stunthanger.com

General control line discussion => Open Forum => Topic started by: frank williams on November 20, 2015, 09:30:22 AM

Title: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: frank williams on November 20, 2015, 09:30:22 AM
Quite a site coming over the house yesterday.  NASA has three WB 57's, one newly added to the fleet after being in storage in Tucson, and they had them all flying yesterday.  These are the old RAF Canberra's.  NASA uses them for high alt. research, etc.  Big wing.  Lots of aluminum.
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: john e. holliday on November 20, 2015, 09:39:13 AM
Lucky you.
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: Kreth on November 20, 2015, 10:08:21 AM
They were built from B-57s built by Martin which was similar to the RAF design.  The longwing versions of which these are, were rebuilds or re-manufactured from the Martin units by General Dynamics.  I could look up the numbers and see which ones NASA has now.  One of the ones they have is originally tail #503 which we had at Rhein-Main AFB in Germany in 1967.




















r
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: Randy Ryan on November 20, 2015, 10:24:48 AM
They were built from B-57s built by Martin which was similar to the RAF design.  The longwing versions of which these are, were rebuilds or re-manufactured from the Martin units by General Dynamics.  I could look up the numbers and see which ones NASA has now.  One of the ones they have is originally tail #503 which we had at Rhein-Main AFB in Germany in 1967.


r



You beat me to it but I'll expand a bit. The English Electric Canberra was an all wood airframe. Martin built the B-57s. I crewed EB-57E's, these were equipped with tons of electronic countermeasure equipment and zero armament. The WB-57s were originally modifications for weather service, not sure if NASA uses them for that but probably. Little known was the RB-57 which had a huge stretched wing and was for high altitude reconnaissance.

The B-57 was really fighter like akin to a B-25. They were actually very aerobatic and maneuverable in their basic dress. Our squadron commander Col John Harris of the 4713DSES did some interesting maneuvers with a stripped out EB when we were deactivating that squadron. It was very impressive to see and I especially remember the snap roll over the runway, it was spectacular!!

In case you can't tell, I loved this aircraft, I also loved the F-106s I crewed after this and equally hated the B-52s I was forced onto later.


Here's and RB and an EB (A model)
Added a neat 3 view showing the standard wing and the RB wing
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: frank williams on November 20, 2015, 10:35:59 AM
When they come over the house it sounds like a thousand vacuum cleaners in the sky.
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: Randy Ryan on November 20, 2015, 12:09:18 PM
When they come over the house it sounds like a thousand vacuum cleaners in the sky.




I think they're probably converted to turbofans instead of the original J-57s
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: goozgog on November 20, 2015, 02:08:09 PM
Hi Randy,
            The English Electric Canberra was the immediate replacement for the
(almost) all wood DeHavilland Mosquito.
The Canberra always was all metal except for the leading edge of the vertical stab
on earlier copies.

  Remember that at the end of WWII Britain was a world leader in advanced
aircraft design thanks to their jet engines and a little help from friends and
recent enemies. There was a long and deep official distrust of wooden aircraft,
probably due to the almost tropical British climate. I can't imagine anyone ,
post war, seriously considering wasting a Rolls Royce Nene in a wooden airframe.

Cheers!  :-)

Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: Gerald Arana on November 20, 2015, 02:14:59 PM
So who's going to be the first to make/design an electric twin ducted fan stunter of this airplane?  ;D
Don't look at me, I have to many projects now. y1

Jerry
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: David Russum on November 20, 2015, 11:54:29 PM
Interesting.....do you have any pictures that show the tail numbers?  After VSC in 2010 I went on the boneyard tour and was surprised to see this in the refurbishment area.  Could be one of the planes you saw...

Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: Scott Richlen on November 21, 2015, 06:28:06 AM
Look at Frank's second picture again.  It looks like they've got their bomb-bay doors open!

Down there in Texas defending the border?    ;D
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: wwwarbird on November 21, 2015, 09:18:01 AM

 Way cool. y1
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: Elwyn Aud on November 21, 2015, 09:31:43 AM
The one recently refurbished had been in storage for decades. I wonder if it set a record for the length of time sitting in mothballed storage and then getting put back into active service? I thought I read somewhere that it was 41 years.
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: Randy Ryan on November 22, 2015, 02:52:09 PM
Hi Randy,
            The English Electric Canberra was the immediate replacement for the
(almost) all wood DeHavilland Mosquito.
The Canberra always was all metal except for the leading edge of the vertical stab
on earlier copies.

  Remember that at the end of WWII Britain was a world leader in advanced
aircraft design thanks to their jet engines and a little help from friends and
recent enemies. There was a long and deep official distrust of wooden aircraft,
probably due to the almost tropical British climate. I can't imagine anyone ,
post war, seriously considering wasting a Rolls Royce Nene in a wooden airframe.

Cheers!  :-)




Hi Keith, I stand corrected, thanks
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: goozgog on November 22, 2015, 03:55:06 PM
Hi Randy,
              Sorry if it seemed like I was correcting you.
It's all about keeping the history straight.
Since you actually worked on B-57's I'm sure you know
more than I do. Thanks for being gracious.

  Just for fun , can anyone identify this Cold Warrior?
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: Elwyn Aud on November 22, 2015, 04:24:22 PM
Looks like a CF-100 Canuck. One of it's nicknames was Zilch.
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: goozgog on November 23, 2015, 03:29:24 AM
You got it Elwyn.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Canada_CF-100_Canuck


  When I first saw one of these on a plinth, I thought it was
a Canberra until I had a second look.
  It's interesting that a tiny country like Canada had the resources
to develop it's own fighter. Now it takes an international consortium
to do anything.
Much more sophisticated now, of course.

Cheers! - K.
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: Steve Thomas on November 23, 2015, 04:44:42 AM

  It's interesting that a tiny country like Canada had the resources
to develop it's own fighter. Now it takes an international consortium
to do anything.

Even more impressive was the CF-105, even if it never went into production.


Sweden has done pretty well, too, with the Draken, Viggen and Gripen. Their population is under 10 million, not even a third of Canada's.
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: rustler on November 23, 2015, 03:13:46 PM
..these were equipped with tons of electronic countermeasure equipment..

errr.. might they be any good (just what we now require?) for our anti-submarine surveillance?
Our government scrapped our last effort before it even got in the air.  ???
Now we find we need it! HB~>
Title: Re: NASA WB 57's fly over
Post by: Balsa Butcher on November 23, 2015, 03:54:59 PM
Probably lots of surplus Lockheed P-3 Orions stored at Tucson. With updated electronics would still be a viable and well proven anti-submarine platform. Many are still in service. Might suggest it the next time you have lunch with the Prime Minister.  ;) As far as wooden jets go, didn't the DeHaviland Vampire have a wooden pilots compartment? I seem to remember the nose at least being made of wood.This would make sense since they also made the Mosquito. 8)