stunthanger.com

General control line discussion => Open Forum => Topic started by: Terrence Durrill on June 02, 2016, 11:09:48 AM

Title: More mud for the waters...........
Post by: Terrence Durrill on June 02, 2016, 11:09:48 AM


    Check this out:

           Thursday May 02, 2016

 FAA Considering New Model Aircraft Regulations


The FAA Is Now Looking At Regulating The Operators Of Control Line Model Aircraft

    May 02 Special Edition

Long before radio controlled model aircraft were in operation, modelers found another way to allow the model builder to actually control their model airplane. This is called control line flying (U-Control) which has been popular since the 1930s.



In a typical U-control operation, the model aircraft is attached to control lines and a control handle that operates the elevator of the aircraft. The operator stands at a center point as the airplane revolves around in a circle. While this is not complete control of the aircraft it does provide the ability to operate the elevators and do numerous stunts some maneuvers.

Now, as the FAA has clamped more restrictions on the flying of radio controlled model aircraft and drones, they are looking at the U-Control flyer next. The FAA has determined that the common length of the control line, which is about 60 feet, is excessive and that it allows the aircraft to be too far away from the operator and fly at it too great of an altitude. Therefore, the FAA is proposing to limit the control line length to 30 feet.

While shortening the control line may not seem like a big deal, The Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA) disagrees. They remind the FAA that as the control line gets shorter the operator must rotate at a faster speed. A typical 360 degree rotation for a control line operator is about 4 to 6 seconds. By shortening the lines, the rotation speed increases to the point that the operator may become dizzy and collapse. AMA says this could result in the operator releasing the control handle allowing the aircraft to head for parts unknown.



The FAA has quickly responded to this concern by saying that a new medical certification will be created for U-Control model airplane operators. This medical certification will test their ability to withstand rapid rotation of up to 60 revolutions per minute. They say rotation testing devices will be located at various points in the country, and will be operated by FAA medical examiners who will no longer be issuing third class medicals. The FAA also said these testing devices will be funded through registration fees charged to U-Control model aircraft. It is reported that the FAA Aeromedical Division and NASA are preparing to develop this new testing program.

The FAA will also be producing a video to discuss issues surrounding Rapid Rotation Disorientation (RRD) and the registration process for U-Control model airplanes.

FMI: www.faa.gov

                                        WHAT NEXT           ?      D>K      H^^
Title: Re: More mud for the waters...........
Post by: Motorman on June 02, 2016, 11:29:50 AM
Is that true?

MM
Title: Re: More mud for the waters...........
Post by: Mark Scarborough on June 02, 2016, 12:11:51 PM
especially since the AMA code requires safety thongs,, so they would never state that as you get dizzy you will release the handel
Title: Re: More mud for the waters...........
Post by: Randy Cuberly on June 02, 2016, 12:56:50 PM
C'mon guys....I thought it was pretty funny.

Maybe not as farfetched as some would like to believe!

 ~^ ~^ y1

 LL~ LL~ LL~ LL~ LL~

Randy Cuberly
Title: Re: More mud for the waters...........
Post by: Mark Scarborough on June 02, 2016, 12:58:42 PM
the problem comes when some well intentioned individual reads this and gets fired up believing it to be true, the next thing you know they are off on a rampage and that wont help anyone because it will in fact muddy up the waters,, and the REAL issue will be ignored,,

that said, yeah, its kinda funny as long as its CLEAR that this is humor not reality,,
Title: Re: More mud for the waters...........
Post by: Fredvon4 on June 02, 2016, 01:38:33 PM
Made me laugh out loud...and yes these IDIOTS are prone to do something this outrageously stupid!
Title: Re: More mud for the waters...........
Post by: Jim Carter on June 02, 2016, 04:41:12 PM
 LL~ LL~ LL~  Just wondering ..... what happens to team racing??   LL~ LL~  Three up, 30' lines, Fora 15's,   LL~ LL~ LL~  Fast combat???   LL~ LL~
Title: Re: More mud for the waters...........
Post by: Wynn Robins on June 02, 2016, 04:44:25 PM
..
Title: Re: More mud for the waters...........
Post by: Bob Reeves on June 02, 2016, 05:13:08 PM
In todays world it really wouldn't surprise me if some idiot actually proposed this.
Title: Re: More mud for the waters...........
Post by: Glenn (Gravitywell) Reach on June 02, 2016, 05:46:06 PM
That was just damned funny and anyone that thinks otherwise needs to get their funnybone examined! LL~
Title: Re: More mud for the waters...........
Post by: Rich Perry on June 02, 2016, 07:01:50 PM
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2675672
Title: Re: More mud for the waters...........
Post by: Steve Helmick on June 02, 2016, 08:24:23 PM
That was just damned funny and anyone that thinks otherwise needs to get their funnybone examined! LL~

If you actually had to fly and be concerned about the FAA police landing on you with both feet, you might not think it was funny at all. I think it's about 2 months too late. April 1 would have made it funny. And no, I didn't for a minute think the text was really from the FAA. Our government is overreaching their authority, and if we let them get away with it, you can expect yours to follow along soon enough.   H^^ Steve