to the executive ranks of the major news organizations.  Scuzz ball rabble rousers..ALL.
If it wasn't for the potential harm they do with their half truths and outright lies to foster sensationalism it would be best to simply ignore them, and most intelligent people would.  Unfortunately the general public has been programed to listen to these self appointed "guardians" of all that is worth while and accept what they say like little automatons.  A truly sad state for todays society. 
Of course these "guardians" do it for one reason only POWER.
I try really hard not to let them have it!

Randy Cuberly
Randy Cuberly
Tucson, AZ


Advertise Here
Tags:
 


Advertise Here