Author Topic: Most beautifl and perfect stunt motor (Read 15952 times)

Glenn (Gravitywell) Reach · « **on:** February 20, 2016, 05:45:03 PM »

Other than the ugly RC carb on it, I personally think the ST .51 was the most beautiful and perfect stunt motor made. From the first time I saw one back in the early 80's, I wanted one. Not to be of course because they just cost way too much for me. Anyways, I recently saw a picture of one and it got me to thinking what others considered the most perfect stunt motor.

So fellow hobbyists....what do you think is the most beautiful and perfect stunt motor made? And remember, there are two criteria....
1. beauty
2. perfect stunt run.

Motorman · « **Reply #1 on:** February 20, 2016, 06:16:41 PM »

Beautiful blue color and perfect stunt run everytime.

Other than that the SuperTiger G21-46 is/was a great stunt motor. Got one on my old time stunter.

MM

RknRusty · « **Reply #2 on:** February 20, 2016, 06:31:15 PM »

Hmmm, well being that I'm both financially challenged and my patterns semi-suck, so... well I've recently developed a crush on my OS Max-S .35 with an aluminum Zambelli venturi and no muffler. That's for my lighter weight Goldberg Shoestring. It growls a 4-2 break like Swiss clockwerk. And for the bigger Cardinal, I hate to be common, but I kind of like the LA.46, no break, just steady smooth authoritative power.

Hope I didn't set the bar too high, Lol.
Rusty

EDIT: Oh, I missed the first criterion, beauty. My LA is blue, hope that doesn't disqualify me.

Mark Scarborough · « **Reply #3 on:** February 20, 2016, 06:38:15 PM »

Quote from: Motorman on February 20, 2016, 06:16:41 PM

Beautiful blue color and perfect stunt run everytime.

Other than that the SuperTiger G21-46 is/was a great stunt motor. Got one on my old time stunter.

MM

pretty much yepper,,

though on a budget,, the LA46,,
not on a budget,, 40 VF piped, or a PA 40 UL

M Spencer · « **Reply #4 on:** February 20, 2016, 06:55:30 PM »

If your neighbours are connoisseurs of classic sounds , and live within 2 miles , theyll appreciate the aural delights of the 1958 FOX 59 .

probably a capitol offence to use one for Combat these days . Is Aeromuddler .15 plan @ 150% as the spars work out to be four foot ( 48 in. )

so is 54 or 56 / span . a . 40 might be more sensable . But not quite the same .

Walter Hicks · « **Reply #5 on:** February 20, 2016, 10:45:38 PM »

RO JETT 67

Ted Fancher · « **Reply #6 on:** February 20, 2016, 11:21:40 PM »

Ro Jett .61 with the BB mods and Brian Eather props and pipes. Darn near as consistent as any unemployed drone motor and actually sounds like a real model airplane when in use.

Brett Buck · « **Reply #7 on:** February 21, 2016, 12:09:41 AM »

Quote from: Ted Fancher on February 20, 2016, 11:21:40 PM

Ro Jett .61 with the BB mods and Brian Eather props and pipes. Darn near as consistent as any unemployed drone motor and actually sounds like a real model airplane when in use.

I have been running the same engine since mid-2007, and once I discovered the effect of the various blends of fuel types, it has been nearly magical, particularly in heavy air. Always the exactly the right amount of power at exactly the right time.

Brett

Lauri Malila · « **Reply #8 on:** February 21, 2016, 12:50:02 AM »

Barstock Jett looks like something Lego:)

Bob Reeves · « **Reply #9 on:** February 21, 2016, 01:51:19 AM »

All Saito's from the 40a to the 72.

Brett Buck · « **Reply #10 on:** February 21, 2016, 02:14:01 AM »

Quote from: Lauri Malila on February 21, 2016, 12:50:02 AM

Barstock Jett looks like something Lego:)

Yes, but the trophies look good.

Brett

Steve Bakac · « **Reply #11 on:** February 21, 2016, 03:25:23 AM »

VF25 on Brian Eathers pipe apc 10/4 prop it's a very quite n sweet little motor pulls a vector 40 around well
Cheers. Steve

Derek Barry · « **Reply #12 on:** February 21, 2016, 05:23:24 AM »

PA 65

Derek

Derek Barry · « **Reply #13 on:** February 21, 2016, 05:48:29 AM »

Quote from: Brett Buck on February 21, 2016, 02:14:01 AM

Yes, but the trophies look good.

Brett

Great picture, by the way.

Derek

DanielGelinas · « **Reply #14 on:** February 21, 2016, 06:22:47 AM »

Quote from: Glenn (Gravitywell) Reach on February 20, 2016, 05:45:03 PM

Other than the ugly RC carb on it, I personally think the ST .51 was the most beautiful and perfect stunt motor made. From the first time I saw one back in the early 80's, I wanted one. Not to be of course because they just cost way too much for me. Anyways, I recently saw a picture of one and it got me to thinking what others considered the most perfect stunt motor.

So fellow hobbyists....what do you think is the most beautiful and perfect stunt motor made? And remember, there are two criteria....
1. beauty
2. perfect stunt run.

Hi Glenn,
Great post!
That st .51 really looks like the rotax engine in my 1970 skidoo

I find the Brodak .40 looks great and gives a perfect stunt run.
Any of the enyas are also beautiful engines.
Cheers,
Dan

Dan McEntee · « **Reply #15 on:** February 21, 2016, 08:16:40 AM »

   I'm fond of the ST G.51 but I believe they didn't appear until the early 90's. I had one in my first Shark.45 that I took to VSC in 1994, and they were new to Tower Hopbbies/Great Planes at about 89 bucks each. I think Gerry Phelps showed my the first one I saw at a Chicago area Fermilab contest. It's been my main engine of choice since them and have collected quite a few.
   Type at you later,
   Dan McEntee

John Park · « **Reply #16 on:** February 21, 2016, 08:53:13 AM »

That plan of GMA's English Peacemaker takes me back to 1960, when it was the first really aerobatic C/L model I ever built. It was powered by a (borrowed) Allen-Mercury AM35, a neat, lightweight, plain-bearing 3.5cc (.21 cu. in.) diesel that ran beautifully on a 9X6 nylon prop., never missing a beat, never sagging in the overheads and starting with a couple of choked turns and two or three flicks. No silencer, but we flew within a hundred yards of a cul-de-sac of ordinary homes and nobody ever complained - except once when we were still flying at nine o'clock at night... Perhaps nostalgia isn't what it used to be, but it's pretty good all the same.

Gerald Arana · « **Reply #17 on:** February 21, 2016, 09:00:25 AM »

I have to go with Brett and Ted. The BSE RO-Jett (any size) is a piece of "Jewelry" in my book having owned a couple of them. But I stupidly sold them..........

Jerry

proparc · « **Reply #18 on:** February 21, 2016, 09:16:40 AM »

Does it have to be a CL run?

Since no one answered,I am just going to post this. For me this is the greatest. I happen to own 2 of these, so I know what I am talking about.

Second, I would have to agree with Bob Reeves. The Saito's are a joy to behold and use.

Matt Colan · « **Reply #19 on:** February 21, 2016, 09:42:39 AM »

Any PA. Of all the PA's I've run so far, the 65 is my favorite.

Glenn (Gravitywell) Reach · « **Reply #20 on:** February 21, 2016, 11:04:11 AM »

wow....there are some really beautiful motors out there. I've never seen a Ro-Jet before....stunning! But I have to stay with the ST I'm afraid....its beauty is just too ingrained in my head. The ST .51 is one of those things that I have drooled after for so many years that it has become one of those untouchable dreams. "Heavy sigh"

Keep those pictures and memories coming.

FLOYD CARTER · « **Reply #21 on:** February 21, 2016, 11:15:34 AM »

I can't exactly call the ST 51 "beautiful". Mine came from Tommie Lay, and performs perfectly in a Brodak Legacy.
I complained to Tommie about that "over-the-top" cylinder head, and we discussed machining it down to a reasonable size-both to save weight and to improve its "curb appeal".

Tommie also advised me to scrap that ugly stock muffler, which I did in favor of a lightweight tube muffler from Mr. Dinger.

Well, the ST is hidden under a cowling, so I don't have to look at it.

Floyd

Robert Zambelli · « **Reply #22 on:** February 21, 2016, 11:48:33 AM »

How about one for Old Time Stunt?
A really pretty engine.
Anyone know the size?

Bob Z

Trostle · « **Reply #23 on:** February 21, 2016, 11:59:04 AM »

I will vote for Lauri's engine. The photo does not do it justice. His engine run at the 2014 Championships was superb.

For Classic engines, the OS 35S should be at the top of the list.

Keith

George Mitchell · « **Reply #24 on:** February 21, 2016, 12:29:38 PM »

Jett bar stock

FLOYD CARTER · « **Reply #25 on:** February 21, 2016, 12:44:03 PM »

Robert Z. That is a Cunningham Blue Streak .64 cuin.. Uses the same piston/cylinder as the Orwick 64. Probably made by RJL. The Orwick is actually nicer!

Jim Kraft · « **Reply #26 on:** February 21, 2016, 12:59:40 PM »

How about the Marvin Miller version of the Anderson Spitfire, or any of the originals as far as that goes.

Robert Zambelli · « **Reply #27 on:** February 21, 2016, 01:48:26 PM »

Sorry, Guys - the color fooled me. I thought it was an Orwick.
Floyd and De Hill set me straight!
Anyway, here's the Orwick.

Bob Z.

Randy Cuberly · « **Reply #28 on:** February 21, 2016, 01:59:10 PM »

The new K77 from Kaz Minato. Promises to be a great stunt powerhouse. Mine has run on bench only but will soon be in a Trivial Pursuit.
Very pretty in my humble opinion. 1/2 oz lighter than the PA75. One shown is with muffler mine will run with pipe.

Randy Cuberly

Mel Gray · « **Reply #29 on:** February 21, 2016, 03:43:57 PM »

What's the matter with you guys? No contest here. This progenitor of stunt motors has got to have won more stunt contests than any other. And, pretty is as pretty does................... ;<)

Mel

Daniel_Munro · « **Reply #30 on:** February 21, 2016, 04:07:59 PM »

Of the stunt engines I own. The Stalker .51re is my favourite.

Very consistent runs and not too bad looking either. Only difference with mine is a carbon muffler.

Glenn (Gravitywell) Reach · « **Reply #31 on:** February 21, 2016, 08:04:41 PM »

I was wondering how long before someone posted the Fox .35! I always have a smile on my face when I see one. Always good memories.

MikeCoulombe · « **Reply #32 on:** February 21, 2016, 10:29:29 PM »

The ST 51 from Tom Dixon has one of the best runs I have.

Glenn (Gravitywell) Reach · « **Reply #33 on:** February 22, 2016, 12:04:19 AM »

Whew....I was beginning to think I was the only one! ST .51 forever!

john e. holliday · « **Reply #34 on:** February 22, 2016, 09:37:46 AM »

At the time it was the $10.00 McCoy Red Head .35 in a plastic box, blue base with clear lid. It was also my first .35. Next was the Green Head K&B .35. I was in my 20's when I got my first of many Fox .35 Stunt engines.

Paul Walker · « **Reply #35 on:** February 22, 2016, 12:44:55 PM »

Well, for electric power, the Plettenberg is tops.
For IC, I prefer the McCoy 40 for it's looks and stunt run.

Tim Wescott · « **Reply #36 on:** February 22, 2016, 12:50:06 PM »

Of the motors that I've run, the 46LA. Because, blue (well, that and only having run cheap engines).

Allan Perret · « **Reply #37 on:** February 22, 2016, 02:32:39 PM »

Quote from: Paul Walker on February 22, 2016, 12:44:55 PM

Well, for electric power, the Plettenberg is tops.
For IC, I prefer the McCoy 40 for it's looks and stunt run.

Are you still using the Pletts ? I thought you had switched to the Power32.

Randy Cuberly · « **Reply #38 on:** February 22, 2016, 03:36:58 PM »

Quote from: Paul Walker on February 22, 2016, 12:44:55 PM

Well, for electric power, the Plettenberg is tops.
For IC, I prefer the McCoy 40 for it's looks and stunt run.

Paul which Pletts are you using?

Randy Cuberly

proparc · « **Reply #39 on:** February 22, 2016, 04:00:55 PM »

Quote from: Daniel_Munro on February 21, 2016, 04:07:59 PM

Of the stunt engines I own. The Stalker .51re is my favourite.

Very consistent runs and not too bad looking either. Only difference with mine is a carbon muffler.

If it's one thing I wished I had gotten into, was some Stalkers. I would have loved to have at least one side exhaust version.

Larry Renger · « **Reply #40 on:** February 22, 2016, 06:17:46 PM »

Silly me, I like my L&J Ceramic Fox .35 (actually, the only stunt motor I own)

Glenn (Gravitywell) Reach · « **Reply #41 on:** February 22, 2016, 09:04:28 PM »

I've always wondered....what makes a Ceramic Fox a Ceramic Fox? How is different?

Brett Buck · « **Reply #42 on:** February 22, 2016, 09:15:12 PM »

Quote from: Glenn (Gravitywell) Reach on February 22, 2016, 09:04:28 PM

I've always wondered....what makes a Ceramic Fox a Ceramic Fox? How is different?

Ceramic coated liner - lasts much longer, modern fits, and lighter with an aluminum piston and aluminum liner. Should also vibrate much less due to the lighter piston, but I haven't actually paid close attention to the few I have seen. Done correctly, should last forever

I would be interested in anyone's reports on the engine, preferably someone with experience with competitive stunt engines (from 2016, not 1955) because it sounds like a good idea.

Brett

Paul Walker · « **Reply #43 on:** February 22, 2016, 11:56:29 PM »

Quote from: Allan Perret on February 22, 2016, 02:32:39 PM

Are you still using the Pletts ? I thought you had switched to the Power32.

Well, I ran a Cobra at the Nat's. Shortly after I returned, the bearings went. I replaced them and they didn't last long.

I had run the Scorpion earlier in the year, but the bearings in it went.

I was forced to switch back to the Power 32 as other than a occasional bearing going, it worked fine. Their bearings are not expensive, and simple and quick to change. So I used a Power 32 at the Team Trials.

I am now using Plettenberg's again. I still have the original ones ai used from late 2006 and they still work great.

I have used the Orbit series, in sizes from 30 to 25 to 20, and now 15. The Orbit 15 weighs 1 ounce less than the Power 32, and powers the plane no differently. No significant inefficiency using it the way I have to.

They are works of art, and cost like it though! If you use one, you better be serious.

Mark Scarborough · « **Reply #44 on:** February 23, 2016, 08:17:19 AM »

Quote from: Paul Walker on February 22, 2016, 11:56:29 PM

Well, I ran a Cobra at the Nat's. Shortly after I returned, the bearings went. I replaced them and they didn't last long.

I had run the Scorpion earlier in the year, but the bearings in it went.

I was forced to switch back to the Power 32 as other than a occasional bearing going, it worked fine. Their bearings are not expensive, and simple and quick to change. So I used a Power 32 at the Team Trials.

I am now using Plettenberg's again. I still have the original ones ai used from late 2006 and they still work great.

I have used the Orbit series, in sizes from 30 to 25 to 20, and now 15. The Orbit 15 weighs 1 ounce less than the Power 32, and powers the plane no differently. No significant inefficiency using it the way I have to.

They are works of art, and cost like it though! If you use one, you better be serious.

Paul,, if you are using Plettenburgs again, why not the Predator

instead of the orbitLOL,, I mean hey, you fly a Predator,, with a predator right,, how perfect would that be
http://plettenberg-motors.com/estore/index.php/outrunner-predator-c-2000_206

Dave_Trible · « **Reply #45 on:** February 23, 2016, 03:30:47 PM »

The RO Jett .76 is by far my first choice. I am, however, aquiring this little gem to play with. It's a Russian Zeus .61.

Dave

FLOYD CARTER · « **Reply #46 on:** February 23, 2016, 04:18:06 PM »

Why not get serious and run one of these?

Floyd

Dave_Trible · « **Reply #47 on:** February 23, 2016, 04:36:16 PM »

That's too cool Floyd. An Atom?

Dave

Avaiojet · « **Reply #48 on:** February 23, 2016, 04:49:12 PM »

Although used by many R/C modelers in the USA, this little puppy is known a bit better on the other side of the Pond.

The Jen engines can be purchased with an OEM venturi.

I'm building a model around the Jen 57 currently.

Robert Zambelli · « **Reply #49 on:** February 24, 2016, 10:23:04 AM »

From a box of engines I unpacked from around twenty years ago.

Anyone ever run one?

Bob Z.