I really appreciate all the suggestions and info everyone has offered.
Here is another picture. To join the blades, I have used dural rings, then Kevlar rings, and the latest series are reinforced with carbon. L
Lauri, you do not have your location in your profile, thoes props sure look like pushers to me. Any chance you would sell me one?
Why are so few stunt pilots using 4S's around the world???
Are "WE" wrong? Are "THEY" missing something??? Who knows!
Regards,
Claudio.
Pretty sure I can answer this, at least for the US. Back when everyone was playing with four strokes they could see the potential but tried to apply two stroke methodology and it simply didn't work. By the time we discovered how to make a four stroke work, electrics were just becoming popular and with the exception of the few of us that really appreciate what a 4 stroke can do, most moved to electric without ever experiencing what a good 4 stroke setup is actually capable of.
Hi Bob,
Did you find the 3b prop to be any better than a 2b in the Saito 62? I'm DYING to try a 3 blade prop in my 72 so I'd love to hear your comments before I purchase one.
Thanks,
Claudio.
Claudio, Not sure I can really answer your question as it has been some time since I've flown the Latency with the Carbon 3 blade. I went to wood props because that is all I could find in a reverse pitch that was readily available. Comparing a normal rotating 3 blade with a reverse pitch 2 blade would kinda be like apples to oranges. Running reverse pitch automatically gives you more line tension in the top of the vertical 8 and hourglass, along with the 3rd loop of the clover. The main reason I would like to try a 3 blade on the 72 is because I'm hoping I can use a smaller prop than what I believe the engine will turn using a two blade.
Several have read between the lines on some of the reasons I would prefer carbon to wood, we can make wood work but hard to beat the consistency of carbon and consistency is one of the things that wins contests.